Experimental Shock-Initiated Combustion of a Spherical Density Inhomogeneity
A planar shock wave that impulsively accelerates a spherical density inhomogeneity baroclinically deposits vorticity and enhances the mixing between the two fluids resulting in a complex, turbulent flow field. This is known as the classical shockbubble interaction (SBI) and has been a topic of study for several decades [1,2,3,4, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], and closely related the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability (RMI) [13, 14]. While the classical SBI problem concerns a reactively neutral bubble, the present experimental study is the first of its kind in which a spherical bubble filled with a stoichiometric mixture of H2 and O2 diluted with Xe is accelerated by a planar shock wave (1.35 < M < 2.85) in ambient N2, and will be referred to as reactive shock-bubble interaction (RSBI).
KeywordsShock Wave Mach Number Vortex Ring Shock Tube Induction Time
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Haehn, N., Ranjan, D., Weber, C., Oakley, J., Anderson, M., Bonazza, R.: Experimental investigation of a twice-shocked spherical density inhomogeneity. Physica Scripta T142 (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Haehn, N., Weber, C., Oakley, J., Anderson, M., Ranjan, D., Bonazza, R.: Experimental investigation of a twice-shocked spherical gas inhomogeneity with particle image velocimetry. Shock Waves, 1–7 (2011)Google Scholar
- 13.Richtmyer, R.D.: Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 12, 1–3 (1984)Google Scholar
- 14.Meshkov, E.E.: Instability of a shock wave accelerated interface between two gases. NASA Technical Translation 13, 1–14 (1970)Google Scholar
- 17.Liu, J., Liou, J., Sichel, M., Kauffman, C.: Diffraction and transmission of a detonation into a bounding explosive layer. In: Twenty-first Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 1639–1647 (1986)Google Scholar
- 21.Tonello, N.A., Sichel, M., Oran, E.S.: Numerical simulations of the diffraction of planar detonations in H2-O2 mixtures. In: Symposium (International) on Combustion, vol. 26(2), pp. 3033–3039 (1996)Google Scholar