Skip to main content

Surrogate-Based Multi-objective Aerothermodynamic Design Optimization of Hypersonic Spiked Bodies

  • Conference paper
28th International Symposium on Shock Waves

Introduction

Among various design requirements, reducing both drag and aerodynamic heating is the most crucial in the design of hypersonic vehicles. Pointed slender bodies generate lower drag compared with blunt bodies at hypersonic conditions. Hence, they provide a good choice as far as drag reduction is concerned. On the other hand, blunt bodies were found to yield lower heating levels compared with their pointed counterparts [1]. In fact, hypersonic vehicles such as missiles, interplanetary space missions, space planes, and launch missiles usually have blunt shapes [1],[2]. Obviously, designing a vehicle that simultaneously satisfies both minimum drag and aerodynamic heating is not straightforward and there is a challenging trade-off between these two vital requirements. However, it is believed that these two requirements can be met by altering the flowfield pattern around the blunt body so as to eliminate the strong detached bow shock wave. A variety of techniques have been implemented in this regard [1] but the use of spikes proved to be the simplest and the most effective technique in reducing both drag and aerodynamic heating [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Menezes, V., Saravanan, S., Jagadeesh, G., Reddy, K.P.J.: Experimental Investigations of Hypersonic Flow over Highly Blunted Cones with Aerospikes. AIAA Journal 41(10), 1955–1966 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta, R.C.: Flow Field Computations Over Conical, Disc and Flat Spiked Body at Mach 6. AIAA Paper, 2009-325 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gauer, M., Paull, A.: Numerical Investigation of a Spiked Blunt Nose Cone at Hypersonic Speeds. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 45(3), 459–471 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford, D.H.: Investigation of The Flow over a Spiked-Nose Hemisphere-Cylinder. NASA TN-D-118 (December 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gnemmi, P., Srulijes, J., Roussel, K.: Flowfield around Spike-Tipped Bodies for High Attack Angles at Mach 4.5. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 40(5), 622–631 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holden, M.: Experimental Studies of Separated Flows at Hypersonic Speeds. Part I-Separated Flows over Axisymmetric Spiked Bodies. AIAA Journal 4(4), 591–599 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Motoyama, N., Mihara, K., Miyajima, R., Watanuki, T., Kubota, H.: Thermal Protection and Drag Reduction with Use of Spike in Hypersonic Flow. AIAA paper 2001-1828 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morris, M.D., Mitchell, T.J.: Exploratory Designs for Computational Experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 43, 381–402 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J., Wynn, H.P.: Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science 4(4), 409–423 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Viana, F.A.C.: SURROGATES Toolbox (December 2009), http://fchegury.googlepages.com

  11. Fluent 6.3 User Guide, Fluent Inc., Lebanon, NH 03766, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gambit 2.4 User Guide, Fluent Inc., Lebanon, NH 03766, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kalimuthu, R., Mehta, R.C., Rathakrishnan, E.: Experimental Investigation on Spiked Body in Hypersonic Flow. The Aeronautical Journal 112(1136), 593–598 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. NSGA-II toolbox for Matlab user guide, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/10429-nsga-ii-a-multi-objective-optimization-algorithm (cited January 2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ahmed, M.Y.M., Qin, N. (2012). Surrogate-Based Multi-objective Aerothermodynamic Design Optimization of Hypersonic Spiked Bodies. In: Kontis, K. (eds) 28th International Symposium on Shock Waves. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25688-2_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25688-2_110

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25687-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25688-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics