Openness to Accept Medical Technology - A Cultural View

  • Firat Alagöz
  • Martina Ziefle
  • Wiktoria Wilkowska
  • André Calero Valdez
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7058)


Technology acceptance is a widely acknowledged key player in explaining technology adoption. However, there is a notable knowledge gap concerning the impact of cultural factors on technology acceptance, especially in the medical sector. It is evident though that countries differ greatly regarding their technical proneness, development and usage habits what should have considerable impact on acceptance. This study compares the openness to accept medical technology in Germany, Poland and Turkey. 300 respondents (19-85 years, 56% women, 38% chronically ill) participated in a survey, in which the pros and cons for using medical technologies were examined as well as the underlying acceptance motives and utilization barriers. The effects of different cultures, but also of age, gender and health status were analyzed regarding their impact on acceptance patterns. Results reveal both, culturally insensitive as well culturally sensitive acceptance, with strong effects of gender and exercising frequency. Overall, the study corroborates the importance of cultural views on technology acceptance.


cross-cultural survey technology acceptance medical technology cardiac illness acceptance barriers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–337 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A Small but Significant Difference – The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future home environments. In: Ziefle, M., Röcker, C. (eds.) Human-Centred Design of eHealth Technologies, pp. 95–126. IGI Global, Hershey (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ziefle, M., Jakobs, E.-M.: New challenges in Human Computer Interaction: Strategic Directions and Interdisciplinary Trends. In: 4th International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing Technologies, pp. 389–398. University of Stellenbosch, South Africa (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Understanding differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Computers in Human Behaviour 23(6), 2904–2927 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Different Perspectives on Technology Acceptance: The Role of Technology Type and Age. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 20–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 312–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Gender differences in acceptance and attitudes towards an invasive medical stent. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics 6(2), e13, 1–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Kähkönen, E., Kommers, P.: Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Communications of the ACM 49(1), 126–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers, Y.: The Changing Face of Human-Computer Interaction in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maguire, M., Osman, Z.: Designing for older and inexperienced mobile phone users. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI: Inclusive Design in the Information Society, pp. 439–443. LEA, Mahwah (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Straub, D., Keil, M., Brenner, W.: Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management 33(1), 1–11 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Straub, D., Loch, K., Hill, C.: Transfer of Information technology to the Arab World: A test of Cultural influence modeling. In: Dadashuadeh, M. (ed.) Information Technology Management in Developing Countries, pp. 92–151. IRM Press, Hershey (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alagöz, F., Calero Valdez, A., Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Dorner, S., Holzinger, A.: From Cloud Computing to Mobile Internet, From User Focus to Culture and Hedonism: The Crucible of Mobile Health Care and Wellness Applications. In: IEEE 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications, pp. 38–45 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teo, T., Su Luan, W., Sing, C.C.: A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: an application of the TAM. Educational Technology & Society 11(4), 265–280 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arenas-Gaitána, J., Ramírez-Correab, P., Rondán-Cataluñaa, F.: Cross cultural analysis of the use and perceptions of web Based learning systems. Computers & Education 57(2), 1762–1774 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Srite, M., Karahanna, E.: The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance. MIS Quarterly 30, 3 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences. In: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage, Beverly-Hills (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leidner, D., Kayworth, T.: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly 30, 2 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kedia, B., Bhagat, R.: Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology across Nations. Academy of Management Review 13(4), 471–559 (1988)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choon, Y.-Y.: Cross-Cultural Issues in Human-Computer Interaction. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, pp. 1063–1069. Taylor & Francis, London (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anandarajan, M., Igbaria, M., Anakwe, U.: IT acceptance in a less-developed country: a motivational factor perspective. International Journal of Information Management 22(1), 47–65 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pai, F.-Y., Huang, K.: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(4), 650–660 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campiniha-Bacote, J.: The Process of Cultural Competence in the delivery of Health care Services: A Model of Care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 13(3), 181–184 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klessig, J.: Cross-cultural Medicine A Decade Later. The Effect of Values and Culture on Life-Support Decisions. The Western Journal of Medicine 157, 316–322 (1992)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Searight, H., Gafford, J.: Cultural Diversity at the End of Life: Issues and Guidelines for Family Physicians. American Family Physician 71(3), 515–525 (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berger, J.T.: Cultural discrimination in mechanisms for health decisions: a view from New York. Journal of Clinical Ethics 9, 127–131 (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ziefle, M., Röcker, C., Holzinger, A.: Medical Technology in Smart Homes: Exploring the User’s Perspective on Privacy, Intimacy and Trust. In: Proc. of the 3rd International IEEE Workshop on Security Aspects of Process and Services Engineering (SAPSE 2011), 35th Annual IEEE Computer Software and Applications Conference, Munich, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Arning, K., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: “Same Same But Different”. How Service Contexts of Mobile Technologies Shape Usage Motives and Barriers. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 34–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oakes, W.: External validity and the use of real people as subjects. American Psychologist 27(7), 959–962 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peterson, R.A.: On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 28(3), 450–461 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., Lang, A.-G.: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 41, 1149–1160 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ziefle, M.: The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology 21(5), 303–311 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khatri, P., Blumenthal, J.A., Babyak, M.A., Craighead, W.E., Herman, S., Baldewicz, T., Madden, D.J., Doraiswamy, M., Waugh, R., Krishnan, K.R.: Effects of exercise training on cognitive functioning among depressed older men and women. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 9(1), 43–57 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Digman, J.M.: Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41, 417–440 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M., Alagöz, F., Holzinger, A.: Mental Models of Menu Structures in Diabetes Assistants. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6180, pp. 584–591. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M., Horstmann, A., Herding, D., Schroeder, U.: Effects of Aging and Domain Knowledge on Usability in Small Screen Devices for Diabetes Patients. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 366–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chau, P.Y.K., Hu, P.J.H.: Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management 39(4), 297–311 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hassink, R.: Technology transfer infrastructures: Some lessons from experiences in Europe, the US and Japan. European Planning Studies 5(3), 351–370 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alagöz, F., Wilkowska, W., Roefe, D., Klack, L., Ziefle, M., Schmitz-Rode, T.: Technik ohne Herz? Nutzungsmotive und Akzeptanzbarrieren medizintechnischer Systeme aus der Sicht von Kunstherzpatienten. In: Proceedings of the Third Ambient Assisted Living Conference (AAL 2010), January 26-27. VDE Verlag, Berlin, CD-ROM (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Holzinger, A., Baernthaler, M., Pammer, W., Katz, H., Bjelic-Radisic, V., Ziefle, M.: Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69(9), 563–570 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Wernbacher, M.: The effect of previous exposure to technology on acceptance and its importance in usability and accessibility engineering. Universal Access in the Information Society 10(3), 245–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Firat Alagöz
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  • Wiktoria Wilkowska
    • 1
  • André Calero Valdez
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Technology Centre (Humtec)RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations