The Mental Ability of Birds Takes Many Forms

Chapter

Abstract

The similarities between the genes of humans and those of birds are reflected in their cognition capacity. Birds are capable of advanced forms of behaviour and can surmount difficult situations surpassing mammals in many respects.

They can use their feet as tools to manipulate food but they can also build their own tools, such as inserting twigs in crevices to catch insects.

The crows are so mentally advanced that they have been compared to the great apes in their ability to solve problems related to their way of life.

The gene which impairs speech production in humans is the same that affects the singing of zebra finches and canaries.

Migration is usually not described as part of avian behaviour or cognition. But it turns out that the long journeys that birds regularly perform have demanded innovation and novel solutions associated with empirical experience. Not only the sun, the stars and the magnetic field have been used as cues in this process but besides the birds have been able to adjust to changes in their location and strength.

Keywords

Zebra Finch Cooperative Breeding Magnetic Compass Homing Pigeon Woodpecker Finch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Attenborough D (1987) The first Eden. The Mediterranean world and man. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker R (1980) The mystery of migration. Macdonald and Jane’s, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyle WA, Conway CJ (2007) Why migrate? A test of the evolutionary precursor hypothesis. Am Nat 169(3):344–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doyle P et al (1994) The key to earth history. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2004) The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in Corvids and apes. Science 306:1903–1907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gahr M et al (1993) Estrogen receptors in the avian brain: survey reveals general distribution and forebrain areas unique to songbirds. J Comp Neurol 327:112–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haesler S et al (2007) Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus area X. PLoS Biol 5:2885–2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Honour H, Fleming J (2002) A world history of art. Laurence King Publishing Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Katzir G (1993) Visual mechanisms of prey capture in water birds. In: Zeigler HP, Bischof H-J (eds) Vision, brain, and behavior in birds, A Bradford Book. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 30–315Google Scholar
  10. Komdeur J (2003) Daughters on request: about helpers and egg sexes in the Seychelles warbler. Proc R Soc Lond Biol 270:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kral K (2003) Behavioural-analytical studies of the role of head movements in depth perception in insects, birds and mammals. Behav Process 64:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kubikova L et al (2010) Dopamine receptors in a songbird brain. J Comp Neurol 518(6):741–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Lawick-Goodall J (1970) Tool-using in primates and other vertebrates. Adv Study Behav 3:195–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lefebvre L et al (2002) Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour 139:939–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lohmann KJ (2010) Magnetic-field perception. Nature 464:1140–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marler P (1996) Social cognition. Are primates smarter than birds? In: Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED (eds) Current ornithology, vol 13. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mouritsen H, Larsen ON (2001) Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use stellar cues for a time-independent compass. J Exp Biol 204:3855–3865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Muheim R et al (2006) Calibration of magnetic and celestial compass cues in migratory birds – a review of cue-conflict experiments. J Exp Biol 209:2–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagy M et al (2010) Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature 464:890–893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perrins C (1976) Bird life. Elsevier Phaidon, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  21. Pough FH et al (2005) Vertebrate life. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Rodgers CT, Hore PJ (2009) Chemical magnetoreception in birds: the radical pair mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(2):353–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Salewski V, Bruderer B (2007) The evolution of bird migration – a synthesis. Naturwissenschaften 94:268–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seed A et al (2009) Intelligence in Corvids and apes: a case of convergent evolution? Ethology 115:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen P et al (1995) An atlas of aromatase mRNA expression in the zebra finch brain. J Comp Neurol 360:172–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. West MJ, King AP (1990) Mozart’s starling. Am Sci 78:106–114Google Scholar
  27. Wiltschko R et al (2010) Directional orientation of birds by the magnetic field under different light conditions. J R Soc Interf 7:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zirker JB (2009) The magnetic universe. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cell and Organism BiologyLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.LundSweden

Personalised recommendations