Advertisement

The Boundary Element Method for Viscoelasticity Problems

  • Severino P. C. Marques
  • Guillermo J. Creus
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

The Boundary Element Method (BEM) is derived through the discretization of an integral equation (the classical Somigliana identity, first published in 1886). An interesting account of BEM early development may be found in (Cheng and Cheng 2005). This formulation can only be derived for certain classes of problems and hence, is not as widely applicable as the finite element method. However, when applicable, it often results in numerical methods that are easier to use and computationally more efficient. The advantages of the BEM arise from the fact that only the boundary of the domain requires sub-division. In cases where the domain is exterior to the boundary (e.g. the atmosphere surrounding an airplane, the soil surrounding a tunnel, the material surrounding a crack tip) the advantages of the BEM are even greater as the equation governing the infinite domain is reduced to an equation over the (finite) boundary. In this chapter we shortly review two alternative procedures for the solution of problems in linear viscoelasticity: the solution in the Laplace transformed domain and the use of a general inelastic formulation. For the latter, we make reference to the use of the Dual Reciprocity Method (DRM) that allows a pure boundary formulation.

References

  1. 1.
    C.A. Brebbia, J.C.F. Telles, L.C. Wrobel, Boundary Element Technique (Springer, Berlin, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.H.D. Cheng, D.T. Cheng, Heritage and early history of the boundary element method. Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem 29, 268–302 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Gaul, M. Schanz, A comparative study of three boundary element approaches to calculate the transient response of viscoelastic solids with unbounded domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 179, 111–123 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Liu, H. Antes, Application of visco-elastic boundary element method to creep problems in chemical engineering structures. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 70(1), 27–31 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.D. Mesquita, H.B. Coda, Boundary integral equation method for general viscoelastic analysis. Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 2643–2664 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.W. Partridge, C.A. Brebbia, L.C. Wrobel, The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method (Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton, 1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Schanz, H. Antes, A new visco- and elastodynamic time domain boundary element formulation. Comput. Mech. 20(5), 452–459 (1997)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Sensale, P.W. Partridge, G.J. Creus, General boundary elements solution for ageing viscoelastic structures. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 50, 1455–1468 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Syngellakis, Boundary element methods for polymer analysis. Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem. 27, 125–135 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Authors 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de TecnologiaUniversidade Federal de AlagoasMaceióBrazil
  2. 2.ILEAUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations