Advertisement

Regional Clustering Tendencies of the Hungarian Automotive and ICT Industries in the First Half of the 2000s

  • Balázs Lengyel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter gives an introduction to regional clustering tendencies of Hungarian automotive and ICT sectors. Regional concentration patterns of these two sectors are shown using various measures (number of firms, number of employees, value added, export value). Regional location quotient is also calculated (LQ) in order to select those regions where clustering might happen and analyse these locations over the first half of the 2000s. The ownership structure is also outlined for every region in the beginning and end of the period. The findings suggest that there is no archetype of clustering tendency in Hungary and that a wide variety of regional dynamics are present in both sectors. One might find that agglomeration economies are strongly affected by the location of foreign-owned companies.

Keywords

Automotive Industry Ownership Structure Regional Cluster Localization Externality Agglomeration Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Antonelli C (1994) Technology districts, localized spillovers, and productivity growth: the Italian evidence on technological externalities in core regions. International Review of Applied Economics, 12, pp. 18–30.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner T (2004) Local Industrial Cluster: Existence, Emergence and Evolution. Routledge, London - New York.Google Scholar
  3. Carter A P (2007) Measurement of the clustering and dispersion of innovation. In Polenske K R (ed) The Economic Geography of Innovation, pp. 13–29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. EC (2002) Enterprise Clusters and Networks. European Commission, DG Enterprise, Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. EC (2005) Towards an European Research Area, Science, Technology and Innovation. Key Figures 2005. European Commission, DG Research, Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. Florida R (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Grosz A (2006) Clusterization processes in the automotive industry. Discussio Papers No. 52. Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobs J (1969) The Economy of Cities. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Ketels C and Sölvell Ö (2005) Clusters in the EU 10 new member countries. Europe INNOVA, Center for Strategy and Competitiveness, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  10. Lengyel B and Cadil V (2009) Innovation policy challenges in transition countries: foreign business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Transition Studies Review 16, 174–188.o.Google Scholar
  11. Lengyel B and Leydesdorff L (2011) Regional innovation systems in Hungary: the failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45, 5, pp. 677–693.Google Scholar
  12. Marshall A [1890] (1920) Principles of Economics. 8th edition, London, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller P (2001) Business Clusters in the UK – A First Assessment. DTI, London. www.dti.gov.uk/clusters/map
  14. Porter M (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Szanyi M (2008) A versenyképesség javítása együttműködéssel: regionális klaszterek. Napvilág Kiadó, Budapest.Google Scholar
  17. UNCTAD (2005) World Investment Report 2005. Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. United Nations, New York - Genf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for World EconomicsHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.International Business School BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations