Development of Service Performance Indicators for Operations Management in Airline

  • Toru Gengo
  • Kazuo Furuta
  • Taro Kanno
  • Katsuya Fukumoto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6797)


Reliable and efficient operations are essential for successful service business, and Performance Indicators (PIs) are useful tools for assessing appropriateness of service operations and providing cues to remedy flawed performance. Performance indicators should be based on objective data on operation performance, derivable by concrete and simple calculation rules, and exhaustively related to business goals. Development of such PIs is not an easy task, and this work tries to propose a framework for developing PIs using an application example of operations management in an airline. The proposed scheme of development is so general that it is applicable also to services other than airline business.


performance measurement performance indicators airline business flight operations management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Neely, A., Gregory, M., Platts, K.: Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Operations & Production Management 25(12), 1228–1263 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neely, A.: Business Performance Measurement: Unifying Theory and Integrating Practice, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge (2007) (japanese translation)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Pr., Boston (1996) (japanese translation) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Air Transport Association,
  5. 5.
    Kawakita, J.: Method of Idea Generation - For Creativity Development. Chuo Koron Pr. (1967) (japanese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scupin, R.: The KJ Method: A Technique for Analyzing Data Derived from Japanese Ethnology. Human Organization 56(2), 233–237 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watson, R.H.: Interpretive Structural Modeling - A Useful Tool for Technology Assessment? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 11(2), 165–185 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shostack, L.G.: How to Design a Service. Eur. J. Marketing 16(1), 49–63 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shostack, L.G.: Design Services that Deliver. Harvard Business Review 84115, 133–139 (1984)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollnagel, E.: Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control. Academic Pr., New York (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffman, R., Militello, L.: Perspective on Cognitive Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akao, Y.: Introduction to Quality Deployment. Nikka Giren Pr. (1993) (japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toru Gengo
    • 1
  • Kazuo Furuta
    • 1
  • Taro Kanno
    • 1
  • Katsuya Fukumoto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Systems InnovationThe University of TokyBunkyo-kuJapan
  2. 2.All Nippon Airways, Co. Ltd.Ota-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations