Advertisement

Linking Geomechanical Modelling and Microseismic Observations at Weyburn

  • James P. Verdon
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

The above segment from the EU Parliament’s directive on \(\hbox{CO}_2\) storage highlights the need to develop models that are validated by observation. For reservoir fluid-flow models this involves history matching with injection and production rates, downhole pressure changes and \(\hbox{CO}_2\) plume geometry as imaged by controlled source seismics. However, can we also apply this to geomechanical models? Can we find ways to validate geomechanical models of sites like Weyburn with observables from the field?

Keywords

Injection Well Production Well Horizontal Well Seismic Anisotropy Shear Wave Splitting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Angus DA, Kendall J-M, Fisher QJ, Segura JM, Skachkov S, Crook AJL, Dutko M (2010) Modelling microseismicity of a producing reservoir from coupled fluid-flow and geomechanical simulation. Geophys Prospect 58(5):901–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown LT (2002) Integration of rock physics and reservoir simulation for the interpretation of time-lapse seismic data at Weyburn field, Saskatchewan. Master’s thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  3. Jimenez Gomez JA (2006) Geomechanical performance assessment of \(\hbox{CO}_{2}\)—EOR geological storage projects. Ph.D. thesis, University of AlbertaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag-Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations