Skip to main content

What Determines Public Perceptions of Implantable Medical Technology: Insights into Cognitive and Affective Factors

  • Conference paper
Book cover Information Quality in e-Health (USAB 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7058))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Medical Technology is one of the rising branches of technology development within the last decades. Especially device miniaturization is enormously progressing what makes implantable technology to a promising approach for the future. Especially in times of the demographic change implantable medical technology could play its part in the delivery of healthcare services, supporting an independent and mobile aging. From a technical point of view, implants are far-developed and will enter the market in the next years. From a human factors’ point of view, there is a considerable lack of acceptance-related knowledge and understanding of perceived benefits and barriers across a diverse population. Using a qualitative approach, this study gains insights into public perceptions of implantable medical technology, the level of information revealing misconceptions and basic fears. It thus explores cognitive and affective factors that form the acceptance of implantable medical technology. Results allow the identification of information and technical communication deficits in order to derive a sensitive information and communication policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Trenk, D., Neumann, F.-J.: Drug-eluting coronary stents: as safe as bare-metal stents, but optimized antiplatelet therapy further improve clinical outcome. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 64, 227–232 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnakenberg, U., Krüger, C., Pfeffer, J.-G., Mokwa, W., vom Bögel, G., Günther, R., Schmitz-Rode, T.: Intravascular pressure monitoring system. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 110, 61–67 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmitz-Rode, T.: Vascular capsule for telemetric monitoring of blood pressure. RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 175, 282–286 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, A.D.: Evolution and acceptability of medical applications of RFID implants among early users of technology. Health Mark Q 24, 121–155 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A Small but Significant Difference – The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheermesser, M., Kosow, H., Rashid, A., Holtmann, C.: User acceptance of pervasive computing in healthcare: Main findings of two case studies. In: Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth 2008, pp. 205–213 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arning, K., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: “Same Same but Different” How Service Contexts of Mobile Technologies Shape Usage Motives and Barriers. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 34–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Alagöz, F., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W.: Openness to accept medical technology – a cultural view. Full paper submitted to the 7th Conference of the Austrian Computer Society: Human-Computer Interaction: Information Quality in eHealth. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiedeler, U.: Stand der Technik neuronaler Implantate. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (ed.) The ethical aspects of ICT implants in the human body. In: Proceedings of the Roundtable Debate. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behaviour Information Technology 28, 251–268 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Gender differences in acceptance and attitudes towards an invasive medical stent. eJournal Health Informatics 6(2), e13, 1–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future home environments. In: Ziefle, M., Röcker, C. (eds.) Human-Centred Design of eHealth Technologies, Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 95–126. IGI Global, Hersehy

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ziefle, M., Röcker, C.: Acceptance of Pervasive Healthcare Systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts. In: 4th ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W.: Technology acceptability for medical assistance. In: 4th ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (CD Rom) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Technical Expertise and Its Influence on the Acceptance of Future Medical Technologies: What Is Influencing What to Which Extent? In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 513–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 475–487 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siegrist, M.: The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology. Risk Analysis 20(2), 195–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peters, E., Slovic, P.: The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26(16), 1427–1453 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Covello, V.T.: The perception of technological risks: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 23(4), 285–297 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Otway, H.J., Pahner, P.D.: Risk assessment. Futures 8(2), 122–134 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S.: Why Study Risk Perception? Risk Analysis 2(2), 83–93 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Holzinger, A.: Medical Technology in Smart Homes: Exploring the User’s Perspective on Privacy, Intimacy and Trust. In: The 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Security Aspects of Process and Services Engineering (SAPSE 2011), 35th Annual IEEE Computer Software and Applications Conference, Munich, Germany, July 18-22 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M. (2011). What Determines Public Perceptions of Implantable Medical Technology: Insights into Cognitive and Affective Factors. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, KM. (eds) Information Quality in e-Health. USAB 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7058. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25363-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25364-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics