Rigidity and Convexity of Hypersurfaces in Spheres

  • M. P. do Carmo
  • F. W. Warner


We shall consider isometric immersions \(x:{\text M}^{n}\rightarrow\,\,{\text X}^{n+1}\) of a compact, connected, orientable, n-dimensional \((n\geq 2),{\text C}^\infty\) Riemannian manifold \({\text M}^{n}\) in a simply connected Riemannian manifold \({\text X}^{n+1}\) of constant sectional curvature.


Riemannian Manifold Convex Body Sectional Curvature Fundamental Form Hyperbolic Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A. D. Alexandroff, Die innere Geometrie der konvexen Flächen, Moscow, 1948, in Russian. German translation, Akademie, Berlin, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. Amaral, Thesis at the University of California, Berkeley, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. Bianchi, Vorlesungen über Differentialgeometrie, German translation by M. Lukat, Leipzig, 1899.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Bishop & R. Crittenden, Geometry of manifolds, Academic Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. S. Chern, Curves and surfaces in euclidean space, Studies in Global Geometry and Analysis, Math. Assoc. Amer., 1967, 16–56.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. S. Chern & R. K. Lashof, On the total curvature of immersed manifolds. II, Mich. Math. J. 5 (1958) 5–12.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. P. do Carmo & E. Lima, Isometric immersions with semi-definite second quadratic forms, to appear in Archiv der Mathematik.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Hadamard, Sur certaines propriétés des trajectories en dynamique, J. Math. Pures Appl. 3 (1897) 331–387.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Lelong-Ferrand, Géométrie différentielle, Masson, Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    B. O’Neill, Isometric immersions which preserve curvature operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (1962) 759–763.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. V. Pogorelov, On the rigidity of general closed surfaces, Kiev, 1952, in Russian. German translation, Akademie, Berlin, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. V. Pogorelov, Einige Untersuchungen zur Riemannschen Geometrie im Crossen, Kharkov University Press, 1957, in Russian. German translation, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. V. Pogorelov, Topics in the theory of surfaces in elliptic space, Kharkov University Press, 1960, in Russian. English translation, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Sacksteder, On hypersurfaces with no negative sectional curvatures, Amer. J. Math. 82 (1960) 609–630.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Sacksteder, The rigidity of hypersurfaces, J. Math. Mech. 11 (1962) 929–940.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. van Heijenoort, On locally convex manifolds, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 5 (1952) 845–852.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. Voss, Differentialgeometrie geschlossener Flächen in Euklidischen Raton. 1, Jber. Deutsch. Math. Verein. 63 (1960) 117–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. do Carmo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • F. W. Warner
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.University Of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.I.M.P.A.Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.University Of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations