Skip to main content

Economic Analysis and Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Balancing Renewable Electricity

Abstract

Having discussed technical requirements, potentials and costs for balancing technologies in the previous sections, this chapter investigates problems in a market economy with electricity supply that changes with weather conditions and incentives to balance supply and demand (see Sect. 7.1). This is followed by an analysis of the reasons and potentials for politically manipulating economic framework conditions (see Sect. 7.2). The results are finally summarised and concluded in Sect. 7.3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These sentences and in general all others should be read as ceteris paribus formulations. This means that other aspects are held constant for the sake of the argument. In particular, the structure of the system may change and then other effects could appear as well. Still another aspect is that shifts in demand may lead to movements up or down the average cost curve. Such effects cannot be discussed though without introductions to very specific properties of technologies.

  2. 2.

    Stadler (2008) discusses technologies that can be used for this mechanism.

  3. 3.

    Problems regarding norms, standards, law and the economic integration of virtual power stations in the whole energy system are discussed at length in Droste-Franke et al. (2009).

  4. 4.

    See the model and evidence for Scandinavian countries in Försund and Hjalmarsson (2010).

  5. 5.

    Efficient nodal pricing allows in principle for regional price differences whenever local bottlenecks lead to relatively high supply or demand. In the German system, law currently imposes uniform prices, because they are held to be desirable. However, they also have the disadvantage that incentives to remove bottlenecks are suppressed because average prices are inefficient signals. The ideal solution to this dilemma is to achieve uniform prices through efficient investment, rather than administrative measures. Försund and Hjalmarsson (2010) suggest increases in transmission capacity as an efficient response to excess supply in four Swedish price areas. As volatility can be very strong, for example, in West Denmark consumers and other buyers may want to have some limitations to price fluctuations. Allowing for regional price differences within a small corridor, in combination with an obligation to remove bottlenecks within a certain time scale could be a good compromise that protects consumers without suppressing signals and leaving some incentives for investment.

  6. 6.

    An extensive discussion can be found in Ziesemer (2008).

  7. 7.

    The conceptually corresponding signals of disequilibria during recessions are downward deviations of inventories in goods markets and upward deviations from equilibrium unemployment.

  8. 8.

    China has announced the intention to enforce environmental policy through the (non) allocation of credit.

  9. 9.

    Currently, firms producing emissions must have as many certificates as they have emissions on April 30 every year.

  10. 10.

    The Future Investment Program (ZIP) of the German Ministry of Environment supported R&D in 2001–2003 for CSP.

  11. 11.

    CIF (2010) does not mention Desertec, but it seems to fit in perfectly.

  12. 12.

    In the USA, investment in CSP is supported by tax credits (Handelsblatt).

  13. 13.

    For funding of electricity grids see Koenig et al. (2004).

  14. 14.

    The WTO limits the allowance for subsidies to 20% of the respective investment. If investment in the energy sector, I e , is, for example, 5% of all investment, I, and investment is 20% of GDP we get sI e /GDP = sI e (I/GDP)/I = 0.2 × 0.05 × 0.2 = 0.002. This means that subsidies are one fifth or a percent of GDP. If this is carried equally by all sectors it does not seem very much. However, the corresponding tax burden imposed on the polluter alone may be very high and may cause high adjustment costs and losses in international competitiveness.

  15. 15.

    Other interesting examples for abandoning are cases of national sovereignty, where it is not possible to impose the polluter pays principle. In the dolphin/tuna case and the turtle/shrimp case, US subsidies paid for environmentally benign fishing technologies, which avoided catching dolphins and turtles.

  16. 16.

    The question here is how to reduce: at equal percentage rates, or equal amounts of money of, which percentage rates, how many steps, percentage rates of the initial values of the remaining tariffs or subsidies, etc.

  17. 17.

    See FiFo et al. (2009); for example, tax credits in sea transport are characterised as adequate whereas those for agriculture and forest sectors are characterised as too high.

  18. 18.

    Of course, recent criticism regarding the implementation of startup subsidies should be taken into account. However, they should be based on a sound integration of subsidies into the empirical work (see Santarelli and Vivarelli 2002). Moreover, as the justification is mostly related to externalities and capital market imperfection, good indicators for these should be used as well (see Kösters 2009).

  19. 19.

    Gas-fired power stations may also provide this benefit, but it is beyond the scope of this project to judge subsidies for gas.

References

  • Aghion P, Hemous D, Veugelers R (2009a) No green growth without innovation. Bruegel Policy Brief 2009/07

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Veugelers R, Serre C (2009b) Cold start for the green innovation machine. Bruegel Policy Brief 2009/12

    Google Scholar 

  • Angerer G, Marscheider-Weidemann F, Wendl M, Wietschel M (2009) Lithium für Zukunftstechnologien, Nachfrage und Angebot unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Elektromobilität. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • BNetzA (2009) Leitfaden zu Inhalt und Struktur von Anträgen auf Genehmigung von Investitionsbudgets nach § 23 Abs. 3 ARegV im Bereich Elektrizität 2009. Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünger U, Crotogino F, Donadei S, Gatzen C, Glaunsinger W, Kleinmaier M, Könemund M, Landinger H, Lebioda TJ, Leonhard W, Sauer D, Weber H, Wenzel A, Wolf E, Woyke W, Zunft S (2009) Energiespeicher in Stromversorgungssystemen mit hohem Anteil erneuerbarer Energieträger, ETG Task Force Energiespeicher, Energietechnische Gesellschaft im VDE (ETG). VDE, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann R (2008) Forschungsförderung im Bereich Solarthermische Kraftwerke. CSP-Workshop, Berlin, 20/11/2008

    Google Scholar 

  • CIF (2010) Concentrated solar power in the Middle East and North Africa. Climate Investment Funds (CIF). www.climateinvestmentfunds.org. Accessed 14 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Climate Change (2009) Meeting carbon budgets – the need for a step change. Progress report to Parliament. http://downloads.theccc.org.uk/docs/21667%20CCC%20Executive%20Summary%20AW%20v4.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan TM (2009) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions with a tax or cap: implications for efficiency and cost effectiveness. Natl Tax J LXII:535–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing T, Anthoff D, Butterfield R, Ceronsky M, Grubb M, Guo J, Hepburn C, Hope C, Hunt A, Li A, Markandya A, Moss S, Nyong A, Tol R, Watkiss P (2005) Social cost of carbon: a closer look at uncertainty. Final project report. Stockholm Environment Institute, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent (2010) ecoinvent data v2.2 – updated reports and tools online. Ecoinvent Centre – Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Empa/Technology & Society Lab (TSL), Switzerland. www.ecoinvent.org/news/newsdtails/ansicht/ecoinvent-data-v22-updated-reports-and-tools-online/137/

    Google Scholar 

  • ENTSO-E (2009) Agreed base case exchange values (BCEs). European network of transmission system operators for electricity (ENTSO-E). www.entsoe.eu. Accessed 20 Feb 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005c) The virtual fuel cell power plant, system development, build, field installation and European demonstration of a VIRTUAL FUEL CELL POWER PLANT consisting of residential Micro-CHP’s. Final Technical Report, European Fuel Cell Project, NNE5-2000-00208, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Försund F, Hjalmarsson L (2010) Renewable energy expansion and the value of balance regulation power, University of Gothenburg, School of Economics, Business and law, Working papers in economics 441

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox D (2010) Smart meter. DuD 34:408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V (2007) Einbindung von Speichern für erneuerbare Energien in die Kraftwerkseinsatzplanung – Einfluss auf die Strompreise der Spitzenlast. Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Selbstverlag des Lehrstuhls für Energiesysteme und Energiewirtschaft, Bochum

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (2009b) Can renewable energy save the world? VOX – research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists, 29 October 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2007) Energy security and climate policy – assessing interactions. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Klobasa M (2007) Dynamische Simulation eines Lastmanagements und Integration von Windenergie in ein Elektrizitätsnetz auf Landesebene unter regelungstechnischen und Kostengesichtspunkten. Dissertation, ETH Zürich, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig C, Kühling J, Theobald C (eds) (2004) Recht der Infrastrukturförderung. Sellier, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopfmüller J, Coenen R, Jörissen J, Langniß O, Nitsch J (2000) Konkretisierung und Operationalisierung des Leitbilds einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung für den Energiebereich. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Kalrsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Kösters S (2009) Subsidizing start-ups: policy targeting and policy effectiveness. Jena Economic Research Papers 083

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause O (2009) Bestimmung des Nutzungspotentials von Verteilnetzen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberger D, Bartels M, Borggrefe F, Bothe D, Wissen R, Hillebrand B, Buttermann HG, Bleul M (2008) Energiewirtschaftliches Gesamtkonzept 2030. Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universität Köln (EWI), Energy Environment Forecast Analysis GmbH (EEFA), herausgegeben vom Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft (BDEW), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud E (1972). Lectures on Microeconomic Theory. 1. Aufl. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, London. American Elsevier Publishing Co. Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder M, Willems B (2009) Borging van Publieke Belangen in de Energievoorziening. In: van Damme E, Schinkel MP (eds) Marktwerking en Publieke Belangen, Preadviezen van de Koninklijke Vereniging voor de Staatshuishoudskunde. KVS, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Praetorius B, Schumacher K (2009) Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world: the role of carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 37:5081–5093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RNE (2007) Ziele zur Nachhaltigen Entwicklung in Deutschland – Schwerpunktthemen, Dialogpapier des Nachhaltigkeitsrates, Nachhaltige Entwicklung in Deutschland – nächste Schritte. Der Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (RNE), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskill (2009) The economics of lithium. Roskill Information Services Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer DU (2009) Elektrische Energiespeicher – Technologien, Kosten, Alternativen. Diskussionspapier für das Projekt “Energiespeicher und virtuelle Kraftwerke” der Europäischen Akademie Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler GmbH, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfermeier A (2009) §9. In: Reshöft J (ed) Erneuerbare-Energien-GesetzHandkommentar, 3rd Aufl. Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair P (1992) High does nothing and rising is worse. Carbon taxes should keep declining to cut harmful emissions. Manch Sch LX:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (2008) Das grüne Paradox: Warum man das Angebot bei der Klimapolitik nicht vergessen darf. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9:109–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soete LLG, Ziesemer T (1997) Gains from trade and environmental policy under imperfect competition and pollution from transport. In: Feser HD, von Hauff M (eds) Neuere Entwicklungen in der Umweltökonomie und -politik. Volkswirtschaftliche Schriften Universität Kaiserslautern, Regensburg, pp 249–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan TN (1988) Introduction to part 1. In: Chenery H, Srinivasan TN (eds) Handbook of development economics, vol 1. Elsevier, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • SRU (2011) Wege zur 100% erneuerbaren Stromversorgung, Sondergutachten. Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (SRU), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger U, Achterberg W, Blok K, Bode H, Frenz W, Gather C, Hanekamp G, Imboden D, Jahnke M, Kost M, Kurz R, Nutzinger HG, Ziesemer T (2002) Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Innovation im Energiebereich, Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung, Band 18. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger U, Büdenbender U, Feess E, Nelles D (2008) Die Regulierung elektrischer Netze. Offene Fragen und Lösungsansätze, vol 32, Ethics of science and technology assessment. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodola N, Modi V (2009) Penetration of solar power without storage. Energy Policy 37:4730–4736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahil (2007) The trouble with lithium. Implications of Future PHEV Production for Lithium Demand. Meridian International Research, White Paper, 2nd edn. http://www.meridian-int-res.com/Projects/Lithium_Problem_2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeend W, van der Vaart J (1997) Greening taxes: the Dutch model. Paper for the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics (EAERE), Eighth annual conference, Tilburg, 26–28 June 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Welt Online (2009) RWE und GW verlangen eine Milliarde Steuergeld. www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article3426693/RWE-und-GE-verlangen-eine-Milliarde-Steuergeld.html. Accessed 07 March 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziesemer T (2000) Reconciling environmental policy with employment, international competitiveness and participation requirements. Konjunkturpolitik 46:241–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziesemer T (2008) Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz: Die falsche Alternative. Einige Beispiele zur Verdeutlichung des Zusammenhangs zwischen Marktunvollkommenheiten, Verteilung und Macht. In: Berger J, Nutzinger HG (eds) Ökonomie und Gesellschaft, Jahrbuch 21: Macht oder Ökonomisches Gesetz. Metropolis Verlag, Marburg, pp 353–378

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Droste-Franke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Droste-Franke, B. et al. (2012). Economic Analysis and Policy. In: Balancing Renewable Electricity. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, vol 40. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25157-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25157-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25156-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25157-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics