Prediction of Transition Location and Its Effects on Shock Bump Control on a Natural Laminar Flow Aerofoil

  • F. Deng
  • S. C. McIntosh
  • N. Qin
Conference paper

Introduction

The reduction of overall drag for an aircraft operating at its cruise condition is a prevalent goal for many involved in the aerodynamic design of transonic aircraft. Bringing both financial and environmental benefits, savings on the order of single drag counts are considered to be significant. Many concepts have been trailed in the pursuit of increased lift to drag ratios at transonic cruise. One of them, in terms of novel concepts addressing this issue, is the preservation of natural laminar flow over an increased proportion of the wing area. The laminarisation of a wing reduces overall drag via both a reduction in skin friction drag resulting from decreased mixing across the boundary layer and a reduction in pressure drag resulting from variations in effective aerofoil shape due to reductions in the boundary layer’s displacement thickness. Another concept which reduces the wave drag via the reduction of the strength of the near normal shock-waves on the wing upper surface is the application of 2D shock control bumps to the laminar or turbulent wings by Ashill et al. [1, 2]. Since Qin et al. [3] proposed 3D bumps for shock control, detailed experimental and numerical studies, including bump shape optimisation have been conducted by Wong et al. [4], Ogawa et al. [5] and Qin et al. [6]. While the λ–shock structure is observed as the key feature for some bump geometries tested [4, 5], e.g. ramp bumps, the optimised 2D and 3D bumps show a “knee-shaped” shock structure for smoothly (continuity of the first derivative) contoured bump designs [6].

Keywords

Shock Structure Wave Drag Pressure Drag Transition Onset Laminar Separation Bubble 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashill, P.R., Fulker, J.L., Shires, A.: A novel technique for controlling shock strength of laminar flow aerofoil sections. In: The First European Symposium on Laminar Flow, Hamburg (March 1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fulker, J.L., Ashill, P.R., Simmons, M.J.: Study of simulated active control of shock waves on an aerofoil. Defence Research Agency. Technical Report TR93025 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qin, N., Monet, D., Shaw, S.T.: 3D Bumps for Transonic Wing Shock Control and Drag Reduction. In: CEAS Aerospace Aerodynamics Research Conference, Cambridge, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wong, W.S., Qin, N., Sellars, N., Holden, H., Babinsky, H.: A combined experimental and numerical study of flow structures over three-dimensional shock control bumps. Aerospace Science and Technology 12, 436–447 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogawa, H., Babinsky, H., Pätzold, M., Lutz, T.: Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using Three-Dimensional Bumps for Transonic Wings. AIAA J. 46(6), 1442–1452 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qin, N., Wong, W.S., LeMoigne, A.: Three-dimensional contour bumps for transonic wing drag reduction. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J 222(G5), 605–617 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johanseen, J.: Prediction of Laminar/Turbulent Transition in Airfoil Flows, Risø-R-987(EN), Roskilde, Denmark (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J.: Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions. Journal of Global Optimization 13 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, J., Jameson, A.: Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil and Wing Design by Adjoint Method and Automatic Transition Prediction. In: AIAA 2009-897, Florida (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Deng
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. C. McIntosh
    • 1
  • N. Qin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.College of Aerospace EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsChina

Personalised recommendations