Advertisement

Ceramic Bone Substitutes

  • Klaus Draenert
  • Yvette Draenert
  • Tim Pohlemann
  • Gerd Regel
Chapter

Abstract

Bioglasses represent noncrystalline compositions which are normally mélanges of alkaline and acid oxides. Alkaline oxides are Na, K, Mg, Ca, or Ba oxides, whereas silicium dioxide represents a well-known molecule for reticulations. Bioglasses are used in coating implants (Hench et al. 1971). Since the manufacturing processes of physiological calcium phosphates have been improved enormously, bioglasses play no role in bone substitution at the moment.

Keywords

Tricalcium Phosphate Transverse Abdominal Muscle Granulate Material Alkaline Oxide Bony Ingrowth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bauer TW, Smith ST (2002) Bioactive materials in orthopaedic surgery: overview and regulatory considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R et al (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edontulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 16:1–132Google Scholar
  3. Draenert AI (2011) Zur Einheilung und Resorption von Hydroxylapatit und ß-Tricalciumphosphat. Eine tierexperimentelle Studie am Tibiakopf des Hundes. Dissertation. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  4. Draenert K, Wiese FG, Garde U et al (2001) Synthetische Knochenersatzwerkstoffe auf HA- und TCP-Basis. Trauma Berufskrankh 4:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Draenert K, Draenert M, Erler M et al (2011) How bone forms in large cancellous defects: critical analysis based on experimental work and literature. Injury, Int J Care Injured 42:47–55Google Scholar
  6. Eggli PS, Müller W, Schenk RK (1988) Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:127–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen T et al (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 5:117–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmes RE, Wardrop RW, Wolford LM (1988) Hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in ortho­gnathic surgery: histologic and histometric findings. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(8):661–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kühne JH, Barti R, Frisch B et al (1994) Bone formation in coralline hydroxyapatite. Effects of pore sized studies in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 65:246–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meiss L (1986) Untersuchung der Knochenregeneration in standardisierten Knochendefekten des Göttinger Miniatur­schweins nach Auffüllung mit zerkleinerten Corticalis und porösen CA-Phosphat Keramiken. Habilitationsschrift der Medizinischen Fakultät, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  11. Osborn JF (1985) Die physiologische Integration von Hydroxylapatitkeramiken in das Knochengewebe. Hefte Unfallheilk 174:101–105Google Scholar
  12. Renooij W, Hoogendoorn HA, Visser WJ et al (1985) Bioresorption of ceramic strontium-85-labeled calcium phosphate implants in dog femora. A pilot study to quantitate bioresorption of ceramic implants of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium orthophosphate in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res 197:272–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weidenreich F (1923) Knochenstudien. 1.Teil: Über Aufbau und Entwicklung des Knochens und den Charakter des Knochengewebes. Z Anat 69:382–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. White E, Shors EC (1986) Biomaterial aspects of Interpore-200 porous hydroxyapatite. Dent Clin North Am 30:49–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. White RA, Weber JN, White NW (1972) Replaminiform: a new process for preparing porous ceramic metal and polymer prosthetic materials. Science 176:922–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wiese FG (1998) Histomorphologie einer synthetisch her­gestellten Hydroxylapatit (Ca5(PO4)3OH) Positivkeramik. Knochenersatzwerkstoff mit reproduzierbarer definierter Porengrösse im interkonnektierenden Porensystem. Dissertation Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität, MünchenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Draenert
    • 1
  • Yvette Draenert
    • 1
  • Tim Pohlemann
    • 2
  • Gerd Regel
    • 3
  1. 1.Zentrum fÜr Orthopädische WissenschaftenMÜnchenGermany
  2. 2.Klinik fÜr Unfall-, Hand- und WiederherstellungschirurgieUniversitätsklinikum des SaarlandesHomburgGermany
  3. 3.Klinikum Rosenheim UnfallchirurgieRosenheimGermany

Personalised recommendations