Advertisement

People’s Perception of Domestic Service Robots: Same Household, Same Opinion?

  • Julia Fink
  • Valérie Bauwens
  • Omar Mubin
  • Frédéric Kaplan
  • Pierre Dillenbourg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7072)

Abstract

The study presented in this paper examined people’s perception of domestic service robots by means of an ethnographic study. We investigated initial reactions of nine households who lived with a Roomba vacuum cleaner robot over a two week period. To explore people’s attitude and how it changed over time, we used a recurring questionnaire that was filled at three different times, integrated in 18 semi-structured qualitative interviews. Our findings suggest that being part of a specific household has an impact how each individual household member perceives the robot. We interpret that, even though individual experiences with the robot might differ from one other, a household shares a specific opinion about the robot. Moreover our findings also indicate that how people perceived Roomba did not change drastically over the two week period.

Keywords

attitudes towards robots domestic service robots human-robot interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gates, B.: A Robot in Every Home. In: Scientific American, pp. 58–65 (January 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 11(4), 342–365 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114(4), 864–886 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forlizzi, J.: How Robotic Products Become Social Products: An Ethnographic Study of Cleaning in the Home. In: HRI 2007 Proceedings, Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 129–136. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C.: Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A Study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. In: HRI 2006 Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pp. 258–265. ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sung, J., Grinter, R.E., Christensen, H.I.: Domestic Robot Ecology. International Journal of Social Robotics 2(4), 417–429 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M.V., Fornara, F.: Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Journal Universal Access in the Information Society 4(2), 146–155 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sung, J., Christensen, H.I., Grinter, R.E.: Sketching the Future: Assessing User Needs for Domestic Robots. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, pp. 153–158 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouir, C., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Werry, I.: What is a Robot Companion – Friend, Assistant or Butler? In: IEEE Robotics Society of Japan International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth edn. Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bell, G., Blythe, M., Gaver, B., Sengers, P., Wright, P.: Designing Culturally Situated Technologies for the Home. In: CHI 2003 Proceedings, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, pp. 1062–1063. ACM Press (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sung, J., Guo, L., Grinter, R.E., Christensen, H.I.: “My Roomba Is Rambo”: Intimate Home Appliances. In: Krumm, J., Abowd, G.D., Seneviratne, A., Strang, T. (eds.) UbiComp 2007. LNCS, vol. 4717, pp. 145–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kiesler, S., Goetz, J.: Mental models of robotic assistants. In: CHI 2002 Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 576–577. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venkatesh, A.: Computers and Other Interactive Technologies for the Home. Communications of the ACM 39(12), 47–54 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sung, J., Grinter, R.E., Christensen, H.I., Guo, L.: Housewives or Technophiles?: Under-standing Domestic Robot Owners. In: HRI 2008 Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 129–136. ACM Press (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sung, J., Christensen, H.I., Grinter, R.E.: Robots in the Wild: Understanding Long-term Use. In: HRI 2009 Proceedings, La Jolla, CA, USA, pp. 45–52. ACM Press (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Severinson-Eklundh, K., Green, A., Hüttenrauch, H.: Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 223–234 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hüttenrauch, H., Severinson-Eklundh, K.: Fetch-and-carry with CERO: Observations from a long-term study with a service robot. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Berlin, Germany, pp. 158–163 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koay, K.L., Syrdal, D.S., Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K.: Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants’ Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study. In: IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Jeju, Korea, pp. 564–569 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Venkatesh, A., Kruse, E., Chuan-Fong Shih, E.: The networked home: an analysis of current developments and future trends. Cognition, Technology, and Work 5, 23–32 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaplan, F.: Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 1(3), 1–16 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Fink
    • 1
  • Valérie Bauwens
    • 1
  • Omar Mubin
    • 1
  • Frédéric Kaplan
    • 1
  • Pierre Dillenbourg
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations