Information Systems in Transportation

Chapter

Abstract

The increasing significance of information technology as well as application networks for varying areas, e.g. aviation and shipping as well as automobile and rail traffic are characteristic traits of an information society (cf. Harms and Luckhardt 2005). Further developments in the fields of microelectronics, computer, software and network technology, but also display technology, etc. are the driving force of this progression.

Keywords

Road Traffic Information Quality Situational Awareness Flight Phase Federal Aviation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akyol, S., Libuda, L., & Kraiss, K.F. (2001). Multimodale Benutzung adaptiver KFZ-Bordsysteme. In T. Jürgensohn & K. P. Timpe (Eds.), Kraftfahrzeugführung (pp. 137–154). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anstey, T. W. (2004). Electronic documentation and the challenge of transitioning from paper. Proceedings of the HCI-Aero. Workshop electronic documentation: Towards the next generation, EURISCO International, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, Y., Ramu, J.-P., & Reiss, M. (2004). Future use of electronic manuals in aviation. Proceedings of the HCI-Aero. Workshop electronic documentation: Towards the next generation. EURISCO International, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  4. Bengler, K. (2001). Aspekte multimodaler Bedienung und Anzeige im Automobil. In T. Jürgensohn & K. P. Timpe (Eds.), Kraftfahrzeugführung (pp. 195–205). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blattner, M., Sumikawa, D., & Greenberg, R. (1989). Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles. Human Computer Interaction, 4, 11–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bubb, H. (2001). Haptik im Kraftfahrzeug. In T. Jürgensohn & K. P. Timpe (Eds.), Kraftfahrzeugführung (pp. 155–175). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra, D. C. (2003). A tool for structured evaluation of electronic flight bag usability. Proceedings of the 22nd digital avionics systems conference, Indianapolis, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
  8. Chandra, D. C., & Mangold, S. J. (2000). Human factors considerations in the design and evaluation of electronic flight bags (EFBs) Version 1: Basic functions. Report No DOT-VNTSC-FAA-00-2 MA USDOT. Cambridge: Volpe Center.Google Scholar
  9. Chandra, D. C., Yeh, M., & Riley, V. (2004). Designing a tool to assess the usability of electronic flight bags (EFBs). Report No DOT/FAA/AR-04/38 MA USDOT. Cambridge: Volpe Center.Google Scholar
  10. Chandra, D. C., Yeh, M., Riley, V., & Mangold, S. J. (2003). Human factors considerations in the design and evaluation of electronic flight bags (EFBs). http://www.volpe.dot.gov/hf/aviation/efb/docs/efb_version2.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  11. Dahmen-Zimmer, K., Huber, M., Kaiser, I., Kostka, M., Scheufler, I., Pieculla, W., Praxenthaler, M., & Zimmer, A. (1999). Definition und Validierung von Kriterien für die Ablenkungswirkung von MMI-Lösungen. Endbericht MoTiV – MMI AP/5, Regensburg.Google Scholar
  12. Dahmen-Zimmer, K., & Zimmer, A. (1997). Situationsbezogene Sicherheitskenngrößen im Straßenverkehr. Bergisch Gladbach: BASt.Google Scholar
  13. Fang, X., & Rau, P. L. (2003). Culture differences in design of portal sites. Ergonomics, 46, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular (FAAC). (2003). Guidelines for the certification, airworthiness, and operational approval of electronic flight bag computing devices. Report No FAA AC 120- 76A. http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/B5DE2A1CAC2E1F7B86256CED00786888?OpenDocument&Highlight=efb. Accessed 21 Aug 2011.
  15. Fischhoff, B., MacGregor, D., & Blackshaw, L. (1987). Creating categories for databases. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 27, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzsimmons, F. S. (2002). The electronic flight bag: A multi-function tool for the modern cockpit. Institute for Information Technology Applications. United States Air Force Academy Colorado IITA Research Publication 2 Information Series. http://www.usafa.edu/df/iita/Publications/The%20Electronic%20Flight%20Bag.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  17. Galbreath, J. (1992). The educational buzzword of the 1990’s: Multimedia, or is it hypermedia, or interactive multimedia, or…? Educational Technology, 4, 32.Google Scholar
  18. Geer, D. (2004). Will gesture-recognition technology point the way? Computer, 37, 20–23.Google Scholar
  19. Gerdes, H. (1997). Lernen mit Text und Hypertext. Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, J. J., Olum, P. & Rosenblatt, F. (1955) Parallax and perspective during airplane landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grunwald, M., & Krause, F. (2001). Haptikdesign im Fahrzeugbau. In M. Grunwald & L. Beyer (Eds.), Der bewegte Sinn. Grundlagen und Anwendungen zur haptischen Wahrnehmung (pp. 171–176). Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  23. Haak, R. (2002). Das Human Faktor Concept in der Luftfahrt. Technische Mitteilungen (Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitssicherheit), 95(2), 104–116.Google Scholar
  24. Harms, I., & Luckhardt, H.-D. (2005). Virtuelles Handbuch Informationswissenschaft. Der Gegenstand der Informationswissenschaft. http://is.uni-sb.de/studium/handbuch/kap7.html. Accessed 18 Aug 2011.
  25. Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command. (2002). Flight manuals transformation program concept of operations. Ohio: Operations Division, Directorate of Operations, Wright-Patterson AFB.Google Scholar
  26. Helfert, M., Foley, O., Ge, M., & Cappiello, C. (2009). Analysing the effect of security on information quality dimensions. The 17th European conference on information systems, Verona, pp. 2785–2797.Google Scholar
  27. Hoxmeier, J. (1997a). A framework for assessing database quality. Proceedings of the workshop on behavioral models and design transformations: Issues and opportunities in conceptual modeling. Proceedings of the ACM 16th international conference on conceptual modeling, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  28. Hoxmeier, J. A. (1997b). A framework for assessing database quality. Proceedings of the association of computing machinery ER 97 conference.Google Scholar
  29. Issing, L. J., & Klimsa, P. (1997). Information und Lernen mit Multimedia. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlagsunion.Google Scholar
  30. Johannsen, G. (1990). Fahrzeugführung. In K. Graf Hoyos (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (pp. 426–454). Göttingen: Ingenieurpsychologie Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  31. Krcmar, H. (2003). Informationsmanagement. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Kroenke, D. M. (2008). Experiencing MIS. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Kubicek, H., Horst, U., Redder, V., Schmid, U., Schumann, I., Taube, W., & Wagner, H. (1997). www.stadtinfo.de Ein Leitfaden für die Entwicklung von Stadtinformationen im Internet. Heidelberg: Hüthig Verlag.
  34. Kuhlen, R. (1990). Zum Stand pragmatischer Forschung in der Informationswissenschaft. In J. Herget & R. Kuhlen (Eds.), Pragmatische Aspekte beim Entwurf und Betrieb von Informationssystemen. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  35. Kuhlen, R. (1997). Hypertext. In M. Bruder et al. (Eds.), Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. KF Saur-Verlag: München.Google Scholar
  36. Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1972). Die Informationswissenschaften. Ihre Ansätze, Probleme, Methoden und ihr Ausbau in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. München/Wien: Oldenbourg-Verlag. http://is.uni-sb.de/studium/kunzrittel.html. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  37. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2008). Essentials of management information systems (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information Management, 40(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luckhardt, H.-D. (2000). Hypertext eine erste Orientierung. In I. Harms, & H.-D. Luckhardt (Eds.), Virtuelles Handbuch Informationswissenschaft. http://is.uni-sb.de/studium/handbuch/exkurs_hyper.html. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  40. Luckhardt, H.-D. (2005). Information retrieval. In I. Harms, & Luckhardt H.-D. (Eds.), Virtuelles Handbuch Informationswissenschaft. http://is.uni-sb.de/studium/handbuch/exkurs_hyper.html. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  41. Madnick, S. E., Lee, Y. W., Wang, R. Y., & Zhu, H. (2009). Overview and framework for data and information quality research. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 1(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, J. (1976). Principles of database management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Mettler, T., Rohner, P., & Baacke, L. (2008). Improving data quality of health information systems: A holistic design-oriented approach. Proceedings of the 16th European conference on information systems, Galway, Ireland, pp. 1883–1893.Google Scholar
  44. Payne, S. J. (2003). Users’ mental models: The very ideas. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Towards a multi-disciplinary science (pp. 135–156). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Price, R., & Shanks, G. (2005). A semiotic information quality framework: Development and comparative analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramu, J.-P. (2002). Task structure methodology for electronic operational documentation. Proceedings of the international conference on human–computer interaction in aeronautics, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp. 62–68.Google Scholar
  47. Ramu, J.-P. (2004a). Electronic operational documentation: From contextualisation towards communication. Proceedings of the HCI-Aero. Workshop electronic documentation: towards the next generation. EURISCO International, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  48. Ramu, J.-P. (2004b). Contextualised operational documentation: An application study in aviation. http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol114/paper10.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2011.
  49. Rossmeier, M., Grabsch, H. P., & Rimini-Döring, M. (2005). Blind flight: Do auditory lane departure warnings attract attention or actually guide action? Proceedings of the 11th international conference on auditory displays (ICAD), ICAD, Limerick, pp. 43–48.Google Scholar
  50. Rumar, K. (1990). The basic driver error: Late detection. Ergonomics, 33, 1281–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schulmeister, R. (2002). Grundlagen hypermedialer Lernsysteme. Theorie - Didaktik – Design. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  52. Sklar, A. E., & Sarter, N. B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stix, G. (1991). Computer-Piloten. Trends in der Verkehrstechnik. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 9, 68–73.Google Scholar
  54. Strong, D., Lee, Y., & Wang, R. (1997). Data quality in contexat. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tergan, S. O. (1995). Hypertext und Hypermedia. Konzepte, Lernmöglichkeiten, Lernprobleme. In L. J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Information und Lernen mit Multimedia Beltz. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlagsunion.Google Scholar
  57. Teuber, R. A. (1999). Organisations- und Informationsgestaltung. Theoretische Grundlagen und integrierte Methoden. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  58. van Heijst, G. (1995). The role of ontologies in knowledge engineering. Amsterdam: Universität Amsterdam, Fakultät der Psychologie.Google Scholar
  59. Verwey, W., & Janssen, W. H. (1988). Route following and driving performance with in-car route guidance systems. IZF-Report No C-14. Soesterberg: TNO Institute for Perception.Google Scholar
  60. Vilimek, R. (2007). Gestaltungsaspekte multimodaler Interaktion im Fahrzeug. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.Google Scholar
  61. Wang, R. Y., Reddy, M. P., & Kon, H. B. (1995). Toward quality data: An attribute-based approach. Decision Support Systems, 5, 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–34.MATHGoogle Scholar
  63. Wierwille, W. W. (1993). Visual and manual demands of in-car controls and displays. In R. Peacock (Ed.), Automotive ergonomics (pp. 299–320). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  64. Wood, S., Cox, R., & Cheng, P. (2006). Attention design: Eight issues to consider. Computers in Human Behaviour, 22, 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zimmer, A. (1998). Anwendbarkeit taktiler Reize für die Informationsverarbeitung. Forschungsbericht des Lehrstuhls für Psychologie II, Universität Regensburg.Google Scholar
  66. Zimmer, A. (2001). Wie intelligent kann/muss ein Auto sein? Anmerkungen aus ingenieurpsychologischer Sicht. In T. Jürgensohn & K. P. Timpe (Eds.), Anwendbarkeit taktiler Reize für die Informationsverarbeitung (pp. 39–55). Forschungsbericht des Lehrstuhls für Psychologie II, Universität Regensburg.Google Scholar
  67. Zmud, R. (1978). Concepts, theories and techniques: An empirical investigation of the dimensionability of the concept of information. Decision Design, 9(2), 187–195.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. Zumbach, J., & Rapp, A. (2001). Wissenserwerb mit Hypermedien: Kognitive Prozesse der Informationsverarbeitung. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie, 63, 27–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.German Air Force Institute of Aviation MedicineManchingGermany

Personalised recommendations