Advertisement

Towards Robust Service Workflows: A Decentralized Approach

(Short Paper)
  • Mario Henrique Cruz Torres
  • Tom Holvoet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7044)

Abstract

Nowadays service workflows are used to increase the efficiency of process oriented supply chains. Service workflows can encompass hundreds of services around a single process. These services are geographically spread and cross organizational boundaries. This raises the need for coordination, such as assigning tasks, synchronizing production schedules, between companies collaborating through services. We present a fully decentralized coordination mechanism that, using the local knowledge available at each company participating in the supply chain, allows the enactment of robust processes. We evaluate our solution through simulations and show that it can create robust service compositions.

Keywords

Supply Chain Overlay Network Coordination Mechanism Component Service Composite Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sandberg, E., Abrahamsson, M.: The role of top management in supply chain management practices. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 38(1), 57–69 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glenn Richey, R., Tokman, M., Dalela, V.: Examining collaborative supply chain service technologies: a study of intensity, relationships, and resources. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38(1), 71–89 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ludwig, H., Nakata, T., Wäldrich, O., Wieder, P., Ziegler, W.: Reliable Orchestration of Resources Using WS-Agreement. In: Gerndt, M., Kranzlmüller, D. (eds.) HPCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4208, pp. 753–762. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holvoet, T., Weyns, D., Valckenaers, P.: Patterns of delegate mas. In: International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 1–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorigo, M., Caro, G.D., Gambardella, L.M.: Ant algorithms for discrete optimization. Artificial Life 5, 137–172 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghezzi, C., Motta, A., Panzica La Manna, V., Tamburrelli, G.: QoS Driven Dynamic Binding in-the-Many. In: Heineman, G.T., Kofron, J., Plasil, F. (eds.) QoSA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6093, pp. 68–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13821-8_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stein, S., Payne, T., Jennings, N.: Robust execution of service workflows using redundancy and advance reservations. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 4(2), 125–139 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Henrique Cruz Torres
    • 1
  • Tom Holvoet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations