Asymmetric Flow Separation in de Laval Nozzle

  • V. V. Golub
  • S. V. Efremov
  • A. S. Saveliev
Conference paper

Introduction

Operation conditions of rocket engines at sea-level and at high altitudes are different. The considerable difference in value of pressure of ambient air leads to different regimes of outflow from the nozzle - from the overexpanded regime at ground level to the underexpanded at high altitude. Different regimes of outflow from the nozzle cause considerable changes in flow pattern behind the nozzle outlet cross-section. One of the problems is the presence of shock structure in outgoing jet that causes flow separation from the wall of nozzle. It is known that separation point has no stable position on the nozzle surface, but fluctuates during the time. Boundary layer separation leads to the development of an asymmetric developed unsteady flow separation, and hence to unstable in time side-loads on the nozzle. Although modern rocket nozzles have a high longitudinal strength, they are not designed for side loads of high magnitude. The problem of high side loads was encountered in engine testing Vulcan rocket Ariane-5 [1, 2, 3]. Studies have shown that at the expiration of overexpanded regime two patterns of the jet of a nozzle implement, so-called free (Free Shock Separation, FSS) and restricted (Restricted Shock Separation, RSS) separation, with the side loads appearing in both cases [4].

Keywords

Particle Image Velocimetry Pressure Ratio Rocket Engine Laval Nozzle Side Load 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frey, M., Hagemann, G.: Status of flow separation prediction in rocket nozzles. AIAA Paper 98-3619 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frey, M., Hagemann, G.: Flow separation and side loads in rocket nozzles. AIAA Paper 99-2815 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagemann, G., Frey, M., Koschel, W.: Appearance of restricted shock separation in rocket nozzles. J. Propulsion and Power 18(3), 577–584 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frey, M., et al.: European cooperation on flow separation control. In: Proc. of 4th International Conference on Launcher Technology ”Space Launcher Liquid Propulsion”, pp. 1–10 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Summerfield, M., Foster, C., Swan, W.: Flow separation in over-expanded supersonic exhaust nozzles. Jet Propulsion 24(5) (1954)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lawrence, R.A.: Symmetrical and unsymmetrical flow separation in supersonic nozzles. Ph.D. Thesis, Southern Methodist University (1967)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raffel, M., Willert, C.E., Wereley, S.T., Kompenhans, J.: Particle Image Velocimetry. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vasiliev, L.A.: Schlieren methods. Nauka, Moscow (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Golub
    • 1
  • S. V. Efremov
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. S. Saveliev
    • 2
  1. 1.Joint Institute for High Temperatures RASMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyMoscow reg.Russia

Personalised recommendations