Tele-glaucoma: Experiences and Perspectives

  • Georg Michelson
  • Rüdiger Bock
  • Simone Wärntges
  • Joachim Hornegger
  • Berthold Lausen
  • Werner Adler


Glaucoma, a group of diseases that lead to optic neuropathy, is one of the most common reasons for blindness worldwide [1]. The most common form among the Caucasian population is open-angle glaucoma (OAG) [2]. Glaucoma can be found especially in the elderly population. The relationship between age and glaucoma prevalence is established, while the influence of gender is disputed. Some studies reported a higher prevalence of OAG in men than in women [3–5], while other studies did not find differences [6–8]. Glaucoma is defined by typical changes in the optic nerve head (ONH) and a visual field loss caused by a degeneration of retinal nerve fibers, loss of retinal ganglion cells and astrocytes [9] (glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy). Cross-sectional screening studies of the optic nerve head were performed, which were accomplished to detect optic nerve head pathologies and retinal microangiopathic abnormalities [10, 11].


Optic Nerve Optic Nerve Head Intraobserver Reliability Fundus Image Exact Logistic Regression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Quigley HA (1996) Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 80:389–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson GJ, Quigley HA (2003) The glaucomas. In: Johnson GJ, Minassian DC, Weale RA, West SK (eds) The epidemiology of eye disease. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 222–239Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolfs RCW, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, Klaver CCW, Hulsmann CAA, Hofmann A et al (2000) Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences – the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(11):3309–3321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rotchford AP, Kirwan JF, Muller MA, Johnson GJ, Roux P (2003) Temba glaucoma study: a population-based cross-sectional survey in urban South Africa. Ophthalmology 110(2):376–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, Thulasiraj RD, Tielsch JM, Katz J et al (2003) Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 110(8):1484–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wensor MD, McCarthy CA, Stanislavsky YL, Livingston PM, Taylor HR (1998) The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology 105(4):733–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA, Nguyen BB, Deneen J, Wilson MR et al (2004) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 111(8):1439–1448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weih LM, Nanjan M, McCarthy CA, Taylor HR (2001) Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 108(11):1966–1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grehn F, Stamper R (eds) (2004) Glaucoma. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michelson G, Striebel W, Prihoda W, Schmidt V (2000) Telemedicine in the control of intra-ocular pressure. J Telemed Telecare 6(Suppl 1):126–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michelson G (2005) TalkingEyes-and-more. Biomed Tech (Berl) 50(7–8):218–226Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonas J (1989) Biomorphometrie des nervus opticus. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R Development Core Team (2006) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox DR (1970) Analysis of binary data. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jonasson F, Damji KF, Arnarsson A, Sverrisson T, Wang L, Sasaki H et al (2003) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Iceland: Reykjavik Eye Study. Eye (Lond) 17(6):747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O’Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S et al (2004) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122(4):532–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J (1991) Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 266(3):369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR (1996) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 103(10):1661–1669PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J et al (1992) Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Study. Ophthalmology 99(10):1499–1504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bock R, Meier J, László GN, Hornegger J, Michelson G (2010) Glaucoma risk index: automated glaucoma detection from color fundus images. Med Image Anal 14:471–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Michelson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rüdiger Bock
    • 4
  • Simone Wärntges
    • 2
  • Joachim Hornegger
    • 3
    • 4
  • Berthold Lausen
    • 5
  • Werner Adler
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Interdisciplinary Center of Ophthalmic Preventive Medicine and Imaging (IZPI)University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  3. 3.School of Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT)University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  4. 4.Chair of Pattern RecognitionUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  5. 5.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of EssexColchesterUK
  6. 6.Department of Biometry and EpidemiologyUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations