A Party to this Convention may, by written communication addressed to the Director-General, propose amendments to this Convention. The Director-General shall circulate such communication to all Parties. If, within six months from the date of dispatch of the communication, no less than one half of the Parties reply favourably to the request, the Director-General shall present such proposal to the next session of the Conference of Parties for discussion and possible adoption.


State Parti State Party Vienna Convention Underwater Cultural Heritage Multilateral Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aust, A. (2007a). Modern treaty law and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aust, A. (2007b). Handbook of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burri-Nenova, M. (2009). The protection and promotion of cultural diversity at the international level. Scholar
  4. Ruiz Fabri, H. (2006). Reflections on possible future legal implications of the Convention. In N. Obuljen & J. Smiers (Eds.), UNESCO’s Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Making it work (pp. 73–87). Zagreb: Institute for International Relations. Scholar
  5. Shaw, M. (2008). International law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. UN. (2003). Final clauses of multilateral treaties. Handbook.
  7. Villiger, M. E. (2009). Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Europa- und Völkerrecht, Juristische FakultätTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations