Family Matters: Some Emerging Legal Issues in Intergenerational and Generational Relations

Chapter

Abstract

Family members may be very involved in the legal concerns of an older person and may even have a stake in the outcome. While family and friend involvement is very important they need to be helped to understand the ethical obligations that lawyers are required to follow. It is possible, in some circumstances, for more than one family member to be clients of the same lawyer. This is common in married couples. However, there are several reasons why lawyers always need to meet with the client alone for at least part of the case evaluation process. The lawyer will need to explain to the family member or friend his professional duties to his client of loyalty, confidentiality and avoidance of conflicts of interest.

Keywords

Supra Note Adult Child Legal Representative Life Planning Undue Influence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bala N (2005) Family law and the older Canadian. In: Soden A (ed) Advising the older client. Lexis Nexis Butterworths, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengston VL, Giarrasso R, Mabry JB, Silverstein M (2002) Solidarity, conflict and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? J Marriage Fam 64:568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butterwick SJ, Hormel PA, Ingo Keilitz I (2001) Evaluating mediation as a means of resolving adult guardianship cases. Center for Social Gerontology, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleming RB, Morgan RC (2001) Lawyer’s ethical dilemmas: a “normal” relationship when representing demented clients and their families. Ga Law Rev 35:735Google Scholar
  5. Foxmen B, Mariani K (2010) Introduction to elder mediation. In: Using mediation to resolve disputes involving the elderly. Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 17Google Scholar
  6. Gary SN (1997) Mediation and the elderly: using mediation to resolve probate disputes over guardianship and inheritance. Wake Forest Law Rev 32:397Google Scholar
  7. Gibson JW, Hartley BB (2006) The dynamic of aging families. Cultivating Change LLCGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman R, Peng I (1996) The East Asian welfare states: peripatetic learning, adaptive change, and nation-building. In: Esping-Andersen G (ed) Welfare states in transition. Sage, London, pp 192–224Google Scholar
  9. Hancock L (2002) The care crunch: changing work, families and welfare in Australia. Crit Soc Pol 22(1):119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hull IM (2005) Advising families on succession planning: the high price of not talking. Lexis Nexis Butterworths, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  11. Larsen R, Thorpe C (2006) Elder mediation: optimizing major family transitions. Marquette Elder Advisor 7–2:293Google Scholar
  12. Lowenstein A, Bengtson VL (eds) (2003) Global aging and challenges to families. Aldine de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Mariani K, Begler AL (2008) Mediation as a tool for elder care planning. In: 4th Annual ADR Institute. Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 270Google Scholar
  14. McGuire SC, Macdonald RA (1996) Small claims court cant. Osgoode Hall Law J 34(3):550Google Scholar
  15. Park M, Wood E, Gottlich V (1992) Developing a legal services program policy on alternative dispute resolution: important considerations for older clients and clients with disabilities. Clearinghouse Rev:635Google Scholar
  16. Piccini-Roy M (2005) General planning for the older client: a case management and the multidisciplinary approach. In: Soden A (ed) Advising the older client. Lexis Nexis Butterworths, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. Radford MF (2001–2002) Is the use of mediation appropriate in adult guardianship cases? Stetson Law Rev 31:611Google Scholar
  18. Ramesh M (2004) Review article: issues in globalisation and social welfare in Asia. Soc Pol Soc 3(3):321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sabatino CP (2000) Representing a client with diminished capacity: how do you know it and what do you do about it? J Am Acad Matrim Law 16:481Google Scholar
  20. Sabatino CP, Basinger SL (2000) Competency: reforming our legal fictions. J Ment Health Aging 6–2:119Google Scholar
  21. Silberfeld M, Fish A (1994) When the mind fails: a guide to dealing with incompetency. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  22. Soden A (2005) Dilemmas in an elder law practice. In: Soden A (ed) Advising the older client. Lexis Nexis Butterworths, Toronto (second edition 2012)Google Scholar
  23. Takahashi M (2004) Beyond crisis and dissonance: the restructuring of the Japanese welfare state under globalism. Soc Pol Soc 3(3):283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tilse C, Wilson J, Rosenman L (2005) Minding the money: a growing responsibility for informal carers. Aging Soc 25(02):215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wood EF (2001) Dispute resolution and dementia: seeking solutions. Ga Law Rev 35:785Google Scholar
  26. Wood EF, Karp N (1994) Mediation-reframing care conflicts in nursing homes. Generations 54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Law, Policy and AgingMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations