Skip to main content

The Partiality in Italian Political Interviews: Stereotype or Reality?

  • Conference paper
  • 2526 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6800))

Abstract

This contribution has two aims closely related. The first one is to assess toughness and partiality of the main Italian political broadcasts analysing interruptions which occur during the interviews. Interruptions can be considered a conversational index according to the theory of equivocation. Results show that more than the half of the studied broadcasts are “tough” and that many public opinion’s beliefs are true with some surprising exceptions. The second aim is to design an interactive multimedia software for coding interruptions from the interruption coding system applied to our sample and from the obtained results. Indications are drawn to implement this software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Law 2000 February 22th, n. 28. Disposizioni per la Parità di Accesso ai Mezzi di Informazione durante le Campagne Elettorali e Referendarie e per la Comunicazione Politica (Regulation for Equal Access to Information Media during Electoral and Referendum Campaigns and for the Political Communication). Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica, 43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gnisci, A.: Coercive and Face-Threatening Questions to Left-Wing and Right-Wing Politicians during Two Italian Broadcasts: Conversational Indexes of Par Conditio for Democracy Systems. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 38, 1179–1210 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Bryson, L., Mullett, J.: Political Equivocation: A Situational Explanation. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 7, 137–145 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewin, K.: The Conceptual Representation and Measurement of Psychological Forces. Contributions to Psychological Theory 1 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bavelas, J.B.: Theoretical and Methodological Principles of the Equivocation Project. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 17, 183–199 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goffman, E.: On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction. Psychiatry 18, 213–231 (1955); Reprinted in Goffman, E.: Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Anchor, Garden City, NY (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bull, P.E.: ”Sipperiness, Evasion, and Ambiguity”: Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 27, 324–332 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bull, P., Elliott, J., Palmer, D., Walker, L.: Why Politicians are Three-Faced: The Face Model of Political Interviews. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 35, 267–284 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M.: Grilling Politicians. Politicians’ Answers to Questions in Television Interviews and Courtroom Examinations. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 22, 385–413 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bull, P.: On Identifying Questions, Replies and Non-Replies in Political Interviews. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 13, 115–131 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bull, P., Elliott, J.: Level of Threat: A Means of Assessing Interviewer Toughness and Neutrality. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 17, 220–244 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bull, P., Mayer, K.: Interruptions in Political Interviews: A Study of Margaret Thatcher and Neil Kinnock. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 7, 35–45 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. West, C., Zimmerman, D.H.: Small Insults: A study of Interruptions in Cross-sex Conversations between Unacquainted Persons. In: Thorne, B., Henley, N. (eds.) Language, Gender, and Society, pp. 118–124. Newbury House, Rowley (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beattie, G.W.: Turn-Taking and Interruptions in Political Interviews- Margaret Thatcher and Jim Callaghan Compared and Contrasted. Semiotica 39, 93–114 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bull, P.: The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Ambiguity. Routledge, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Roger, D.B., Schumacher, A.: Effects of Individual Differences on Dyadic Conversational Strategies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45, 700–705 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bazzanella, C.: Le Interruzioni “Competitive” e “Supportive”: Verso una Configurazione Complessiva. In: Stati, S., Weigand, E., Hundsnurscher, F. (eds.) Dialog-analyse III, Niemeyer, Tubingen, pp. 283–292 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murata, K.: Intrusive or Cooperative? A Cross-cultural Study of Interruption. J. Pragmatics 21, 385–400 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roger, D.B., Bull, P.E., Smith, S.: The Development of a Comprehensive System for Classifying Interruptions. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 7, 27–34 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In: Goody, E. (ed.) Questions of Politeness, pp. 56–310. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gnisci, A., Bull, P., Graziano, E., Ciancia, M.R., Errico, D.: Un Sistema di Codifica delle Interruzioni nell Intervista Politica Italiana. Psicologia Sociale 1, 119–140 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen, J.A.: A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bazzanella, C.: Le Facce del Parlare: Un Approccio Pragmatico all’Italiano Parlato, La Nuova Italia, Firenze (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gnisci, A.: Sequential Strategies of Accomodation: A New Method in Courtroom. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 44, 621–643 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gnisci, A., Bakeman, R.: Sequential Accomodation of Turn Taking and Turn Length: A Study of Courtroom Interaction. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 26, 134–259 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mentana, E.: La Passionaccia. Milano, Rizzoli (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gnisci, A., Di Conza, A., Zollo., P.: Political Journalism as a Democracy Watchman. In: Herrmann, P. (ed.) Democracy in Theory and Action, NOVA Publishers, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gnisci, A., Sergi, I., De Luca, E., Errico, V.: Does Frequency of Interruptions Amplify the effect of Various Types of Interruptions? Experimental Evidence. J. Nonverbal Behav. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Graziano, E., Gnisci, A. (2011). The Partiality in Italian Political Interviews: Stereotype or Reality?. In: Esposito, A., Vinciarelli, A., Vicsi, K., Pelachaud, C., Nijholt, A. (eds) Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and Enactment. The Processing Issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6800. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25774-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25775-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics