Numerical Investigations on Muzzle Flow under Approaching Real Shooting Conditions

  • X. Jiang
  • H. Li
  • Z. Guo
  • Y. Wang
  • Z. Chen
Conference paper

Introduction

Complicated physical phenomena accompanied by muzzle flow were investigated to suppress or reduce their side-effect for many years [1][2], such as shock/blast interactions, muzzle flash and noise etc. It is important to study their mechanism for improving or increasing the weapon efficiency. More experimental investigations about them were performed, but still relative less numerical ones. With the great advancement of the computer technology and computational fluid dynamic, numerical simulation has become one of the methods to reveal the physical and chemical phenomena of muzzle flow field as well as experiment now.

Keywords

Shock Wave Interior Ballistic Leading Shock Precursor Shock Muzzle Blast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Klingenberg, G., Heimerl, J.M.: Gun Muzzle Bast and Flash. AIAA, Reston (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt, E., Shear Schmidt, D.: Optical Measurements of Muzzle Blast. AIAA Journal 13(8), 1086–1091 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang, Z.L.: Wave dynamic processed induced by a supersonic projectile discharging from a shock tube. Physics of Fluids 15(6), 1665–1675 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang, X.H., Chen, Z.H., Fan, B.C., Li, H.Z.: Numerical simulation of blast flow fields induced by a high-speed projectile. Shock Waves 18, 205–212 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cler, D.L., Chevaugeon, N., Shephard, M.S., Remacle, J.F.: CFD Application to Gun Muzzle Bast-A Validation Case Study. AIAA Paper 2003-1142 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Florio, L.A.: Effect of vent opening area and arrangement on gas flow field as gas propelled cylinder exits a flow tube. Meccanica (2009), doi: 10.1007/s11012-009-9266-3Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cayzac, R., Carette, E., Alziary de Roquefort, T.: 3D unsteady intermediate ballistics modeling: muzzle brake and sabot separation. In: 24th International Symposium of Ballistics (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cayzac, R., Carette, E., Alziary de Roquefort, T.: Advanced 120mm lightweight tank demonstrator:Direct modelling of the interior, intermediate and exterior ballistics as well as the weapon system environment. In: 25th International Symposium on Ballistics (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang, X.H., Chen, Z.H., Li, H.Z.: Numerical investigation on the reacting muzzle flow. In: 27th International Symposium on Shock Waves (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dai, S.-L., Xu, H.-Q., Xiao, Z.-L.: Parallel computation of muzzle secondary combustion including movavble high-speed projectile. In: 25th International Symposium on Ballistics (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blazek, J.: Computational fluid dynamics: principles and applications. Elsevier press, UK (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Golovitchev, V.I., Chomiak, J.: Evaluation of Ignition Improvers for Methane Autoignition. Comb. Sci. and Tech. 135, 31–47 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haidn, O.J., et al.: CFD Analysis of a Model Combustor Ignition and Comparison with Experimental Results. AIAA 2007-5441 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weng, C.S., Wang, H.: Computational interior ballistics. Chinese national defense industry press, Beijing (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. Jiang
    • 1
  • H. Li
    • 1
  • Z. Guo
    • 1
  • Y. Wang
    • 1
  • Z. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Sci. & Tec. on Transient Physics LaboratoryNanjing University of Sci. & Tec.NanjingChina

Personalised recommendations