Evaluation of Mountain Road Influences on Driving Fatigue

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 115)

Abstract

Driving fatigue was caused by complicated road alignments in mountains. In order to evaluate road environments on driving fatigue, the driver subjective feeling of tiredness, driving operating and psychophysiology records, and their sub-factors were adopted as evaluation factors. on the basis of group multicriteria decision making and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, the driving fatigue hierarchic fuzzy evaluation model was established, and a simplified scale method was adopted to generate the judgment matrices meeting the consistency checking firstly. the professional drivers’ opinions were aggregated to form triangle fuzzy numbers with fuzzy Delphi method. Finally different influences on driving fatigue were ranked with total utility values of fuzzy numbers and the optimal alternative could be selected. An example was given, under this approach, show that the decision making process was a systematic and practical method for evaluation of the driver selection.

Keywords

driving fatigue group multicriteria decision making fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) fuzzy ranking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, W., Shun, F.: Driving Behaviour Theory and Its Application in Road Traffic System. Science Press, Beijing (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, D.: Determination of factors affecting driving fatigue by analytical hierarchy process. Process in Safety Science and Technology 3, 46–50 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Analyzes of characteristics and reasons of passenger vehicle super-large traffic accidents (June 2006), http://www.cps.com.cn/ebook/ly.asp?id=55
  4. 4.
    Kwong, K.C., Bai, H.: A Fuzzy FAHP Approach to the Determination of Importance Weights of Customer Requirements in Quality Function Deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13, 367–377 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanadtang, Park, P., Joo, D., Shinya, H.: Incorporating uncertain and incomplete subjective judgments into the evaluation procedure of transportation demand management alternatives. Transportation 32, 603–626 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrrera, F., Martínez, L., Sánchez, P.J.: Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166, 115–132 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mao, J.: Advances of Fatigue Detecting Technology for Drivers. China Safety Science Journal 15, 108–112 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stephen, H.: Failrclough Monitoring Driver fatigue via driving performance. Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces 130, 221–235 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heitmann, A., Guttkuhn, R., Aguirre, A.: Technologies for the Monitoring and Prevention of Driver Fatigue. In: Proceedings of the First International Driving Symposium on Human Factor in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.China National Institute of StandardizationBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of AutomobileChang’an UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations