Abstract
Circadian clocks are autonomous oscillators entrained by external Zeitgebers such as light–dark and temperature cycles. On the cellular level, rhythms are generated by negative transcriptional feedback loops. In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the anterior part of the hypothalamus plays the role of the central circadian pacemaker. Coupling between individual neurons in the SCN leads to precise self-sustained oscillations even in the absence of external signals. These neuronal rhythms orchestrate the phasing of circadian oscillations in peripheral organs. Altogether, the mammalian circadian system can be regarded as a network of coupled oscillators. In order to understand the dynamic complexity of these rhythms, mathematical models successfully complement experimental investigations. Here we discuss basic ideas of modeling on three different levels (1) rhythm generation in single cells by delayed negative feedbacks, (2) synchronization of cells via external stimuli or cell–cell coupling, and (3) optimization of chronotherapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abraham U, Granada AE, Westermark PO, Heine M, Kramer A, Herzel H (2010) Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks. Mol Syst Biol 6:438
Andersen L, Mackey M (2001) Resonance in periodic chemotherapy: a case study of acute myelogenous leukemia. J Theor Biol 209:113–130
Aton S, Colwell C, Harmar A, Waschek J, Herzog E (2005) Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mediates circadian rhythmicity and synchrony in mammalian clock neurons. Nat Neurosci 8:476–483
Ballesta A, Dulong S, Abbara C, Cohen B, Okyar A, Clairambault J, Levi F (2011) A combined experimental and mathematical approach for molecular-based optimization of irinotecan circadian delivery. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002143
Balsalobre A, Damiola F, Schibler U (1998) A serum shock induces circadian gene expression in mammalian tissue culture cells. Cell 93:929–937
Basdevant C, Clairambault J, Lévi F (2005) Optimisation of time-scheduled regimen for anti-cancer drug infusion. ESAIM Math Model Numer Anal 39:1069–1086
Becker-Weimann S, Wolf J, Herzel H, Kramer A (2004) Modeling feedback loops of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Biophys J 87:3023–3034
Bellet M, Sassone-Corsi P (2010) Mammalian circadian clock and metabolism–the epigenetic link. J Cell Sci 123:3837–3848
Bell-Pedersen D, Cassone V, Earnest D, Golden S, Hardin P, Thomas T, Zoran M (2005) Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: lessons from diverse organisms. Nat Rev Genet 6:544–556
Bernard S, Bernard B, Lévi F, Herzel H (2010) Tumor growth rate determines the timing of optimal chronomodulated treatment schedules. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000712
Bordyugov G, Granada A, Herzel H (2011) How coupling determines the entrainment of circadian clocks. Eur Phys J B 82:227–234
Brown SA, Azzi A (2013) Peripheral circadian oscillators in mammals. In: Kramer A, Merrow M (eds) Circadian clocks, vol 217, Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg
Brown S, Zumbrunn G, Fleury-Olela F, Preitner N, Schibler U (2002) Rhythms of mammalian body temperature can sustain peripheral circadian clocks. Curr Biol 12:1574–1583
Buhr ED, Takahashi JS (2013) Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. In: Kramer A, Merrow M (eds) Circadian clocks, vol 217, Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg
Buhr ED, Yoo SH, Takahashi JS (2010) Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillators. Science 330:379–385
Chauhan A, Lorenzen S, Herzel H, Bernard S (2011) Regulation of mammalian cell cycle progression in the regenerating liver. J Theor Biol 283:103–112
Daan S, Berde C (1978) Two coupled oscillators: simulations of the circadian pacemaker in mammalian activity rhythms. J Theor Biol 70:297–313
Derendorf H, Meibohm B (1999) Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives. Pharm Res 16:176–185
Dibner C, Sage D, Unser M, Bauer C, d’Eysmond T, Naef F, Schibler U (2008) Circadian gene expression is resilient to large fluctuations in overall transcription rates. EMBO J 28:123–134
Ebeling W, Herzel H, Selkov EE (1983) The influence of noise on an oscillating glycolytic model. Studia Biophysica 98:147–154
Enright J (1980) Temporal precision in circadian systems: a reliable neuronal clock from unreliable components? Science 209:1542–1545
Forger D (2011) Signal processing in cellular clocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:4281–4285
Forger DB, Peskin CS (2003) A detailed predictive model of the mammalian circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14806–14811
George E. P. Box and Norman Richard Draper Wiley (1987) Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. Technical report, Defence Technical Information Center Document
Glass L, Mackey M (1988) From clocks to chaos: the rhythms of life. University Press, Princeton, NJ
Gonze D, Bernard S, Waltermann C, Kramer A, Herzel H (2005) Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circadian oscillators. Biophys J 89:120–129
Goodwin B (1965) Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. Adv Enzyme Regul 3:425–428
Gorbacheva V, Kondratov R, Zhang R, Cherukuri S, Gudkov A, Takahashi J, Antoch M (2005) Circadian sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic agent cyclophosphamide depends on the functional status of the CLOCK/BMAL1 transactivation complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3407–3412
Granada AE, Herzel H (2009) How to achieve fast entrainment? The timescale to synchronization. PLoS One 4:e7057
Griffith J (1968) Mathematics of cellular control processes. I: Negative feedback to one gene. J Theor Biol 20:202–208
Hastings M, Reddy A, Maywood E et al (2003) A clockwork web: circadian timing in brain and periphery, in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:649–661
Herzog ED, Aton SJ, Numano R, Sakaki Y, Tei H (2004) Temporal precision in the mammalian circadian system: a reliable clock from less reliable neurons. J Biol Rhythms 19:35–46
Hirata H, Yoshiura S, Ohtsuka T, Bessho Y, Harada T, Yoshikawa K, Kageyama R (2002) Oscillatory expression of the bHLH factor Hes1 regulated by a negative feedback loop. Science 298:840–843
Hodgkin A, Huxley A (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544
Hoffmann A, Baltimore D (2006) Circuitry of nuclear factor κB signaling. Immunol Rev 210:171–186
Honma S, Nakamura W, Shirakawa T, Honma K (2004) Diversity in the circadian periods of single neurons of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus depends on nuclear structure and intrinsic period. Neurosci Lett 358:173–176
Hrushesky W, Von Roemeling R, Sothern R (1989) Circadian chronotherapy: from animal experiments to human cancer chemotherapy. In: Lemmer B (ed) Chronopharamacology: cellular and biochemical interactions, vol 720. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 439–473
Hunt T, Sassone-Corsi P (2007) Riding tandem: circadian clocks and the cell cycle. Cell 129:461–464
Keller M, Mazuch J, Abraham U, Eom G, Herzog E, Volk H, Kramer A, Maier B (2009) A circadian clock in macrophages controls inflammatory immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:21407–21412
Ko C, Yamada Y, Welsh D, Buhr E, Liu A, Zhang E, Ralph M, Kay S, Forger D, Takahashi J (2010) Emergence of noise-induced oscillations in the central circadian pacemaker. PLoS Biol 8:e1000513
Korenčič A, Bordyugov G, Košir R, Rozman D, Goličik M, Herzel H (2012) The interplay of cis-regulator elements rules circadian rhythms in mouse liver. PLoS One 7(11):e0046835
Kronauer RE, Czeisler CA, Pilato SF, Moore-Ede MC, Weitzman ED (1982) Mathematical model of the human circadian system with two interacting oscillators. Am J Physiol 242:R3–17
Lahav G, Rosenfeld N, Sigal A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Levine A, Elowitz M, Alon U (2004) Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat Genet 36:147–150
Leloup JC, Goldbeter A (2003) Toward a detailed computational model for the mammalian circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7051–7056
Lévi F, Schibler U (2007) Circadian rhythms: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 47:593–628
Lévi F, Zidani R, Misset J et al (1997) Randomised multicentre trial of chronotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 350:681–686
Lévi F, Altinok A, Clairambault J, Goldbeter A (2008) Implications of circadian clocks for the rhythmic delivery of cancer therapeutics. Philos Trans R Soc A 366:3575–3598
Lewis J (2003) Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: a simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator. Curr Biol 13:1398–1408
Liu AC, Welsh DK, Ko CH, Tran HG, Zhang EE, Priest AA, Buhr ED, Singer O, Meeker K, Verma IM, Doyle FJ, Takahashi JS, Kay SA (2007) Intercellular coupling confers robustness against mutations in the SCN circadian clock network. Cell 129:605–616
Long M, Jutras M, Connors B, Burwell R (2005) Electrical synapses coordinate activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nat Neurosci 8:61–66
MacDonald N, Cannings C, Hoppensteadt F (2008) Biological delay systems: linear stability theory. University Press, Cambridge, MA
Mackey M, Glass L (1977) Oscillation and chaos in physiological control systems. Science 197:287–289
Minami Y, Ode KL, Ueda HR (2013) Mammalian circadian clock; the roles of transcriptional repression and delay. In: Kramer A, Merrow M (eds) Circadian clocks, vol 217, Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg
Mirsky H, Liu A, Welsh D, Kay S, Doyle F (2009) A model of the cell-autonomous mammalian circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:11107–11112
Morelli LG, Jülicher F (2007) Precision of genetic oscillators and clocks. Phys Rev Lett 98:228101
Mormont M, Levi F (2003) Cancer chronotherapy: principles, applications, and perspectives. Cancer 97:155–169
Musiek ES, FitzGerald GA (2013) Molecular clocks in pharmacology. In: Kramer A, Merrow M (eds) Circadian clocks, vol 217, Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg
Nagoshi E, Saini C, Bauer C, Laroche T, Naef F, Schibler U (2004) Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells. Cell 119:693–705
Nelson D, Ihekwaba A, Elliott M, Johnson J, Gibney C, Foreman B, Nelson G, See V, Horton C, Spiller D et al (2004) Oscillations in NF-κB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 306:704–708
olde Scheper T, Klinkenberg D, Pennartz C, van Pelt J et al (1999) A mathematical model for the intracellular circadian rhythm generator. J Neurosci 19:40–47
Ortiz-Tudela E, Mteyrek A, Ballesta A, Innominato PF, Lévi F (2013) Cancer chronotherapeutics: experimental, theoretical and clinical aspects. In: Kramer A, Merrow M (eds) Circadian clocks, vol 217, Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg
Oster H, Yasui A, Van Der Horst G, Albrecht U (2002) Disruption of mCry2 restores circadian rhythmicity in mPer2 mutant mice. Genes Dev 16:2633–2638
Pavlidis T (1973) Biological oscillators: their mathematical analysis. Academic, Waltham, MA
Pfeuty B, Thommen Q, Lefranc M (2011) Robust entrainment of circadian oscillators requires specific phase response curves. Biophys J 100:2557–2565
Raj A, van Oudenaarden A (2008) Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135:216–226
Raser J, O’Shea E (2005) Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309:2010–2013
Relógio A, Westermark P, Wallach T, Schellenberg K, Kramer A, Herzel H (2011) Tuning the mammalian circadian clock: robust synergy of two loops. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002309
Reppert S, Weaver D (2001) Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Physiol 63:647–676
Robles M, Boyault C, Knutti D, Padmanabhan K, Weitz C (2010) Identification of RACK1 and protein kinase Cα as integral components of the mammalian circadian clock. Science 327:463–466
Ruoff P, Vinsjevik M, Monnerjahn C, Rensing L (2001) The Goodwin model: simulating the effect of light pulses on the circadian sporulation rhythm of Neurospora crassa. J Theor Biol 209:29–42
Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W, Selbach M (2011) Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473:337–342
Seidel H, Herzel H (1998) Bifurcations in a nonlinear model of the baroreceptor-cardiac reflex. Physica D 115:145–160
Sharova LV, Sharov AA, Nedorezov T, Piao Y, Shaik N, Ko MSH (2009) Database for mRNA half-life of 19 977 genes obtained by DNA microarray analysis of pluripotent and differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA Res 16:45–58
Slat E, Freeman GM, Herzog ED (2013) The clock in the brain: neurons, glia and networks in daily rhythms. In: Kramer A, Merrow M (eds) Circadian clocks, vol 217, Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg
Smith H (2010) An introduction to delay differential equations with applications to the life sciences. Springer, Heidelberg
Smolen P, Hardin P, Lo B, Baxter D, Byrne J (2004) Simulation of Drosophila circadian oscillations, mutations, and light responses by a model with VRI, PDP-1, and CLK. Biophys J 86:2786–2802
Spörl F, Schellenberg K, Blatt T, Wenck H, Wittern K, Schrader A, Kramer A (2010) A circadian clock in HaCaT keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 131:338–348
Stokkan K, Yamazaki S, Tei H, Sakaki Y, Menaker M (2001) Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feeding. Science 291:490–439
Tyson J, Hong C, Thron CD, Novak B (1999) A simple model of circadian rhythms based on dimerization and proteolysis of PER and TIM. Biophys J 77:2411–2417
Ukai H, Ueda HR (2010) Systems biology of mammalian circadian clocks. Annu Rev Physiol 72:579–603
Vanselow K, Vanselow JT, Westermark PO, Reischl S, Maier B, Korte T, Herrmann A, Herzel H, Schlosser A, Kramer A (2006) Differential effects of PER2 phosphorylation: molecular basis for the human familial advanced sleep phase syndrome (FASPS). Genes Dev 20:2660–2672
Webb A, Angelo N, Huettner J, Herzog E (2009) Intrinsic, nondeterministic circadian rhythm generation in identified mammalian neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:16493–16498
Welsh DK, Logothetis DE, Meister M, Reppert SM (1995) Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms. Neuron 14:697–706
Welsh DK, Takahashi JS, Kay SA (2010) Suprachiasmatic nucleus: cell autonomy and network properties. Annu Rev Physiol 72:551–577
Westermark PO, Welsh DK, Okamura H, Herzel H (2009) Quantification of circadian rhythms in single cells. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000580
Wever R (1965) A mathematical model for circadian rhythms. Circadian Clocks 47:47–63
Winfree A (1980) The geometry of biological time. Springer, New York
Yagita K, Okamura H (2000) Forskolin induces circadian gene expression of rPer1, rPer2 and dbp in mammalian rat-1 fibroblasts. FEBS Lett 465:79–82
Zhang EE, Kay SA (2010) Clocks not winding down: unravelling circadian networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:764–776
Zhang E, Liu A, Hirota T, Miraglia L, Welch G, Pongsawakul P, Liu X, Atwood A, Huss J III, Janes J et al (2009) A genome-wide RNAi screen for modifiers of the circadian clock in human cells. Cell 139:199–210
Zielke N, Kim K, Tran V, Shibutani S, Bravo M, Nagarajan S, van Straaten M, Woods B, von Dassow G, Rottig C et al (2011) Control of Drosophila endocycles by E2F and CRL4CDT2. Nature 480:123–127
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Jana Hinners and Anna Erzberger for their contributions to numerical simulations, Adrian E. Granada, Michael Mackey, and Francis Levi for fruitful discussions, and DFG (SFB 618, InKomBio) and BMBF (ColoNet, Circage FKZ 0315899) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A: Oscillations Due to Delayed Negative Feedback
1.1 A.1 The Model
One of the simplest models for a self-suppressing gene reads
Here, the time-dependent state variable x(t) corresponds to the mRNA level of a clock gene, for instance, Per2 at time t. The positive parameter d is the mRNA degradation rate, large values correspond to a rapid degradation, whereas small values model more stable mRNAs. Parameter a determines the basal transcription rate in the absence of the inhibitor.
The self-inhibition is modeled in the following way: For simplicity, we consciously refrain from modeling all intermediate steps, which lead from the mRNA to its protein product translocated back into the nucleus. We merely postulate that the nuclear protein abundance is proportional with the factor b to the amount of mRNA τ hours earlier. The power n is the cooperativity index, which in the case of dimerization is given by n = 2. The self-inhibition is reflected by the delayed state variable x(t − τ) appearing in the denominator. Its high values decrease the net production rate of the mRNA \( {{{\mathrm{ dx(t)}}}}/{{ {\mathrm{ dt}}}} \). Asymptotically, for very large values of x(t − τ), the production rate of mRNA tends to zero.
A typical choice of parameters is given by the following values: The basal transcription rate can be set to a = 1, because we have arbitrary units, the degradation rate to d = 0.2 h−1, which corresponds to a typical mRNA half-life (Sharova et al. 2009), and the time delay to τ = 8 h, which is a characteristic delay between Per2 and phosphorylated nuclear PER2.
We stress that the model given by Eq. (3) is qualitative and we do not expect an exact quantitative correspondence of its predictions with the numerical values from experiments. However, many features of the oscillations can be predicted by the model equation. For example, parameter ranges of the delay τ and the degradation rate can be determined that allow the generation of oscillations.
1.2 A.2 Steady State and Its Stability
We generalize our model given by Eq. (1) to a one-dimensional DDE as follows:
where τ is a time delay, g(·) is a nonlinear function, and d > 0 is a degradation constant. An example is the nonlinear feedback in the form of
with the parameters a, b, n as discussed above.
A steady state of Eq. (4) satisfy \( \frac{\text{$\scriptstyle {\mathrm{ d}x(t)}$}}{\text{$\scriptstyle {\mathrm{ d}t}$}}=0 \) and is given by the nonlinear equation
which is in the case of Eq. (5) equivalent to
This is a nonlinear equation, which can be analytically solved only for small values of the exponent n. Generally, for arbitrary n, the steady state can be determined numerically.
Suppose that we have solved the steady state equation and the equilibrium is given by x = x 0. We are now interested in the question of the stability of x 0: that is, whether the system in the course of time will return back to equilibrium x 0 or depart from it. For this purpose, we introduce the ansatz
with a small function of time y(t), which is the deviation of x(t) from its steady state value x 0. In order to determine the stability of x 0, we need to see, whether the derivation, y(t), would grow or decay in time. We emphasize that we are interested in what happens in the intermediate neighborhood of x 0, which implies that y(t) is small.
Let us introduce our ansatz into the equations. We have for the left-hand side of Eq. (4)
and correspondingly for its right-hand side by using a Taylor expansion up to the first order:
Here, J is the slope of the nonlinear function g in the steady state x 0 given by
Putting both sides together results in
This is a DDE for the unknown function y(t). This equation is linear, and we can solve it by an exponential ansatz
with the unknown complex number λ. The last ansatz, when substituted in Eq. (8), leads to
and after dividing by y 0eλt it results in the transcendental characteristic equation for λ:
If we find a value λ which solves Eq. (9), the function y(t) = y 0eλt would be a solution to Eq. (8). The growth or decay of y(t) = y 0eλt is determined by the sign of the real part of λ. If Re λ < 0, the function y(t) will decay in the course of time, which would correspond to a stable steady state x 0. If Re λ > 0, the function y(t) grows, which means that the system departs from steady state x 0 and the latter is unstable.
To sum up, given steady state x 0, we have to solve Eq. (9) for the unknown λ, whose real part determines the stability of x 0. Note that Eq. (9) depends on the steady state x 0 through J, on the value of the time delay τ, and on the degradation rate d. Thus we expect that the stability of the steady state can be changed by tuning any of those parameters.
1.3 A.3 Oscillation Onset (Hopf Bifurcation)
Here, we are interested in a special situation, where the complex exponent λ has a zero real part. This corresponds to a parameter set, for which the stability of the steady state changes: if we change one of the parameters slightly, the real part will become nonzero and the steady state would either loose or gain stability, depending on the direction of the parameter change.
We introduce λ = μ + iω, which, when substituted in Eq. (9), results in
We are interested in the situation when μ = 0, since it is associated with a change of stability of the steady state. At the same time when the steady state looses its stability, a small limit cycle emerges from the steady state. The period T of this limit cycle is close to 2π/ω. This scenario is known as a Hopf bifurcation. Going on with our calculations, the condition μ = 0 simplifies the above two equations to
Using cos2 (ωτ) + sin2 (ωτ) = 1, we have
and \( d=\sqrt{{{J^2}-{\omega^2}}} \). This in turn leads to the expression for the critical value of delay:
Moreover, we can express \( \omega =\sqrt{{{J^2}-{d^2}}} \) and have cos (ωτ) = d/J, which gives the value for the critical delay
We can analyze this equation a bit further: Owing to d ≥ 0 and J < 0, d/J is negative or zero. Hence, arccos (d/J) assumes values in between π/2 (corresponding to d/J = 0) and π (corresponding to d/J = −1). Thus, the value of τ is in between \( {{ 2{ \pi }}}{{ /\omega }} \) and \( {{ {\pi }}}{\rm{ /\omega }} \), which is exactly one-fourth to one-half of \( T={{ {2\pi }}}{\rm{ /\omega }} \). Here, T approximates the period of the limit cycle, which emerges from the steady state in a Hopf bifurcation with λ = 0 + iω.
Our analytical calculations allowed us to specify the parameters where a Hopf bifurcation occurs: From \( J=\sqrt{{{d^2}+{\omega^2}}} \) we see that a certain slope is needed. Furthermore, the delay must exceed a quarter of a period (6 h for circadian rhythms). Finally, the period is approximately proportional to the delay.
Appendix B: Explicit Delays Versus Reaction Chains
In the main text we studied the DDE
If x(t) represents the mRNA of a clock gene, the transcriptional inhibition is executed by its time-delayed value x(t − τ). In reality, the mRNA is spliced, exported, and translated to a protein. The protein forms complexes, can be posttranslationally modified, and will be translocated to the nucleus, where it regulates transcription. This series of events can be modeled in principle by studying all the corresponding intermediate concentrations and the resulting inhibitory complex. Since many quantitative details are not known, we introduced here the shortcut with an explicit delay.
It turns out that variables with explicit delays can be approximated by a chain of k intermediate auxiliary variables y i (t):
If we choose \( h=k/\tau \), the chain of ODEs approximates the DDE (10) [this transformation is called the linear chain trick (MacDonald et al. 2008; Smith 2010)]. Here we sketch a short explanation for that claim.
We begin by ad hoc introducing a family of gamma functions G h,q by
A first useful observation is that the time derivative of the gamma functions satisfies the following relation
which formally reminds the last k equations in (11). Using this result, a straight-forward differentiation shows that functions, y q (t), given by the convolution integrals,
indeed solve the last k equations in (11).
We now turn to the properties of y k (t). It is formed by convolution integrals of x(t) with the gamma function G h,k (t). These functions have mean value at \( t=k/h\) and variance proportional to k. Thus, for large k, the functions G h,k (t) become narrower, approximating a peak centered at \( k/h \).
In the above integral (12) for q = k, we aim at localizing x(s) at the time moment t − τ by properly choosing G h,k (t − s). The condition s = t − τ results in G h,k (t − s) = G h,k (τ). By an appropriate choice of parameter h, we tune the gamma function in such a way that its mean value is at the delayed time point t − τ. Owing that the mean value of G h,k (τ) is at \( \tau =k/h \), this leads to the sought condition for h: \( h=k/\tau \). We conclude that the solution of the last equation of system (11), given by
with \( h=k/\tau \) indeed approximates the delayed value of x: y k (t) ≈ x(t − τ). The approximation becomes better for larger chain lengths due to narrower G h,k for large k.
These calculations illustrate that chains of ODEs as studied in most clock models are closely related to DDEs analyzed above. The fact that long chains (i.e., large number k of the ODE equations) lead to sharper delays could be related to the observation that many posttranslational modifications (Vanselow et al. 2006), complex formations (Zhang et al. 2009; Robles et al. 2010), and epigenetic modification (Bellet and Sassone-Corsi 2010) are involved in generation of 24 h rhythms. We also refer to Forger (2011) for a somewhat similar study of the Goodwin model as a chain of three interconnected steps.
Appendix C: Modeling Details of Single Cell Oscillators
The dynamics of single cells was described either by a noisy limit cycle model or a noise-driven weakly damped oscillator model. For N cells, the governing deterministic differential equations read:
Here, λ i is the radial relaxation rate, τ i is the cell’s period, and A i is the cell’s signal amplitude. All three parameters were estimated from experimental data as explained in (Westermark et al. 2009). Limit cycle oscillators have a nonzero amplitude A i , whereas for damped oscillators we set A i = 0. The cell stochasticity was modeled by Gaussian noise sources added to the right-hand sides of Eq. (13). The variances of the noise terms were also estimated from experimental data as in (Westermark et al. 2009). For time integration of the resulting stochastic differential equation, we used the Euler–Murayama method.
For both limit cycle oscillators and weakly damped ones, three simulation protocols were realized.
-
Synchronization by a pulse: At a certain time moment, we simultaneously shifted each oscillator in a specific direction by 120 dimensionless units (see Fig. 4).
-
External periodic forcing: For the results presented in Fig. 5, we subjected oscillators to an external periodic force with a 24 h period and an amplitude of 0.5 dimensionless units. This driving force is much smaller than the typical oscillator amplitude of 10–20 (dimensionless units).
-
Synchronization via mean field: In the third protocol (see Fig. 6), the oscillators were subjected to the mean field Z, which resulted from averaging across the ensemble:
For linear damped oscillators, a saturation of the mean field at 20 dimensionless units was introduced in order to avoid amplitude explosion due to the linearity of the model.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bordyugov, G., Westermark, P.O., Korenčič, A., Bernard, S., Herzel, H. (2013). Mathematical Modeling in Chronobiology. In: Kramer, A., Merrow, M. (eds) Circadian Clocks. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 217. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25949-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25950-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)