• Ali Saeedi
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


In this research the effect of a number of factors which are considered as greatly influencing the CO2-brine flow characteristics during carbon dioxide geo-sequestration have been evaluated. The main focus of the research has been on the factors which change the multiphase flow behaviour of the involved fluids in the underground porous media over time in short and long terms. The first part of this chapter focuses on the importance of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a means of reducing the level of the atmospheric CO2. The second part presents an outline of the research objectives and the chapter ends with a brief overview of the contents of this dissertation.


Multiphase Flow Deep Saline Aquifer Fluid Flow Characteristic Hydrocarbon Recovery Deplete Hydrocarbon Reservoir 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: syntheses report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    García JE (2003) Fluid dynamics of carbon dioxide disposal into saline aquifers. PhD theses, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNFCCC (2002) Climate change information kit. Technical report, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scripps Institution of Oceanography (2010) Mauna Loa observatory, Hawaii. La Jolla, CA. Accessed 23/5/2010
  5. 5.
    Orr FM Jr (2004) Storage of carbon dioxide in geologic formations. J Pet Tech 56:90–97Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Office of Science (1999) Carbon sequestration research and development. The U.S. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rudins G, Bajura (1999) Carbon sequestration R and D program plan. The U.S. Department of Energy. Accessed 1 June 2010
  8. 8.
    Bachu S (2000) Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Conserv Manag 41:953–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bachu S, Haug K (2005) In situ characteristics of acid-gas injection operations in the Alberta basin, western Canada: demonstration of CO2 geological storage. In: Benson SM (ed) Geological storage of carbon dioxide with monitoring and verification, vol 2. Elsevier, London, pp 867–876Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennion B, Bachu S (2005) Relative permeability characteristics for supercritical CO2 displacing water in a veriety of potential sequestration zones in the Western Canada sedimentary basin. SPE 95547, The SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braiser FM, Kobelski BJ (1996) Deep injection disposal of hazardous and industrial waste: scientific and engineering aspects. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moritis G (2002) Special report: enhanced oil recovery-2002 worldwide EOR survey. Oil Gas J 100:43–47Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seo JG (2004) Experimental and simulation studies of sequestration of supercritical carbon dioxide in depleted gas reservoirs. PhD theses, Texas A and M University, Texas, p 132Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pruess K, Tianfu X, Apps J, Garcia J (2003) Numerical modeling of aquifer disposal of CO2: SPE 83695. SPE J 8:49–60Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seo JG, Mamora DD (2003) Experimental and simulation studies of sequestration of supercritical carbon dioxide in depleted gas reservoirs. SPE 81200, SPE 81200, SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and production environmental conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Antonio, TexasGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Span R, Wagner W (1996) A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from triple-point temperature to 1,100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. J Phys Chem Ref Data 25:1509–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sweatman RE, Parker ME, Crookshank SL (2009) Industry experience with CO2-enhanced oil recovery technology, SPE 126446, SPE international conference on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization, Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Diego, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright I, Ringrose P, Mathieson A, Eiken O (2009) An overview of active large-scale CO2 storage projects. SPE 127096, SPE international conference on CO2 capture, storage and utilization, Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ennis-King J, Paterson L (2007) Coupling of geochemical reactions and convective mixing in the long-term geological storage of carbon dioxide. Int J Greenh Gas Control 1:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Izgec O, Demiral B, Bertin H, Akin S (2008) CO2 injection into saline carbonate aquifer formations: laboratory investigation. Transp Porous Media 72:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nogueira M (2005) Effect of flue gas impurities on the process of injection and storage of carbon dioxide in depleted gas reservoirs. MSc theses, Texas A and M University, TexasGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ross GD, Todd AC, Tweedie JA, Will AG (1982) The dissolution effects of CO2-brine systems on the permeability of U.K. and North Sea calcareous sandstones. SPE 10685, SPE/DOE third joint symposium on enhanced oil recovery of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, OKGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wellman TP, Grigg RB, McPherson BJ, Svec RK, Lichtner PC (2003) Evaluation of CO2-brine-reservoir rock interaction with laboratory flow tests and reactive transport modeling. In: International symposium on oilfield chemistry. Society of Petroleum Engineers, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Juanes R, Spiteri EJ, Orr FM Jr, Blunt MJ (2006) Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage. Water Resour Res 42:W12418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spiteri EJ, Juanes R (2006) Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on the numerical simulation of WAG injection. J Pet Sci Eng 50:115–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Petroleum EngineeringCurtin UniversityKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations