Uses of Peer Assessment in Database Teaching and Learning
This discussion paper introduces three very different methods and contexts for the use of peer assessment in introductory database classes, each of which is supported by different learning software tools. In the first case study, at Glasgow Caledonian University, Contributing Student Pedagogy is used, where students contribute to the learning of others through the collaborative creation of a bank of self-assessment questions. This is supported by the Peerwise software tool. Secondly, at the University of Strathclyde, students undertake formative assessment of others in providing feedback on an initial element of a larger coursework assessment. A number of virtual learning environments (VLEs) are capable of supporting this method through customisable discussion fora. Finally, at the University of Abertay Dundee, peer and self assessment are used in a group project to adjust the group grade for individual students. This is effected through the use of the WebPA software tool.
KeywordsGroup Project Bulletin Board Group Grade Virtual Learning Environment Peer Assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Cogdell, B., Brown, A., Campbell, A.: Peer-assessment of group work in a large class - development of a staff and student friendly system (2004), ftp://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/TeachingGuides/fulltext.pdf
- 3.Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Purchase, H.: PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions. In: Proc. 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, pp. 51–58 (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., Hamer, J.: The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In: Proc. 10th Conference on Australasian Computing Education, pp. 69–74 (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., Hamer, J., Purchase, H.: Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository. In: Proc. 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 11–15 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., Simon, B.: Quality of student contributed questions using PeerWise. In: Proc. 11th Australasian Computing Education Conference, pp. 45–53 (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Hamer, J.: Some experiences with the contributing student approach. In: Proc. 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 68–72 (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Kennedy, G.J.: Peer-assessment in group projects: is it worth it? In: Proc. 7th Australasian Computing Education Conference, pp. 59–65 (2005)Google Scholar
- 12.Schulte, C., Bennedsen, J.: What do teachers teach in introductory programming? In: Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Computing Education Research, pp. 17–28 (2006)Google Scholar
- 14.Tenant, J., Crawford, A., Wilkinson, N.: Supplementary information about self and peer assessment, http://staffcentral.bton.ac.uk/
- 15.Loughborough University. WebPA, http://www.webpaproject.com/