Advertisement

Editorial

  • Wolfram Burgard
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 76)

Abstract

The development of flexible mobile manipulation robots is widely envisioned as a large breakthrough in technology and is expected to have a significant impact on our economy and society in the future. Mobile manipulation robots that are equipped with one or more gripper arms could fulfill various useful services in private homes such as cleaning, tidying up, or cooking, which would result in a significant time benefit to their owners. By supporting elderly and mobility-impaired people in the activities of daily life, such robots can reduce the dependency on external caregivers and can support them to live a self-determined and autonomous life. Small and medium-sized enterprises would profit enormously from robotic co-workers that they can easily reconfigure to new production tasks. This technology would significantly reduce the production costs of smaller companies and thus provide them with a significant competitive advantage. The challenge in these applications is that robots operating in unstructured environments have to cope with less prior knowledge about themselves and their surroundings. Therefore, they need to be able to autonomously learn suitable models from their own sensor data to robustly fulfill their tasks.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Body Schema Kinematic Structure Legged Robot Unstructured Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bongard, J., Zykov, V., Lipson, H.: Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science 314(5802), 1118–1121 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dearden, A., Demiris, Y.: Learning forward models for robots. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Edinburgh, Scotland (2005)Google Scholar
  3. Gatla, C.S., Lumia, R., Wood, J., Starr, G.: An automated method to calibrate industrial robots using a virtual closed kinematic chain. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO) 23(6), 1105–1116 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. He, R., Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Yang, S.: Kinematic-parameter identification for serial-robot calibration based on POE formula. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO) 26(3), 411–423 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoffmann, M., Marques, H., Hernandez Arieta, A., Sumioka, H., Lungarella, M., Pfeifer, R.: Body schema in robotics: a review. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 2(4), 304–324 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuipers, B., Browning, R., Gribble, B., Hewett, M., Remolina, E.: The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence 119, 191–233 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kumar, S., Behera, L., McGinnity, T.M.: Kinematic control of a redundant manipulator using an inverse-forward adaptive scheme with a KSOM based hint generator. Robotics and Autonomous Systems (RAS) 58(5), 622–633 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pradeep, V., Konolige, K., Berger, E.: Calibrating a multi-arm multi-sensor robot: A bundle adjustment approach. In: Intl. Symp. on Experimental Robotics (ISER), New Delhi, India (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für InformatikAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations