Skip to main content

Behavioral Conflict and Fairness in Social Networks

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7090))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We report on a series of behavioral experiments in social networks in which human subjects continuously choose to play either a dominant role (called a King) or a submissive one (called a Pawn). Kings receive a higher payoff rate, but only if all their network neighbors are Pawns, and thus the maximum social welfare states correspond to maximum independent sets. We document that fairness is of vital importance in driving interactions between players. First, we find that payoff disparities between network neighbors gives rise to conflict, and the specifics depend on the network topology. However, allowing Kings to offer “tips” or side payments to their neighbors substantially reduces conflict, and consistently increases social welfare. Finally, we observe that tip reductions lead to increased conflict. We describe these and a broad set of related findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G., Shiller, R.J.: Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akerlof, G.A., Yellen, J.L.: The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2), 255–283 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Berninghaus, S.K., Keser, C., Vogt, B.: Strategy choice and network effects. In: Ockenfels, A., Sadrieh, A. (eds.) The Selten School of Behavioral Economics, ch. 8, pp. 89–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A.: ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90(1), 166–193 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, R.: Social Psychology, 2nd edn. The Free Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Camerer, C.F.: Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.: Fairness, competition, and inequlity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehr, E., Gächter, S.: Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90(4), 980–994 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.K.: The Theory of Learning in Games. The MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garey, M.R., Johson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Judd, S., Kearns, M.: Behavioral experiments in networked trade. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Judd, S., Kearns, M., Vorobeychik, Y.: Behavioral dynamics and influence in networked coloring and consensus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(34), 14978–14982 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kearns, M., Judd, S., Tan, J., Wortman, J.: Behavioral experiments on biased voting in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(5), 1347–1352 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kearns, M., Suri, S., Montfort, N.: An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks. Science 313(5788), 824–827 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neugebauer, T., Poulsen, A., Schram, A.: Fairness and reciprocity in the Hawk Dove game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 66(2), 243–250 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M.: Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oprea, R., Henwood, K., Friedman, D.: Separating the Hawks from the Doves: Evidence from continuous time laboratory games. Working paper (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rabin, M.: Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83(5), 1281–1302 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Judd, S., Kearns, M., Vorobeychik, Y. (2011). Behavioral Conflict and Fairness in Social Networks. In: Chen, N., Elkind, E., Koutsoupias, E. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7090. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25510-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25510-6_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25509-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25510-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics