• Daniele  Inaudi


Flowlines—pipelines or gas lines often cross hazardous environmental areas, from the point of view natural exposures such as landslides and earthquakes and from the point of view of third party influences such as vandalism or obstruction. These hazards can significantly change the original functioning of the flowline, leading to damaging, leakage and failure with serious economic and ecologic consequences. Furthermore, the operational conditions of the pipeline itself can induce additional wearing or even damage due to corrosion, erosion and fatigue. This chapter presents methods, techniques and their application to structural health monitoring and performance control.


Fiber Bragg Grate Structural Health Monitoring Liquid Flow Rate Optical Fibre Sensor Leakage Detection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author is indebted to the following persons and organizations for providing information on the cited application examples: Snam Rete Gas (Italy), ENI (Italy), Princeton University (USA), TransitGas (Switzerland), Tecnomare (Italy), PraOil (Italy), Francesco Gasparoni, Branko Glisic, Francesco Bruni, Maurizio Zecchin, Riccardo Belli, Daniele Posenato, Roberto Walder, Angelo Figini. Please refer to the cited references for additional details about the specific tests.


  1. 1.
    Thévenaz, L., Niklès, M., Fellay, A., Facchini, M., Robert, P.H.: Truly distributed strain and temperature sensing using embedded optial fibers. SPIE conference on smart structures and materials, vol. 3330, pp. 301–314 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Niklès, M., Briffod, F., Burke, R., Lyons, G.: Greatly extended distance pipeline monitoring using fibre optics. In: Proceedings of OMAE05, 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Halkidiki, Greece, 12–17 June 2005Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glisic, B., Inaudi, D.: Sensing tape for easy integration of optical fiber sensors in composite structures. 16th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Nara, Japan, vol. 1, pp. 291–298, 13–17 Oct 2003Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inaudi, D., Glisic, B.: Distributed fibre optic sensing for long-range pipeline monitoring. The 3rd International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure—SHMII-3, 13–16 Nov 2007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inaudi, D., Belli, R., Walder, R.: Detection and localization of micro-leakages using distributed fiber optic sensing. 7th International Pipeline Conference, IPC2008, 29 Sept–3 Oct 2008, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inaudi, D., Belli, R., Gasparoni, F., Bruni, F., Parente, A., Zecchin, M.: Detection and localization of micro and multiphase leakages using distributed fiber optic sensing. 3rd Iranian Pipe and Pipelines Conference, Tehran, Iran, 25 May 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glisic, B., Yao, Y., Oberste-Ufer, K.: Assessment of buried pipelines health condition using distributed fiber optic sensors. 5th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure (SHMII-5), Cancún, México, 11–15 Dec 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. SMARTEC SAMannoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations