Advertisement

Fennoscandian Land Uplift: Past, Present and Future

  • Juhani Kakkuri
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences book series (LNESS, volume 137)

Abstract

Many a renowned Nordic scientist has studied the Fennoscandian land uplift phenomenon intensively during the last past centuries, among them the Swede Gerard de Geer, who in the end of the nineteenth century proved that it is a residual rebound phenomenon from Ice Age, and the Finnish geologist Wilhelm Ramsay, who separated the concepts of isostatic land uplift and eustatic sea level rise. According to studies performed, numerous geophysical factors influence on the height of sea level as well as on the velocity of land uplift. Eustatic rise is the most important of them. The other factors are isostatic change in the Earth’s crust, changes in the gravity field due to the melt of continental glaciers, thermal expansion of sea water, slow changes in the volume of sea basin, and the influence of weather conditions.

Keywords

Gravity Field Bouguer Anomaly Gravimetric Geoid Land Uplift Height System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alalammi P (1992) Geophysics of the solid Earth crust. Atlas of Finland Karttakeskus, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomqvist E, Renqvist H (1912) Das Präcisionsnivellement Finlands 1892–1910. Fennia 31, No. 2Google Scholar
  3. Daly RA (1925) Pleistocene changes of level. Am J Sci (5th Series) 10:281–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donner J (1995) The Quaternary history of Scandinavia, vol 7, World and regional geology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Kivioja LA (1967) Effects of mass transfers between land-supported ice caps and oceans on the shape of the earth and on the observed mean sea level. Bull Geod 1967:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kääriäinen E (1966) The second levelling of Finland. Publ Finn Geod Inst 61:1–313Google Scholar
  7. Lehmuskoski P, Saaranen V, Takalo M, Rouhiainen P (2008) Bench mark list of the third levelling of Finland. Publ Finn Geod Inst 139:1–220Google Scholar
  8. Mitrovica JX, Tamiciea ME, Davis JI, Milne GA (2001) Recent mass balance of polar ice sheets inferred from pattern of global sea level change. Nature 401:1026–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Niskanen E (1939) On the upheaval of land in Fennoscandia. Ann Acad Sci Fennicae AIII 10Google Scholar
  10. Peltier WR (1999) Global sea level rise and glacial isostatic adjustment. Global Planet Change 20:93–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sauramo M (1918) Geochronologische Studien über die spätglaziale Zeit in Südfinnland. Fennia 41(1) and Bull Comm Géol Finlande 50Google Scholar
  12. Sauramo M (1923) Studies on the Quaternary varve sediments in southern Finland, vol 60, Bull Comm Géol Finlande. Sällskapet för Finlands geografi, HelsingforsGoogle Scholar
  13. Tikkanen M, Oksanen J (2002) Late Weichselian and Holocene shore displacement history of the Baltic Sea in Finland. Fennia 180(1–2):9–20Google Scholar
  14. Topelius Z (1893) Maa suomalaistenkirjailijain ja taiteilijain esittämänä sanoin ja kuvin. Suomi 19:llä vuosisadalla. GW Edlund, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  15. Vermeer M (2010) Sea level rise in the Baltic Sea. Expert article 496, Baltic Rim Economics 28.4.2010Google Scholar
  16. Walcott RI (1972) Past sea levels, eustacy and deformation of the Earth. Quat Res 2:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finnish Geodetic InstituteMasalaFinland

Personalised recommendations