Advertisement

Quantum-Like Uncertain Conditionals for Text Analysis

  • Alvaro Francisco Huertas-Rosero
  • C. J. van Rijsbergen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7052)

Abstract

Simple representations of documents based on the occurrences of terms are ubiquitous in areas like Information Retrieval, and also frequent in Natural Language Processing. In this work we propose a logical-probabilistic approach to the analysis of natural language text based in the concept of Uncertain Conditional, on top of a formulation of lexical measurements inspired in the theoretical concept of ideal quantum measurements. The proposed concept can be used for generating topic-specific representations of text, aiming to match in a simple way the perception of a user with a pre-established idea of what the usage of terms in the text should be. A simple example is developed with two versions of a text in two languages, showing how regularities in the use of terms are detected and easily represented.

Keywords

Information Retrieval Order Relation Quantum Logic Belief Revision Orthomodular Lattice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beltrametti, E.G., Cassinelli, G.: The logic of Quantum Mechanics. Addison Wesley, Reading (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burris, S., Sankappanavar, H.P.: A Course on Universal Algebra. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Cervantes-Saavedra, M.: Don Quijote. Project Gutemberg (1615)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Cervantes-Saavedra, M.: The ingenious gentleman Don Quixote of La Mancha. Project Gutemberg, translation by John Ormsby (1885) edition, 1615 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Hooghe, B., Pyackz, J.: On some new operations on orthomodular lattices. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39(3), 641–652 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman, C., Kra, P., Rzhetsky, A.: Two biomedical sublanguages: a description based on the theories of Zellig Harris. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 35(4), 222–235 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gärdenfors, P.: Belief revisions and the Ramsey test for conditionals. The Philosophical Review 95(1), 81–93 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardner, M.: Is Quantum Logic Really Logic? Philosophy of Science 38(4), 508–529 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gleason, A.M.: Measures of the closed subspaces of the hilbert space. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6, 885–893 (1957)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris, Z.: Discourse and Sublanguage, ch. 11, pp. 231–236. de Gruyter, Berlin (1982)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huertas-Rosero, A., Azzopardi, L., van Rijsbergen, C.: Characterising through erasing: A theoretical framework for representing documents inspired by quantum theory. In: vam Rijsbergen, C.J., Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W. (eds.) Proc. 2nd AAAI Quantum Interaction Symposium, pp. 160–163. College Publications, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huibers, T., Bruza, P.: Situations, a general framework for studying information retrieval. Information Retrieval: New Systems and Current Research 2 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lalmas, M.: Logical models in information retrieval: Introduction and overview. Information Processing and Management 34(1), 19–33 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lund, K., Burgess, C.: Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical cooccurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 28(2), 203–208 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mares, E.D.: Relevant Logic: A Physlosophical Interpretations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004); Preface: The author claims that this kind of logic is suitable for dealing with semantics Introductions: Non Sequitur is badGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pavicic, M., Megill, N.: Is Quantum Logic a Logic?, ch. 2, pp. 23–47. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Rijsbergen, C.J.: A new theoretical framework for information retrieval. In: SIGIR 1986: Proceedings of the 9th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 194–200. ACM, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Rijsbergen, C.J.: The Geometry of Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    von Neumann, J., Birkhoff, G.: The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 43, 298–331 (1936)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Widdows, D., Kanerva, P.: Geometry and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alvaro Francisco Huertas-Rosero
    • 1
  • C. J. van Rijsbergen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GlasgowUK
  2. 2.University of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations