Improving Mediation Processes with Avoiding Parties

  • Davide Carneiro
  • Paulo Novais
  • Francisco Andrade
  • José Neves
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6797)


With the advent of the telecommunication technologies, a new form of disputes taking place in virtual environments started to emerge. In order to settle these disputes, Online Dispute Resolution tools appeared. In this paper we present such a tool, aimed at supporting mediation between two or more parties. Specifically, this tool looks at past known mediation processes and tries to guide the process into a successful outcome. Moreover, this tool places an emphasis on providing useful information for the parties before the resolution process actually starting, helping them take more rational decisions. Specifically, in this work we target scenarios in which one or more party exhibits avoiding or uncooperative conflict styles, i.e., the party cannot or is not willing to generate valid proposals for dispute resolution.


Case-based Reasoning Multi-agent Systems Online Dispute Resolution Mediation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brown, H., Marriott, A.: ADR Principles and Practice. Sweet and Maxwell (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, S.C.: Arbitration: essential concepts. ALM Publishing (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katsch, E., Rifkin, J.: Online dispute resolution – resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass Wiley Company, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peruginelli, G.: Artificial Intelligence in Alternative Dispute Resolution. In: Sartor, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop on the Law of Electronic Agents (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lodder, A., Thiessen, E.: The role of artificial intelligence in online dispute resolution. In: Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution at the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Edinburgh, UK (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas, K., Kilmann, R.: Conflict and Conflict Management (1974), (accessed in: July 2010)
  8. 8.
    Andrade, F., Novais, P., Carneiro, D., Zeleznikow, J., Neves, J.: Using BATNAs and WATNAs in Online Dispute Resolution. In: Nakakoji, K., Murakami, Y., McCready, E. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6284, pp. 5–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) ISBN 978-3-642-14887-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: Developing Multi-agent Systems with JADE. In: Intelligent Agents VII Agent Theories Architectures and Languages, pp. 42–47 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Notini, J.: Effective Alternatives Analysis In Mediation: “BATNA/WATNA” Analysis Demystified, (accessed in February 2011)
  11. 11.
    De Vries, B.R., Leenes, R., Zeleznikow, J.: Fundamentals of providing negotiation support online: the need for developing BATNAs. In: Proceedings of the Second International ODR Workshop, pp. 59–67. Wolf Legal Publishers, Tilburg (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guasco, M.P., Robinson, P.R.: Principles of negotiation. Entrepreneur Press (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Andrade, F., Zeleznikow, J., Neves, J.: The Legal Precedent in Online Dispute Resolution. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, ed. Guido Governatori (proceedings of the Jurix 2009 - the 22nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems), pp. 47–52. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009) ISBN 978-1-60750-082-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Carneiro
    • 1
  • Paulo Novais
    • 1
  • Francisco Andrade
    • 2
  • José Neves
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Law SchoolUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations