Advertisement

DESIRE WEB 2.0 - Integration Management and Distributed Software Development for Complex Service Robots

  • Ulrich Reiser
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 76)

Abstract

Current activities to improve the robot development process mostly focus on the technical aspects of robot development, including the fostering of robotic development frameworks, the integration of model driven engineering methods and tools, or the assessment of best practice components and architectures. In contrast this article highlights aspects that are orthogonal to this technical point of view: the cooperation and project management aspects of robot development processes. Distributed development and testing on a common hardware platform require remote and anytime accessibility paired with a respective resource management, high operability of the robot including quality management and easy deployment of new software components. In the present article a web-based integration platform for distributed development and test is presented that aims at providing an integrated solution for these requirements. It was developed in the last phase of the DESIRE project due to the urgent need for a powerful tool that would reduce the immense integration efforts within the project. The results of the practical evaluation of the web portal are given in the last section of this article.

Keywords

Hardware Platform Service Robot Virtual Team Software Repository Collaboration Tool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deutsche Service-Robotik Initiative (DESIRE), http://www.service-robotik-initiative.de
  2. 2.
    IBM aims to ”Jazz” up development with tool, community (2007), http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/061107-ibm-aims-to-jazz-up.html
  3. 3.
    Belousov, I.R., Chebukov, S., Sazonov, V.V.: Web-based Teleoperation of the Robot Interacting with Fast Moving Objects. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation (ICRA), pp. 673–678 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belousov, I.R., Tan, J., Clapworthy, G.J.: Teleoperation and Java3D Visualization of a Robot Manipulator over the World Wide Web. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Information Visualisation (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deng, G., Balasubramanian, J., Otte, W., Schmidt, D.C., Gokhale, A.: DAnCE: A QoS-enabled Component Deployment and Configuration Engine. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Working Conference of Component Deployment (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edgewall Software: The trac integrated scm and project management (2010), http://trac.edgewall.org
  7. 7.
    Grohmann, S.: Projektmanagement in verteilten Projektteams. Expert Survey conducted by the University of Leipzig (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hertel, G., Orlikowski, B.: Projektmanagement in ortsverteilten ”virtuellen” Teams. In: Wastian, Braumandl, Rosenstiel (eds.) Angewandte Psychologie für Projektmanager, pp. 327–346. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Intland Software: Javaforge scalable project hosting (2010), http://www.javaforge.com/
  10. 10.
    Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process, an introduction, 3rd edn. Addison-Weasly (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Object Management Group (OMG): Deployment and configuration adopted submission,omg document ptc/03-07-08 edn. (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Otte, W., Schmidt, D., Gokhale, A.: Towards an adaptive deployment and configuration framework for component-based distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Adaptive and Reflective Middleware, ARM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quigley, M., Gerkey, B., Conley, K., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Berger, E., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.: ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf.  on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reiser, U., Klauser, R., Parlitz, C., Verl, A.: DESIRE WEB 2.0 - integration management and distributed software development for service robots. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, ICAR (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schlegel, C., Haßler, T., Lotz, A., Steck, A.: Robotic software systems: From code-driven to model-driven designs. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf.  on Advanced Robotics, ICAR (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The GForge Group: Gforge advanced server (2010), http://gforge.org
  17. 17.
    The Gna! people: Savane - Zusammenfassung, https://gna.org/projects/savane
  18. 18.
    Tyler, J.: Ros web-interface (2010), http://www.ros.org/wiki/webui

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer IPAStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations