Biomimetics pp 19-45 | Cite as

Modeling of Contact Angle for a Liquid in Contact with a Rough Surface

Chapter
Part of the Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering book series (BIOMEDICAL)

Abstract

The surface atoms or molecules of liquids or solids have fewer bonds with neighboring atoms, and therefore, they have higher energy than similar atoms and molecules in the interior. This additional energy is characterized quantitatively by the surface tension or free surface energy γ, which is equal to the work that is required to create a unit area of the surface at a constant pressure and temperature.

Keywords

Contact Angle Capillary Wave Static Contact Angle Contact Angle Hysteresis Triple Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. .
    Adamson AV (1990) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. .
    Anisimov MA (2007) Divergence of Tolman’s length for a droplet near the critical point. Phys Rev Lett 98:035702Google Scholar
  3. .
    Bahadur V, Garimella SV (2007) Electrowetting-based control of static droplet states on rough surfaces. Langmuir 23:4918–4924Google Scholar
  4. .
    Barbieri L, Wagner E, Hoffmann P (2007) Water wetting transition parameters of perfluorinated substrates with periodically distributed flat-top microscale obstavles. Langmuir 23:1723–1734Google Scholar
  5. .
    Bartell FE, Shepard JW (1953) Surface roughness as related to hysteresis of contact angles. J Phys Chem 57:455–458Google Scholar
  6. .
    Bhushan B (1999) Principles and applications of tribology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. .
    Bhushan B (2002) Introduction to tribology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. .
    Bhushan B, Jung YC (2007) Wetting study of patterned surfaces for superhydrophobicity. Ultramicroscopy 107:1033–1041Google Scholar
  9. .
    Bhushan B, Jung YC (2008) Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 20:225010Google Scholar
  10. .
    Bhushan B, Jung YC (2011) Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Prog Mater Sci 56:1–108Google Scholar
  11. .
    Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M (2010) The rose petal effect and the modes of superhydrophobicity. Philos Trans R Soc A 368:4713–4728Google Scholar
  12. .
    Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M, Jung YC (2007) Towards optimization of patterned superhydrophobic surfaces. J R Soc Interface 4:643–648Google Scholar
  13. .
    Bormashenko E, Pogreb R, Whyman G, Erlich M (2007) Cassie-Wenzel wetting transition in vibrated drops deposited on the rough surfaces: is dynamic Cassie-Wenzel transition 2D or 1D affair? Langmuir 23:6501–6503Google Scholar
  14. .
    Boruvka L, Neumann AW (1977) Generalization of the classical theory of capillarity. J Chem Phys 66:5464–5476Google Scholar
  15. .
    Cassie ABD (1948) Contact angles. Discuss Faraday Soc 3:11–16Google Scholar
  16. .
    Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551Google Scholar
  17. .
    Checco A, Guenoun P, Daillant J (2003) Nonlinear dependence of the contact angle of nanodroplets on contact line curvatures. Phys Rev Lett 91:186101Google Scholar
  18. .
    Cheng YT, Rodak DE, Angelopoulos A, Gacek T (2005) Microscopic observations of condensation of water on lotus leaves. Appl Phys Lett 87:194112Google Scholar
  19. .
    de Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quėrė D (2003) Capillarity and wetting phenomena. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. .
    Derjaguin BV, Churaev NV (1974) Structural component of disjoining pressure. J Colloid Interface Sci 49:249–255Google Scholar
  21. .
    Eustathopoulos N, Nicholas MG, Drevet B (1999) Wettability at high temperatures. Pergamon, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. .
    Extrand CW (2002) Model for contact angle and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir 18:7991–7999Google Scholar
  23. .
    Extrand CW (2003) Contact angle hysteresis on surfaces with chemically heterogeneous islands. Langmuir 19:3793–3796Google Scholar
  24. .
    Feng XJ, Feng L, Jin MH, Zhai J, Jiang L, Zhu DB (2004) Reversible super-hydrophobicity to super-hydrophilicity transition of aligned ZnO nanorod films. J Am Chem Soc 126:62–63Google Scholar
  25. .
    Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762–3765Google Scholar
  26. .
    Gupta P, Ulman A, Fanfan F, Korniakov A, Loos K (2005) Mixed self-assembled monolayer of alkanethiolates on ultrasmooth gold do not exhibit contact angle hysteresis. J Am Chem Soc 127:4–5Google Scholar
  27. .
    Israelachvili JN (1992) Intermolecular and surface forces, 2nd edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. .
    Israelachvili JN, Gee ML (1989) Contact angles on chemically heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 5:288–289Google Scholar
  29. .
    Johnson RE, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis. In: Fowkes FM (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion. Advances in chemistry series, vol 43. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 112–135Google Scholar
  30. .
    Jung YC, Bhushan B (2006) Contact angle, adhesion, and friction properties of micro- and nanopatterned polymers for superhydrophobicity. Nanotechnology 17, 4970–4980Google Scholar
  31. .
    Jung YC, Bhushan B (2007) Wetting transition of water droplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces. Scripta Mater 57:1057–1060Google Scholar
  32. .
    Jung YC, Bhushan B (2008a) Wetting behavior during evaporation and condensation of water microdroplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces. J Microsc 229:127–140Google Scholar
  33. .
    Jung YC, Bhushan B (2008b) Dynamic effects of bouncing water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 24:6262–6269Google Scholar
  34. .
    Kamusewitz H, Possart W, Paul D (1999) The relation between Young’s equilibrium contact angle and the hysteresis on rough paraffin wax surfaces. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 156:271–279Google Scholar
  35. .
    Kijlstra J, Reihs K, Klami A (2002) Roughness and topology of ultra-hydrophobic surfaces. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:521–529Google Scholar
  36. .
    Krupenkin TN, Taylor JA, Schneider TM, Yang S (2004) From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir 20:3824–3827Google Scholar
  37. .
    Lafuma A, Quėrė D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2:457–460Google Scholar
  38. .
    Li W, Amirfazli A (2006) A thermodynamic approach for determining the contact angle hysteresis for superhydrophobic surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 292:195–201Google Scholar
  39. .
    Marmur A, (2003) Wetting on hydrophobic rough surfaces: to be heterogeneous or not to be? Langmuir 19:8343–8348Google Scholar
  40. .
    Nosonovsky M (2007a) Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. Langmuir 23:3157–3161Google Scholar
  41. .
    Nosonovsky M (2007b) Model for solid-liquid and solid-solid friction for rough surfaces with adhesion hysteresis. J Chem Phys 126:224701Google Scholar
  42. .
    Nosonovsky M (2007c) On the range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie equations. Langmuir 23:9919–9920Google Scholar
  43. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2005) Roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsyst Technol 11:535–549Google Scholar
  44. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2006a) Stochastic model for metastable wetting of roughness-induced superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsyst Technol 12:231–237Google Scholar
  45. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2006b) Wetting of rough three-dimensional superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsyst Technol 12:273–281Google Scholar
  46. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007a) Multiscale friction mechanisms and hierarchical surfaces in nano- and bio-tribology. Mater Sci Eng R 58:162–193Google Scholar
  47. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007b) Hierarchical roughness makes superhydrophobic surfaces stable. Microelectron Eng 84:382–386Google Scholar
  48. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007c) Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces: multiscale approach. Nano Lett 7:2633–2637Google Scholar
  49. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007d) Hierarchical roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces. Ultramicroscopy 107:969–979Google Scholar
  50. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008a) Multiscale dissipative mechanisms and hierarchical surfaces: friction, superhydrophobicity, and biomimetics. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  51. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008b) Roughness-induced superhydrophobicity: a way to design non-adhesive surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 20:225009Google Scholar
  52. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008c) Biologically-inspired surfaces: broadening the scope of roughness. Adv Funct Mater 18:843–855Google Scholar
  53. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008d) Patterned non-adhesive surfaces: superhydrophobicity and wetting regime transitions. Langmuir 24:1525–1533Google Scholar
  54. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008e) Do hierarchical mechanisms of superhydrophobicity lead to self-organized criticality? Scripta Mater 59:941–944Google Scholar
  55. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008f) Energy transitions in superhydrophobicity: low adhesion, easy flow and bouncing. J Phys Condens Matter 20:395005Google Scholar
  56. .
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2009) Superhydrophobic surfaces and emerging applications: non-adhesion, energy, green engineering. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 14:270–280Google Scholar
  57. .
    Patankar NA (2004) Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough surfaces. Langmuir 20:7097–7102Google Scholar
  58. .
    Pompe T, Fery A, Herminghaus S (2000) Measurement of contact line tension by analysis of the three-phase boundary with nanometer resolution. In: Drelich J, Laskowski JS, Mittal KL (eds) Apparent and microscopic contact angles. VSP, Utrecht, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  59. .
    Quéré D (2005) Non-sticking drops. Rep Prog Phys 68:2495–2535Google Scholar
  60. .
    Sun M, Luo C, Xu L, Ji H, Ouyang Q, Yu D, Chen Y (2005) Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. Langmuir 21:8978–8981Google Scholar
  61. .
    Tretinnikov ON (2000) Wettability and microstructure of polymer surfaces: stereochemical and conformational aspects. In: Drelich J, Laskowski JS, Mittal KL (eds) Apparent and microscopic contact angles. VSP, Utrecht, pp 111–128Google Scholar
  62. .
    Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, Rutledge GC, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2007) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618–1622Google Scholar
  63. .
    Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of Solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng Chem 28:988–994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanoprobe Laboratory for Bio- and Nanotechnology and BiomimeticsOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations