VAMEE: A Value Aware Method for Evaluating Inclusive E-Government Initiatives

  • Gustaf Juell-Skielse
  • Erik Perjons
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 92)


The growing use of ICT solutions for improving the public sector has created a need for valuating e-government initiatives. A number of methods for this purpose have been developed, but they are typically restricted to analyzing the benefits and costs of only one single actor. There is, therefore, a need for methods that take a broader view and take into account entire networks of actors. This paper proposes a novel method, called VAMEE, the purpose of which is to produce a well-grounded and easily understandable valuation of an e-government initiative that takes into consideration the benefits, costs, and interrelationships of all actors concerned. The basis of the proposed method is a combination of enterprise modeling techniques, in particular goal modeling and value modeling, with an established method for cost benefit analysis (i.e. Peng). VAMEE is designed to be inclusive, easily understandable, and visual. These properties of the method will support accurate and unbiased valuations as well as improved innovation in the development of e-government initiatives.


e-government benefit analysis enterprise modeling goal modeling value modeling requirements engineering 


  1. 1.
    Grönlund, Å.: Ten Years of E-Government: The ‘End of History’ and New Beginning. In: Wimmer, M.A., Chappelet, J.-L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6228, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, M.P., Jana, D.: E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly 20, 365–387 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission, A Digital Agenda for Europe, (viewed May 20, 2011)
  4. 4.
    Savas, E.S.: Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. CQ Press, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, Local self-government, (viewed December 7, 2009)
  6. 6.
    Juell-Skielse, G., Perjons, E.: New Challenges for e-Government: Value Realization among Independent Actors. In: 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 437–445. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    CIO Council. The value measuring methodology: Highlights. Washington, DC7 CIO Council, Best Practices Committee (2001) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E-Government Delegation. Vägledning i nyttorealisering, (viewed June 30, 2011)
  9. 9.
    Juell-Skielse, G., Perjons, E.: Improving E-Government through Benefit Analysis and Value Modeling. In: Ahamed, S.I., Bertino, E., Chang, C.K., Getov, V., Liu, L., Ming, H., Subramanyan, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2009, Seattle, Washington, USA, July 20-24, pp. 332–339. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dahlgren, L.E., Lundgren, G., Stigberg, L.: Make IT profitable: PENG - A practical tool for financial evaluation of IT benefits, Ekerlids Förlag (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce idea. Req. Engineering Journal 8(2), 114–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dahlgren, L.E., Lundgren, G., Stigberg, L.: Öka nyttan av IT i vården!: att skapa och värdera nytta i verksamheten med hjälp av PENG-modellen, Ekerlids (2003) (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riesbeck, C.K., Schank, R.: Inside Case-based Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fredriksson, O.: Beyond Assessing Economic Net Value from Electronic Commerce-Supported Business Process Redesign − a Discussion of the PENG Method. In: Bubenko jr, J., Fischer-Hübner, S., Lindskog, S., Nilsson, A.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Promote IT 2004 Conference, May 5-7, pp. 382–393. Karlstad University (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCarthy, W.E.: The REA Accounting Model: A Generalized Fra,ework for Accounting Systems in Shared Data Environment, The Accounting Review (1982)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology, PhD thesis, HEC Lausanne (2004), (accessed January 5, 2008)
  17. 17.
    Yu, E.: Modeling Strategic relationships for process engineering. Dep. Of Computer Science, University of Toronto (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    OMG Business Motivation Model, Version 1.1, Object Management Group (2010b),,maj2010 (April 19, 2011)
  19. 19.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Weigand, H.: Resourse Analysis and Classification of Purpose Driven Value Model Design. Int. Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 1(1), 56–78Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kohli, R., Hoadley, E.: Towards Developing a Framework for Measuring Organizational Impact of IT-Enabled BPR: Case Studies of Three Firms. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 37(1) (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Becker, J., Bergener, P., Räckers, M.: Process-Based Governance in Public Administration Using Activity-Based Costing. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) EGOV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5693, pp. 176–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grimsley, M., Meehan, A.: e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 134–148 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chircu, A.M.: E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework. Electronic Government 5(4), 345–363 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Irani, Z., Love, P., Elliman, T., Jones, S., Themistocleous, M.: Evaluating e-Government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal 15, 61–82 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustaf Juell-Skielse
    • 1
  • Erik Perjons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations