Unlock your Hormonal Quotient® (HQ)

  • Diana Derval
  • Johan Bremer
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)


In this chapter, we study the dimensions important to consider when evaluating a career path and how hormones influence each of them. We review main biomarkers like the shape of our face and the digit ratio, and what they reveal about our personality. We also explain how to measure the Hormonal Quotient® (HQ) and share the typical traits for each of the eight Hormonal Quotient® (HQ) profiles.


Opioid Receptor Ring Finger Digit Ratio Face Expression Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Albores-Gallo L, Fernández-Guasti A, Hernández-Guzmán L, List-Hilton C (2009) 2D:4D finger ratio and language development. Rev Neurol 48 (11):577–581 (PubMed PMID:19472155)Google Scholar
  2. Alexander GM (2003) An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: pink, blue, and the brain. Arch Sex Behav 32(1):7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avena NM, Rada P, Hoebel BG (2008) Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(1):20–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. A&E Television Networks (2012) Donald trump biography. Accessed 2012
  5. Bar M (2007) The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends Cogn Sci 11(7):280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beech JR, Mackintosh IC (2005) Do differences in sex hormones affect handwriting style? Evidence from digit ratio and sex role identity as determinants of the sex of handwriting. Pers Individ Differ 39(2):459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beech JR, Beauvois MW (2006) Early experience of sex hormones as a predictor of reading, phonology, and auditory perception. Brain Lang 96(1):49–58 (PubMed PMID:16203032)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benderlioglu Z, Nelson RJ (2004) Digit length ratios predict reactive aggression in women, but not in men. Horm Behav 46(5):558–564 (PubMed PMID:15555497)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blair G (2001) The Trumps: three generations that built an empire. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC (2007) 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Arch Sex Behav 36(3):377–384 (PubMed PMID:17203400)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell BC, Dreber A, Apicella CL, Eisenberg DT, Gray PB, Little AC, Garcia JR, Zamore RS, Lum JK (2010) Testosterone exposure, dopaminergic reward, and sensation-seeking in young men. Physiol Behav 99(4):451–456 (PubMed PMID:20026092)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chahl LA (1996) Opioids—mechanisms of action. Aust Prescr 19:63–65Google Scholar
  13. CNN Political Unit (2011) Trump not running for president. Accessed 2012
  14. De Bruin EI, Verheij F, Wiegman T, Ferdinand RF (2006) Differences in finger length ratio between males with autism, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified, ADHD, and anxiety disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol 48(12):962–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreber A, Apicella CL, Eisenberg DTA, Garcia JR, Zamore RS, Lum JK, Campbell B (2009) The 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) is associated with financial risk taking in men. Evolut Hum Behav 30:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (2012) Foradil Official FDA information, side effects and uses. Accessed 2012
  17. Ebstein RP, Israel S, Lerer E, Uzefovsky F, Shalev I, Gritsenko I, Riebold M, Salomon S, Yirmiya N (2009) Arginine vasopressin and oxytocin modulate human social behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1167:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evardone M, Alexander GM (2009) Anxiety, sex-linked behaviors, and digit ratios (2D:4D). Arch Sex Behav 38(3):442–455 (PubMed PMID:17943431; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2768336)Google Scholar
  19. Ferdenzi C, Lemaître JF, Leongómez JD, Roberts SC (2011) Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts facial, but not voice or body odour, attractiveness in men. Proc Biol Sci (PubMed PMID:21508034)Google Scholar
  20. Fink B, Neave N, Manning JT (2003) Second to fourth digit ratio, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-chest ratio: their relationships in heterosexual men and women. Ann Hum Biol 30(6):728–738 (PubMed PMID:14675912)Google Scholar
  21. Fink B, Manning JT, Neave N, Tan U (2004) Second to fourth digit ratio and hand skill in Austrian children. Biol Psychol 67(3):375–384 (PubMed PMID:15294393)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fink B, Grammer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL, Manning JT (2005) Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proc Biol Sci 272(1576):1995–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heimberg RG, Horner KJ, Juster HR, Safren SA, Brown EJ, Schneier FR, Liebowitz MR (1999) Psychometric properties of the liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychol Med 29(1):199–212 (PubMed PMID:10077308)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heimovics SA, Cornil CA, Ball GF, Riters LV (2009) D1-like dopamine receptor density in nuclei involved in social behavior correlates with song in a context-dependent fashion in male European starlings. Neuroscience 159(3):962–973 (Epub 2009 Jan 27)Google Scholar
  25. Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1995) Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. The MIT Press, Boston Google Scholar
  26. Houpt KA (2007) Genetics of canine behavior. Acta Vet. Brno 76:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchison C (2011) Left-handed legacy: demystifying the southpaw. ABC News Medical Unit: Accessed 2012
  28. Jamison CS, Meier RJ, Campbell BC (1993) Dermatoglyphic asymmetry and testosterone levels in normal males. Am J Phys Anthropol 90(2):185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kudo H, Dunbar RIM (2001) Neocortex size and social network size in humans. Anim Behav 62:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning JT, Barley L, Walton J, Lewis-Jones DI, Trivers RL, Singhe D, Thornhill R, Rohdeg P, Bereczkeih T, Henzii P (2000) The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolut Hum Behav 21:163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manning JT (2002) Digit Ratio: a pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. Rutgers University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Manzano Ö, Cervenka S, Karabanov A, Farde L, Ullén F (2010) Thinking outside a less intact box: thalamic dopamine D2 receptor densities Are negatively related to psychometric creativity in healthy individuals. PLoS ONE 5(5):e10670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinez D, Orlowska D, Narendran R, Slifstein M, Liu F, Kumar D, Broft A, Van Heertum R, Kleber HD (2010) Dopamine type 2/3 receptor availability in the striatum and social status in human volunteers. biological psychiatr 67(3):275–278Google Scholar
  34. Matthews LJ, Butler PM (2011) Novelty-seeking DRD4 polymorphisms are associated with human migration distance out-of-Africa after controlling for neutral population gene structure. Am J Phys Anthropol 145(3):382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mehta PH, Josephs RA (2010) Social endocrinology. In: Dunning D (ed) Social motiva-tion. Psychology Press, New York, pp 171–189Google Scholar
  36. Millet K, Dewitte S (2006) Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior. Biol Psychol 71(1):111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mills PJ, Dimsdale JE, Ziegler MG, Nelesen RA (1995) Racial differences in epinephrine and ß2-adrenergic receptors. Hypertension 25:88–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neave N, Laing S, Fink B, Manning JT (2003) Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Proc Biol Sci 270(1529):2167–2172 ( PubMed PMID:14561281; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1691489)Google Scholar
  39. NIH (2012) Vasoconstriction. Medlineplus: Accessed 2012
  40. O’Brien TL (2012) What’s he really Worth? The New York Times. Accessed 2012
  41. Olmstead MC, Ouagazzal AM, Kieffer BL (2009) Mu and delta opioid receptors oppositely regulate motor impulsivity in the signaled nose poke task. PLoS ONE 4(2):e4410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palmeira CCA, Ashmawi HA, Posso IP (2011) Sex and pain perception and analgesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol 61(6):814−828Google Scholar
  43. Riters LV (2010) Evidence for opioid involvement in the motivation to sing. J Chem Neuroanat 39(2):141–150 (Epub 2009 Apr 5)Google Scholar
  44. Roberti JW (2004) A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. J Res Pers 38(3):256–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russo-Neustadt A, Cotman CW (1997) Adrenergic receptors in alzheimer’s disease brain: selective increases in the cerebella of aggressive patients. J Neurosci 17(14):5573–5580Google Scholar
  46. Schaefer K, Fink B, Mitteroecker P, Neave N, Bookstein FL (2005) Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone. Coll Antropol 29(2):415–419Google Scholar
  47. Schneier FR, Liebowitz MR, Abi-Dargham A, Zea-Ponce Y, Lin SH, Laruelle M (2000) Low dopamine D2 receptor binding potential in social phobia. Am J Psychiatry 157:457–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skyscraper Source Media (2012) Accessed 2012
  49. Stoyanov Z, Marinov M, Pashalieva I (2009) Finger length ratio (2D:4D) in left- and right-handed males. Int J Neurosci 119(7):1006–1013 (PubMed PMID:19466635)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Time Inc (2012) The secret to Donald Trump’s hair.,31813,2065167,00.html. Accessed 2012
  51. Trump DJ (2012) Donald Trump biography. Accessed 2012
  52. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28(4):575–589 discussion 589–633Google Scholar
  53. Weizmann Institute of Science (2012) HTR1B Gene. GeneCards: Accessed 2012
  54. Wikimedia Foundation (2012) Fundraising 2011. Meta-Wiki:, Accessed 2012
  55. Williams JH, Greenhalgh KD, Manning JT (2003) Second to fourth finger ratio and possible precursors of developmental psychopathology in preschool children. Early Hum Dev 72(1):57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zheng Z, Cohn MJ (2011) Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. PNAS 108(39):16289–16294Google Scholar
  57. Zuckerman M (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Derval
    • 1
  • Johan Bremer
    • 2
  1. 1.DervalResearchChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Bremer StudiosAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations