Advertisement

Demand for Balancing Electrical Energy and Power

  • Bert Droste-FrankeEmail author
  • Boris P. Paal
  • Christian Rehtanz
  • Dirk Uwe Sauer
  • Jens-Peter Schneider
  • Miranda Schreurs
  • Thomas Ziesemer
Chapter
Part of the Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 40)

Abstract

One important estimate to consider when trying to determine the most appropriate policy options is in which cases, and to what extent, a demand for balancing electrical energy and power exists which cannot be covered by the installed energy conversion systems themselves.

Keywords

Storage Capacity Storage System Wind Power Investment Cost Wind Power Generator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bundesregierung (2009) Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Regelung von Abscheidung, Transport und dauerhafter Speicherung von Kohlendioxid. Bundestags-Drucksache 16/12782Google Scholar
  2. Cavoukian A, Polonetsky J, Wolf C (2010) Smart privacy for the smart grid. Identity Inf Soc 3:275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hunt A, Markandya A (2001) Economic valuation, sustainability indicators and alternative assessment techniques. In: Friedrich R, Bickel P (eds) Environmental external costs of transport. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Küster R, Zürn M, Rath-Nagel S, Ellersdorfer I, Fahl U (2007) Energy system development in Germany, Europe and worldwide – a comprehensive study analysis, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung. Expertise im Auftrag der BASF AG, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  5. Maack M (2008) Generation, of the energy carrier HYDROGEN. In context with electricity buffering generation through fuel cells. Deliverable 8.5 RS1a, IP NEEDS, project no. 502687, Sixth Framework Programme, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. NEEDS (2010) The NEEDS life cycle inventory database, The European reference life cycle inventory database of future electricity supply systems. NEEDS project. http://www.isistest.com/needswebdb/search.php. Accessed 26 May 2010Google Scholar
  7. Neumayer E (1999) Weak versus strong sustainability, Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  8. Turner A (2008) Chair Committee on Climate Change, Letter to Secretary of State, Department for Energy and Climate Change, www.theccc.org.uk/pdfs/Interim%20report%20letter%20to%20DECC%20SofS.pdf. 30 Nov 2010Google Scholar
  9. Wolfhart D, Büsgen U, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (ed) (2007) Erfahrungsbericht 2007 zum Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG-Erfahrungsbericht), BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bert Droste-Franke
    • 1
    Email author
  • Boris P. Paal
    • 2
  • Christian Rehtanz
    • 3
  • Dirk Uwe Sauer
    • 4
  • Jens-Peter Schneider
    • 5
  • Miranda Schreurs
    • 6
  • Thomas Ziesemer
    • 7
  1. 1.Europäische Akademie GmbHBad Neuenahr-AhrweilerGermany
  2. 2.Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  3. 3.Lehrstuhl für Energiesysteme und EnergiewirtschaftTU DortmundNordrhein-WestfalenGermany
  4. 4.Institut für Stromrichtertechnik und Elektrische AntriebeRWTH AachenAachenGermany
  5. 5.Institut für Medien- und Informationsrecht/Öffentliches RechtUniversität FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  6. 6.Forschungsstelle für UmweltpolitikFreie Universiät BerlinBerlinGermany
  7. 7.Department of EconomicsMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations