Complexity Analysis Using Nonuniform Embedding Techniques for Voice Pathological Discrimination

  • J. A. Gomez Garcia
  • J. I. Godino Llorente
  • G. Castellanos-Domínguez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7015)

Abstract

Automatic voice pathology detection systems are receiving an increasingly growing interest due to the their advantages compared to traditional systems (non invasiveness, objectivity and reduction in time and cost analysis). In this respect, the complexity analysis has been also introduced within the automatic detection framework for providing more reliability and higher system performance. However, such an analysis needs for an initial reconstruction stage that is devoted to map the studied voice recordings onto phase space. Mapping is usually carried out using a uniform embedding. Nonetheless, the uniform embedding might be no the optimal for biosignal processing having different timescales, i.e. a short lag is optimal for high frequency components whereas a long lag is related to low frequency components and modulations, so, to get a unique optimal value lag leads to inadequate processing for both timescales. To cope with this drawback, this work discusses a non-uniform embedding approach that is validated by using two complexity features. The attained results using k-nn and Support Vector Machines show superior performance in comparison to those reached by uniform embedding, and thus providing evidence of the validity of the discussed training technique.

Keywords

Support Vector Machine Vocal Fold Short Time Analysis Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Approximate Entropy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Godino-Llorente, J., Sáenz-Lechón, N., Osma-Ruiz, V., Aguilera-Navarro, S., Gómez-Vilda, P.: An integrated tool for the diagnosis of voice disorders. Medical Engineering & Physics 28(3), 276–289 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gómez-Vilda, P., et al.: Glottal source biometrical signature for voice pathology detection. Speech Communication 51(9), 759–781 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang, J.-J., Zhang, Y., McGilligan, C.: Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement. Journal of Voice 20(1), 2–17 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Titze, I.R.: The Myoelastic Aerodynamic Theory of Phonation. The National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steinecke, I., Herzel, H.: Bifurcations in an asymmetric vocal-fold model. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 1874 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Nonlinear Optimization. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 898, pp. 366–381. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Judd, K., Mees, A.: Embedding as a modelling problem. Physica D 20(3-4), 273–286 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peng, H., Long, F., Ding, C.: Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1226–1238 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kantz, H., Schreiber, T.: Nonlinear time series analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tolle, C., McJunkin, T., Rohrbaugh, D., LaViolette, R.: Lacunarity definition for ramified data sets based on optimal cover. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 179(3-4), 129–152 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pincus, S.M.: Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2297–2301 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richman, J.-S., Moorman, J.-R.: Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 278, H2039–H2049 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary: Voice disorders database, version.1.03 (cd-rom). Kay Elemetrics Corp., Lincoln Park (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parsa, V., Jamieson, D.: Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43(2), 469 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arias-Londoño, J., Godino-Llorente, J., Castellanos-Domínguez, G.: Short time analysis of pathological voices using complexity measures. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Advanced Voice Function Assessment (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Gomez Garcia
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. I. Godino Llorente
    • 2
  • G. Castellanos-Domínguez
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Nacional de ColombiaColombia
  2. 2.Universidad Politécnica de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations