Advertisement

Methodology of Open (Non-prick) Testing, Prick Testing, and Its Variants

  • Jean-Marie Lachapelle
  • Howard I. Maibach
Chapter

Abstract

An introductory remark needs some explanation. When immunological contact urticaria (ICU) (see Sect. 10.1.2) or protein contact dermatitis (PCD) (see Sect. 10.2) is suspected, it is considered that prick testing is the “key” diagnostic tool to detect the incriminated allergens. Nevertheless, some dermatologists are reluctant to practise prick testing, particularly in cases of ICU when general symptoms have been mentioned by the patient (see Sect. 10.1.1). This attitude is fully justified, and in those cases, it is wise to start the investigation with an open test. A first approach is to use the open test as such (see Sect. 7.2); another way to test is to use a Chamber Test, similar to that recommended in the atopy patch test (see Chap. 9). The results of such investigations need to be carefully interpreted, as they can lead to false-positive reactions.

Keywords

Food Allergen Natural Rubber Latex Intradermal Testing Codeine Phosphate Atopy Patch Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Basketter D, Lahti A (2011) Immediate contact reactions. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P (eds) Contact dermatitis, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goossens A, Amaro C (2011) Protein contact dermatitis. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P (eds) Contact dermatitis, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bindslev-Jensen C (2011) Skin tests for immediate hypersensitivity. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P (eds) Contact dermatitis, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oranje AP, Van Gysel D, Mulder PGH, Dieges PH (1994) Food-induced contact urticaria in atopic dermatitis patients: reproducibility of repeated and duplicate testing with a skin provocation test, the skin application food test (SAFT). Contact Dermatitis 31:314–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Position paper (1993) Allergen standardization and skin tests. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 48(Suppl 14):48–52Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourrain J-L (2009) Methodology for rapid readout tests. Ann Dermatol Venereol 136:661–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poulsen LK, Liisberg C, Bindslev-Jensen C (1993) Precise area determination of skin-prick tests: validation of a scanning device and software for a personal computer. Clin Exp Allergy 36:824–830Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (2008) Contact urticaria and contact urticaria syndrome (immediate contact reactions). In: Zhai H, Wilhelm K-P, Maibach HI (eds) Marzulli and Maibach’s dermatotoxicology, 7th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 525–536Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liccardi G, D’Amato G, Walter Canonica G, Salzillo A, Piccolo A, Passalacqua G (2006) Systemic reactions from skin testing: literature review. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 16:75–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cantani A, Micera M (2006) The prick by prick is safe and reliable in 58 children with atopic dermatitis and food allergy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 10:115–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dreborg S, Foucard T (1983) Allergy to apple, carrot and potato in children with birch pollen allergy. Allergy 38:167–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niinimaki A (1987) Scratch-chamber tests in food handler dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 16:11–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osterballe M, Scheller R, Stahl-Skov P, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C (2003) Diagnostic value of scratch-chamber test, skin prick test, histamine release and specific IgE in birch-allergic patients with oral allergy syndrome to apple. Allergy 58:950–953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Calabria CW, Hagen L (2008) The role of intradermal skin testing in inhalant allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 101:337–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henzgen M, Ballmer-Weber BK, Erdmann S et al (2008) Skin testing with food allergens. Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Physician’s Association of German Allergologists (ADA) and the Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA) together with the Swiss Society of Allergology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 6:983–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turjanmaa K, Palosuot T, Alenius H et al (1997) Latex allergy diagnosis: in vivo and in vitro standardization of a natural rubber latex extract. Allergy 52:41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turjanmaa K, Alenius H, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S et al (1995) Commercial skin prick test preparations in the diagnosis of rubber latex allergy (Abstract). J Allergy Clin Immunol 93:S299Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rancé F, Juchet A, Brémont F, Dutau G (1997) Correlations between skin prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, specific IgE, and food challenges. Allergy 52:1031–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ale SI, Maibach HI (2000) Occupational contact urticaria. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin, pp 200–216Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Marie Lachapelle
    • 1
  • Howard I. Maibach
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyCatholic University of LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Dermatology, School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations