Rereading in Interactive Stories: Constraints on Agency and Procedural Variation

  • Alex Mitchell
  • Kevin McGee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7069)

Abstract

A central problem for interactive storytelling research is how to create a story which procedurally varies as the result of a user’s actions, while still feeling like a story. Research has largely concentrated on how to provide coherent variations each time a user experiences an interactive story, without consideration for the relationship between subsequent experiences. This paper examines the issues that arise when designing an interactive story system which is intended to be reread as the result of a reframing. Through a discussion of several types of reframing drawn from non-interactive films, we argue that, when an interactive story makes use of a reframing to encourage rereading, the requirements for narrative coherence, selection and ordering extend across reading sessions. This introduces constraints in terms of what can be varied procedurally in response to user actions which do not occur in interactive stories which are not explicitly designed to be reread.

Keywords

Interactive storytelling rereading constraints agency procedural variation reframing coherence selection ordering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mateas, M.: A preliminary poetics for interactive drama and games. Digital Creativity 12(3), 140–152 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Character-based interactive storytelling. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on AI in Interactive Entertainment, 17–24 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riedl, M.O., Saretto, C.J., Young, R.M.: Managing interaction between users and agents in a multi-agent storytelling environment. In: AAMAS, pp. 741–748 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Si, M., Marsella, S.C., Riedl, M.O.: Interactive drama authoring with plot and character: An intelligent system that fosters creativity. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Creative Intelligent Systems, Palo Alto, California (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Towards integrating plot and character for interactive drama. In: Socially Intelligent Agents: The Human in the Loop, AAAI Symposium (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lavik, E.: Narrative structure in the sixth sense: A new twist in “twist movies”? The Velvet Light Trap 58, 55–64 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitchell, A., McGee, K.: Limits of rereadability in procedural interactive stories. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 1939–1948. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatman, S.B.: Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Cornell University Press (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Mitchell
    • 1
  • Kevin McGee
    • 1
  1. 1.National University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations