Genetic Diversity and Effective Crossover in Evolutionary Many-objective Optimization

  • Hiroyuki Sato
  • Hernán E. Aguirre
  • Kiyoshi Tanaka
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6683)

Abstract

In this work, we analyze genetic diversity of Pareto optimal solutions (POS) and study effective crossover operators in evolutionary many-objective optimization. First we examine the diversity of genes in the true POS on many-objective 0/1 knapsack problems with up to 20 items (bits), showing that genes in POS become noticeably diverse as we increase the number of objectives. We also verify the effectiveness of conventional two-point crossover, Local Recombination that selects mating parents based on proximity in objective space, and two-point and uniform crossover operators Controlling the maximum number of Crossed Genes (CCG). We use NSGA-II, SPEA2, IBEA ε +  and MSOPS, which adopt different selection methods, and many-objective 0/1 knapsack problems with n = {100,250,500,750,1000} items (bits) and m = {2,4,6,8,10} objectives to verify the search performance of each crossover operator. Simulation results reveal that Local Recombination and CCG operators significantly improve search performance especially for NSGA-II and MSOPS, which have high diversity of genes in the population. Also, results show that CCG operators achieve higher search performance than Local Recombination for m ≥ 4 objectives and that their effectiveness becomes larger as the number of objectives m increases.

Keywords

Multiobjective Optimization Knapsack Problem Pareto Optimal Solution Objective Space Search Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes, E.J.: Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimisation: Many Once or One Many? In: Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), pp. 222–227 (September 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Working Principles, Behavior, and Performance of MOEAs on MNK-Landscapes. European Journal of Operational Research 181(3), 1670–1690 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II, KanGAL report 200001 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. TIK-Report (103) (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. In: Proc. of 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2008), pp. 2424–2431 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagner, T., Beume, N., Naujoks, B.: Pareto-, Aggregation-, and Indicator-Based Methods in Many-Objective Optimization. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 742–756. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sato, H., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Local Dominance and Local Recombination in MOEAs on 0/1 Multiobjective Knapsack Problems. European Jour. on Operational Research 181(3), 1670–1690 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zitzler, E., Künzli, S.: Indicator-Based Selection in Multiobjective Search. In: Yao, X., Burke, E.K., Lozano, J.A., Smith, J., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Bullinaria, J.A., Rowe, J.E., Tiňo, P., Kabán, A., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 832–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1498, pp. 292–304. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watanabe, S., Hiroyasu, T., Miki, M.: Neighborhood Cultivation Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems. In: Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pp. 458–465 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishibuchi, H., Shibata, Y.: Mating Scheme for Controlling the Diversity-Convergence Balance for Multiobjective Optimization. In: Deb, K., et al. (eds.) GECCO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3102, pp. 1259–1271. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: A Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 11(6), 712–731 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Syswerda, G.: Uniform Crossover in Genetic Algorithms. In: Proc. of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA 1989), pp. 2–9 (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spears, W., De Jong, K.A.: An analysis of multi-point crossover. In: Proc. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sato, H., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Pareto Partial Dominance MOEA and Hybrid Archiving Strategy Included CDAS in Many-Objective Optimization. In: Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2010), pp. 3720–3727 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zitzler, E.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications, PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fonseca, C., Paquete, L., López-Ibáñez, M.: An Improved Dimension-sweep Algorithm for the Hypervolume Indicator. In: Proc. 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1157–1163 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sato, M., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Effects of δ-Similar Elimination and Controlled Elitism in the NSGA-II Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2006), pp. 3980–3398 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroyuki Sato
    • 1
  • Hernán E. Aguirre
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kiyoshi Tanaka
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and EngineeringThe University of Electro-CommunicationsChofuJapan
  2. 2.International Young Researcher Empowerment CenterShinshu UniversityNaganoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringShinshu UniversityNaganoJapan

Personalised recommendations