Complexity and Safety
Complexity is overwhelming the traditional approaches to preventing accidents in engineered systems and new approaches are necessary. This paper identifies the most important types of complexity related to safety and discusses what is necessary to prevent accidents in our increasingly complex engineered systems.
KeywordsHuman Error Safety Culture Component Failure Qualitative Comparative Analysis Ballistic Missile
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arnold, R.: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of STAMP and SOAM in ATM Occurrence Investigation, Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Sweden (June 2009)Google Scholar
- Dekker, S.: The field guide to understanding human error. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. (2006)Google Scholar
- Dekker, S.: Ten Questions About Human Error: A New View of Human Factors and System Safety. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Inc., Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
- Ishimatsu, T., Leveson, N., Thomas, J., Katahira, M., Miyamoto, Y., Nakao, H.: Modeling and Hazard Analysis using STPA. In: Proceedings of the International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety Conference, Huntsville, Alabama (May 2010)Google Scholar
- Leveson, N.: Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press (December 2011), downloadable from http://sunnyday.mit.edu/safer-world/safer-world.pdf
- Leveson, N.G.: Safeware: System Safety and Computers. Addison-Wesley Publishers, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
- Nelson, P.S.: A STAMP Analysis of the LEX Comair 5191 Accident. Master’s thesis, Lund University, Sweden (June 2008)Google Scholar
- Pereira, S., Lee, G., Howard, J.: A System-Theoretic Hazard Analysis Methodology for a Non-advocate Safety Assessment of the Ballistic Missile Defense System. In: Proceedings of the 2006 AIAA Missile Sciences Conference, Monterey, CA (November 2006)Google Scholar
- Perrow, C.: Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technology. Princeton University Press (1999)Google Scholar