Advertisement

Guytonian Approach to the Circulation

  • H. D. Aya
  • A. Rhodes
  • M. Cecconi
Part of the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (AUICEM, volume 2012)

Abstract

The cardiovascular system is highly complex and a good understanding of its physiology and pathophysiology is essential in order to diagnose and treat cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill patients. Much of what we know comes from the experiments and theories of Frank Starling and Guyton [1–4]. In this chapter we will review some of these aspects and present new technology that has the potential to monitor in vivo the Guytonian aspects of the circulation.

Keywords

Venous Return Filling Pressure Fluid Responsiveness Pulse Pressure Variation Stroke Volume Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Patterson SW, Piper H, Starling EH (1914) The regulation of the heart beat. J Physiol 48: 465–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patterson SW, Starling EH (1914) On the mechanical factors which determine the output of the ventricles. J Physiol 48: 357–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guyton AC (1955) Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol Rev 35: 123–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guyton AC, Lindsey AW, Kaufmann BN (1955) Effect of mean circulatory filling pressure and other peripheral circulatory factors on cardiac output. Am J Physiol 180: 463–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ (1981) Does the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predict left ventricular preload in critically ill patients? Crit Care Med 9: 437–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A (1999) Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 25: 843–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jardin F, Valtier B, Beauchet A, Dubourg O, Bourdarias JP (1994) Invasive monitoring combined with two-dimensional echocardiographic study in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 20: 550–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Zeravik J, Pfeiffer UJ (1992) Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 18: 142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoeft A, Schorn B, Weyland A, et al (1994) Bedside assessment of intravascular volume status in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 81: 76–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buhre W, Weyland A, Schorn B, et al (1999) Changes in central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure do not indicate changes in right and left heart volume in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthiol 16: 11–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD (2000) The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 90: 351–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ (1981) The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery 90: 61–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al (2007) Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 35: 64–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al (2004) Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 32: 691–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B (2008) Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 134: 172–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL (2003) Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 124: 1900–1908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Keyl C, Rodig G (2001) Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15: 584–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Moerstedt K, et al (2002) Intrathoracic blood volume index measured by thermodilution for preload monitoring after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16: 191–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Della Rocca G, Costa GM, Coccia C, Pompei L, Di Marco P, Pietropaoli P (2002) Preload index: pulmonary artery occlusion pressure versus intrathoracic blood volume monitoring during lung transplantation. Anesth Analg 95: 835–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thys DM, Hillel Z, Goldman ME, Mindich BP, Kaplan JA (1987) A comparison of hemodynamic indices derived by invasive monitoring and two-dimensional echocardiography. Anesthesiology 67: 630–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2001) Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 119: 867–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, et al (2004) Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30: 1740–1746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A (2009) Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 37: 2642–2647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N (2011) Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anesth 25: 904–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31: 517–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinsky MR (2003) Rationale for cardiovascular monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care 9: 222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guyton AC (1971) Basic Human Physiology: Normal Function and Mechanisms of Disease. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bayliss WM, Starling EH (1894) Observations on venous pressures and their relationship to capillary pressures. J Physiol 16: 159–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Magder S (2006) Point: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct. J Appl Physiol 101: 1523–1525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brengelmann GL (2006) Counterpoint: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is not correct. J Appl Physiol 101: 1525–1526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schipke JD, Heusch G, Sanii AP, Gams E, Winter J (2003) Static filling pressure in patients during induced ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H 2510–2515Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pinsky MR (1984) Instantaneous venous return curves in an intact canine preparation. J Appl Physiol 56: 765–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Versprille A, Jansen JR (1985) Mean systemic filling pressure as a characteristic pressure for venous return. Pflugers Arch 405: 226–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Den Hartog EA, Versprille A, Jansen JR (1994) Systemic filling pressure in intact circulation determined on basis of aortic vs. central venous pressure relationships. Am J Physiol 267: H 2255–2258Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hiesmayr M, Jansen JR, Versprille A (1996) Effects of endotoxin infusion on mean systemic filling pressure and flow resistance to venous return. Pflugers Arch 431: 741–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maas JJ, Geerts BF, van den Berg PC, Pinsky MR, Jansen JR (2009) Assessment of venous return curve and mean systemic filling pressure in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Med 37: 912–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Parkin WG, Wright CA (1991) Three dimensional closed loop control of the human circulation. Int J Clin Monit Comput 8: 35–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Parkin G, Wright C, Bellomo R, Boyce N (1994) Use of a mean systemic filling pressure analogue during the closed-loop control of fluid replacement in continuous hemodiafiltration. J Crit Care 9: 124–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Parkin WG, Leaning MS (2008) Therapeutic control of the circulation. J Clin Monit Comput 22: 391–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A (2011) What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 17: 290–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pellegrino VA, Mudaliar Y, Gopalakrishnan M, et al (2011) Computer based haemodynamic guidance system is effective and safe in management of postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 39: 191–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jansen JR, Maas JJ, Pinsky MR (2010) Bedside assessment of mean systemic filling pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care 16: 231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121: 2000–2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Aya
  • A. Rhodes
  • M. Cecconi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations