Advertisement

On the Validation of a Hypersonic Flow Solver Using Measurements of Shock Detachment Distance

  • Rowan J. Gollan
  • Peter A. Jacobs
Conference paper

Introduction

When using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes for computing quantities for engineering purposes, it is important to have confidence in the accuracy and quality of the code. Hence, it has become important to verify and validate CFD codes. Verification refers to ensuring that the numerics of the flow solver are correctly solving the chosen set of governing equations. Validation, on the other hand, is used to check that the governing equations and associated models are appropriate to capture the physics of interest in the flow. In this paper, we undertake a validation exercies for a hypersonic flow solver for chemically reacting flows by comparing computations of shock detachment distance on spheres to experimental measurements. The particular flow solver validated is Eilmer, which has been developed (and continues to be developed) by researchers at the Centre for Hypersonics at The University of Queensland.

Keywords

Computational Fluid Dynamic Hypersonic Flow Thermal Nonequilibrium Couple Ordinary Differential Equation Chemical Nonequilibrium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lobb, R.K.: Experimental measurement of shock detachment distance on spheres fired in air at hypervelocities. In: The High Temperature Aspects of Hypersonic Flow, pp. 519–527. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1964)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Candler, G.V.: On the computation of shock shapes in nonequilibrium hypersonic flows. AIAA Paper 89-0312 (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gnoffo, P.A.: Code calibration program in support of the aeroassist flight experiment. Journal of Spacecraft 27(2), 131–142 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nonaka, S., Mizuno, H., Takayama, K., Park, C.: Measurement of shock standoff distance for sphere in ballistic range. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 14(2), 225–229 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobs, P.A., Gollan, R.J., Denman, A.W., O’Flaherty, B.T., Potter, D.F., Petrie-Repar, P.J., Johnston, I.A.: Eilmer’s theory book: Basic models for gas dynamics and thermochemistry. Mechanical Engineering Report 2010/09, The University of Queensland (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oran, E.S., Boris, J.P.: Numerical Simulation of Reactive Flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macrossan, M.N.: The equilibrium flux method for the calculation of flows with non-equilibrium chemical reactions. Journal of Computational Physics 80, 204–231 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wada, Y., Liou, M.-S.: An accurate and robust flux splitting scheme for shock and contact discontinuities. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 18(3), 633–657 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mott, D.R.: New Quasi-Steady-State and Partial-Equilibrium Methods for Integrating Chemically Reacting Systems. PhD thesis, University of Michigan (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gollan, R.J.: The Computational Modelling of High-Temperature Gas Effects with Application to Hypersonic Flows. PhD thesis, School of Engineering, The University of Queensland (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Billig, F.S.: Shock-wave shapes around spherical- and cylindrical-nosed bodies. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 4(6), 822–823 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta, R.N., Yos, J.M., Thompson, R.A., Lee, K.-P.: A review of reaction rates and thermodynamic and transport properties for an 11-species air model for chemical and thermal nonequilibrium calculations to 30000 k. Reference Publication 1232, NASA (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McBride, B.J., Gordon, S.: Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. Part 2: User’s manual and program description. Reference Publication 1311, NASA (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rowan J. Gollan
    • 1
  • Peter A. Jacobs
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations