Abstract
The water injection stage was initiated by perforation shots that penetrated the well at depths between 2,885 and 2,892 m. Water was then injected into the reservoir at high pressures. Immediately after injection, microseismic activity was recorded, which continued for the duration of the injection and a short while after. Figure 4.3 shows in detail the flow rates and injection pressures (at the surface) during injection, and the rate of microseismic activity. In total, 65 events were reliably identified and located.
Don’t force it, get a bigger hammer. Arthur Bloch
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Anboori ASS (2006) Anisotropy, focal mechanisms, and state of stress in an oilfiled: passive seismic monitoring in Oman. PhD thesis, University of Leeds
Eisner L, Duncan PM, Heigl WM, Keller WR (2009) Uncertainties in passive seismic monitoring. Leading Edge 28:648–655
Kendall J-M, Fisher QJ, Covey Crump S, Maddock J, Carter A, Hall SA, Wookey J, Valcke S, Casey M, Lloyd G, Ben Ismail W (2007) Seismic anisotropy as an indicator of reservoir quality of siliclastic rocks. In: Jolley S, Barr D, Walsh J, Knipe R (eds) Structurally complex reservoirs, vol. 292. Geological Society of London Special Publication, London, pp 123–136
Liu E, Crampin S, Booth DC (1989) Shear-wave splitting in cross-hole surveys: modeling. Geophys 54(1):57–65
Maxwell SC, Shemeta J, Campbell E, Quirk D (2008) Microseismic deformation rate monitoring, SPE 116596. Presented at the SPE annual technical conference
Sminchak J, Gupta N, Byrer C, Bergman P (2002) Issues related to seismic activity induced by the injection of \(\hbox{CO}_{2}\) in deep saline aquifers. J Eng Environ Res 2:32–46
Teanby NA, Kendall J-M, van der Baan M (2004) Automation of shear-wave splitting measurements using cluster analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(2):453–463
Thomsen L (1986) Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophys 51(10):1954–1966
Verdon JP, Kendall J-M, Wüstefeld A (2009) Imaging fractures and sedimentary fabrics using shear wave splitting measurements made on passive seismic data. Geophys J Int 179(2): 1245–1254
Wüstefeld A, Bokelmann G (2007) Null detection in shear-wave splitting measurements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(4):1204–1211
Wüstefeld A, Al-Harrasi O, Verdon JP, Wookey J, Kendall J-M (2010) A strategy for automated analysis of passive microseismic data to study seismic anisotropy and fracture characteristics. Geophys Prospect 58(5):755–773
Zimmer U, Maxwell S, Waltman C, Warpinski N (2007) Microseismic monitoring quality-control (QC) reports as an interpretative tool for nonspecialists, SPE 110517. Presented at the SPE annual technical conference
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Verlag-Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verdon, J.P. (2012). A Comparison of Microseismic Monitoring of Fracture Stimulation Due to Water Versus \(\hbox{CO}_{2}\) Injection. In: Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 Storage in Subsurface Reservoirs. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25388-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25388-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25387-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25388-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)