Abstract

This paper introduces a governmental project to develop a recommendation system, which recommends products to customers, recognizing their ‘kansei’ desires. The project aims at supporting sales expansion and new products development in traditional crafts in Ishikawa prefecture, Japan. For this, the project is developing a technique for selecting and providing information according to individual person’s ‘kansei’ desire, in order to develop a ‘kansei’ search engine with an information aggregation system and a product data base system. In the future, this technique will be used in developing a technique to measure and evaluate peoples’ feeling or ‘kansei’, or a technique to select and provide ‘kansei’ information according to individual person’s preference, ability, or characteristics.

Keywords

Recommendation System Fuzzy Model Information Aggregation Computer Support Cooperative Work Order Weight Average 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nagamachi, M.: Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 15, 3–11 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagamachi, M.: Kansei as powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 33, 289–294 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Childs, T., de Pennington, J., Rait, J., Robins, T., Jones, K., Workman, C., Warren, S., Colwill, J.: Affective design (Kansei engineering) in Japan. Faraday Packaging Partnership, Univ. Leeds, Leeds (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P. H.: The Measurement of Meaning. Univ of Illinois Press, Urbana (1957)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yan, H.B., Huynh, V.N., Murai, T., Nakamori, Y.: Kansei evaluation based on prioritized multi-attribute fuzzy target-oriented decision analysis. Information Sciences 178(21), 4080–4093 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huynh, V.N., Yan, H.B., Nakamori, Y.: A target-based decision-making approach to consumer-oriented evaluation model for Japanese traditional crafts. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 57(4), 575–588 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bordley, R., LiCalzi, M.: Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions in Economics and Finance 23(1), 53–74 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rich, E.: User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science 3(4), 329–354 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powell, M.L.D.: Approximation Theory and Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Armstrong, J.S. (ed.): Principles of Forecasting - A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Springer, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1994), Chapel Hill, NC, USA, October 22-26, pp. 175–186 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating ‘word of mouth’. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 1995 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, Denver, CO, USA, May 7-11, pp. 210–217 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill, W., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M., Furnas, G.: Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 1995 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, Denver, CO, May 7-11, pp. 194–201 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huynh, V.H., Nakamori, Y., Ryoke, M., Ho, T.B.: Decision making under uncertainty with fuzzy targets. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 6(3), 255–278 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huynh, V.N., Nakamori, Y., Lawry, J.: A probability-based approach to comparison of fuzzy numbers and applications to target oriented decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 16(2), 371–387 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18(1), 183–190 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences 4, 199–249 (1978)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Parallel Programming 11(5), 341–356 (1982)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wierzbicki, A.P.: Multiple criteria decision making: Theory and applications. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds.). LNEMS, vol. 177, pp. 468–486. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiteru Nakamori
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Knowledge ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNomiJapan

Personalised recommendations