Back-Leading through Character Status in Interactive Storytelling

  • Jichen Zhu
  • Kenneth Ingraham
  • J. Michael Moshell
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7069)

Abstract

A key challenge in computer-based interactive narrative is the conflict between user agency and authorial control of the story quality. Valuable lessons can be learned from improvisational and especially interactive theatre, where various narrative and interactive strategies have been developed to engage users in the process of co-creating the story. In this paper, we focus on the use of character status and status shifts. Specifically, we present and illustrate a computational model of status shifts based on the cognitive semantics theory of force dynamics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aarseth, E.: Genre trouble: Narrativism and the art of simulation. In: Wardrip-Fruin, N., Harrigan, P. (eds.) First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, pp. 45–55. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aylett, R., Louchart, S.: Towards a narrative theory for virtual reality. Virtual Reality 7(1), 2–9 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ballin, D., Gillies, M.F., Crabtree, I.B.: A framework for interpersonal attitude and non-verbal communication in improvisational visual media production. In: First European Conference on Visual Media Production IEE, London, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Character-based interactive storytelling. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(4), 17–24 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuller, D., Magerko, B.: Shared mental models in improvisational performance. In: Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies at the Foundations of Digital Games Conference, Monterey, CA (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayes-Roth, B., Gent, R.V.: Improvisational puppets, actors, and avatars. In: Proceedings of the Computer Game Developers’ Conference (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izzo, G.: Acting Interactive Theatre: a Handbook. Heinemann, Portsmouth (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnstone, K.: Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre. Theatre Arts Books, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.S.: Solving the Narrative Paradox in VEs – Lessons from RPGs. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 244–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magerko, B., Manzoul, W., Riedl, M., Baumer, A., Fuller, D., Luther, K., Pearce, C.: An empirical study of cognition and theatrical improvisation. In: Proceeding of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 117–126 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mateas, M., Stern, A.: A behavior language for story-based believable agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(4), 39–47 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perlin, K., Goldberg, A.: Improv: A system for scripting interactive actors in virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH 1996), pp. 205–215 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryan, M.L.: Beyond myth and metaphor -the case of narrative in digital media. Game Studies 1(1) (2001), http://gamestudies.org/0101/ryan/
  14. 14.
    Spolin, V.: Improvisation for the Theater. Northwestern Univ. Press, Evanston (1963/1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Swartjes, I., Kruizinga, E., Theune, M.: Let’s Pretend I Had a Sword. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 264–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Talmy, L.: Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1), 49–100 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wirth, J.: Interactive Acting. Fall Creek Press, Fall Creek (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jichen Zhu
    • 1
  • Kenneth Ingraham
    • 2
  • J. Michael Moshell
    • 3
  1. 1.Antoinette Westphal College of Media Arts & DesignDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Interactor Simulation Systems, LLCOrlandoUSA
  3. 3.School of Visual Arts and DesignUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations