Event Condition Expectation (ECE-) Rules for Monitoring Observable Systems
The standardization and broad adoption of Service Oriented Architectures, Web Services, and Cloud Computing is raising the complexity of ICT systems. Hence, assuring correct system behavior with regard to established design and business constraints is of the utmost importance. Run-time monitoring, where the outcomes of an observed system are continuously checked against what is expected of it, is one possible approach to providing the required oversight.
In this paper, we discuss this notion of rule expectations, their violation and/or fulfillment, and use these concepts to define the concept of an Event-Condition-Expectation (ECE-) rule, a variation of the traditional Event-Condition-Action rule pattern. To demonstrate these concepts, we present extensions to the syntax used by the production rule engine, Drools, and describe their use in a medical case study. The clinical decision support system being developed monitors rule evaluations and expectations, detects constraint violations and is able to take recovery/ compensation actions as appropriate.
KeywordsCloud Computing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Parent Expectation Abstract Syntax Tree Complex Event Processing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Desai, N., Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Representing and reasoning about commitments in business processes. In: AAAI, pp. 1328–1333. AAAI Press (2007)Google Scholar
- 11.Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic. In: ICAIL, pp. 25–34. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
- 12.JBoss: JBoss Drools 5.2 - Business Logic Integration Platform (2011), www.jboss.org/drools
- 13.Luckham, D.: The Power of Events: An Introduction to Complex Event Processing in Distributed Enterprise Systems. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
- 14.Montali, M., Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Storari, S.: Declarative specification and verification of service choreographiess. TWEB 4(1) (2010)Google Scholar
- 18.Sottara, D., Mello, P., Sartori, C., Fry, E.: Enhancing a production rule engine with predictive models using pmml. In: KDD 2011 (to appear, 2011)Google Scholar
- 20.Torroni, P., Chesani, F., Yolum, P., Gavanelli, M., Singh, M.P., Lamma, E., Alberti, M., Mello, P.: Modelling Interactions via Commitments and Expectations. IGI Global (2009)Google Scholar
- 21.Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments. In: AAMAS, pp. 527–534. ACM (2002)Google Scholar