Advertisement

Motivating Children to Learn Arithmetic with an Adaptive Robot Game

  • Joris B. Janssen
  • Chrissy C. van der Wal
  • Mark A. Neerincx
  • Rosemarijn Looije
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7072)

Abstract

Based on a ‘learning by playing’ concept, a basic arithmetic learning task was extended with an engaging game to achieve long-term educational interaction for children. Personalization was added to this learning task, to further support the child’s motivation and success in learning. In an experiment, twenty children (aged 9-10) interacted three times, spread over days, with a robot using the combined imitation and arithmetic game to test this support. Two versions of the robot were implemented. In one implementation the complexity of the arithmetic progressed towards a predefined group target. In the other version the assignments increased in complexity until a personal end level was reached. A subsequent free-choice period showed that children’s motivation to play (and learn) was high, particularly when the game progressed to a personal target. Furthermore results show that most children in the last condition reach higher levels compared to the predefined group level.

Keywords

Intrinsic Motivation Social Robot Group Goal Arithmetic Skill Imitation Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borghouts, C., Buter, A., Dekker, J., Hoogenberg, E., Kopmels, D., van Oostenbrugge, M.: Interactie in Rekenen. In: Bazalt Educatieve Uitgaven (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, I., Looije, R., Neerincx, M.: Children’s Recognition of Emotions in Robots’ Face and Body. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI 2011), Lausanne, Switzerland, March 6-9 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Micera, S., Carrozza, M.C., Dario, P., Minuco, G.: Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 4(3) (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cornish, D., Dukette, D.: The Essential 20: Twenty Components of an Excellent Health Care Team. Rosedog Pr (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coyle, D., Doherty, G., Matthews, M., Sharry, J.: Computers in talk-based mental health interventions. Interacting with Computers 19(4), 545–562 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., Nakamura, J.: Handbook of Competence and Motivation. In: Flow, ch. 32, pp. 598–698. The Guilford Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deci, E.L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B.C., Leone, D.: Facilitating internalization: The Self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality 62, 119–142 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fasola, J., Matarić, M.J.: Robot Motivator: Increasing User Enjoyment and Performance on a Physical/Cognitive Task. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL), Ann Arbor, MI, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goffree, F., Oonk, W.: Reken Vaardig: op weg naar basale en professionele gecijferdheid. In: Noofdhoff Uitgevers B.V. (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Looije, R., Neerincx, M., de Lange, V.: Children’s responses and opinion on three bots that motivate, educate and play. Journal of Physical Agents 2, 13–20 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Markopoulos, P., Read, J., MacFarlane, S.: Evaluating children’s interactive products: principles and practices for interaction designers. Morgan Kaufmann Pub. (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plant, R., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic motivation and the effect of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally-controlling styles. Journal of Personality 53, 435–449 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reeve, J., Deci, E.L.: Elements of the Competitive Situation That Affect Intrinsic Motivation. Society for Personality and Social Psychology 22(1), 24–33 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robben, S.M.B.: Graduation Thesis: It’s NAO or Never! Facilitate Bonding Between a Child and a Social Robot: Exploring the Possibility of a Robot Adaptive to Personality (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence, a modern approach. Pearson Education, New Jersey (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vallerand, R., Gauvin, L., Halliwell, W.: Negative Effects of Competition on Children’s Intrinsic Motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology 126(5), 649–657 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woolf, B.: Building intelligent interactive tutors, vol. 3. Elsevier (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joris B. Janssen
    • 1
  • Chrissy C. van der Wal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark A. Neerincx
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rosemarijn Looije
    • 1
  1. 1.Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNOSoesterbergGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Sciences - dept. Computer ScienceVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science (EEMCS)Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations