Repeated Budgeted Second Price Ad Auction

  • Asaph Arnon
  • Yishay Mansour
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6982)


Our main goal is to abstract existing repeated sponsored search ad auction mechanisms which includes budgets, and study their equilibrium and dynamics. Our abstraction has multiple agents biding repeatedly for multiple identical items (such as impressions in an ad auction). The agents are budget limited and have a value for per item. We abstract the repeated interaction as a one-shot game, which we call budget auction, where agents submit a bid and a budget, and then items are sold by a sequential second price auction. Once an agent exhausts its budget it does not participate in the proceeding auctions.

Our main result is that if agents bid conservatively (never bid above their value) then there always exists a pure Nash equilibrium. We also study simple dynamics of repeated budget auctions, showing their convergence to a Nash equilibrium for two agents and for multiple agents with identical budgets.


Dominant Strategy Bidding Strategy Combinatorial Auction Price Auction Minimum Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andelman, N., Mansour, Y.: Auctions with budget constraints. In: Hagerup, T., Katajainen, J. (eds.) SWAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3111, pp. 26–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asdemir, K.: Bidding patterns in search engine auctions. In: In Second Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, ACM Electronic Commerce, Press (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azar, Y., Birnbaum, B.E., Karlin, A.R., Mathieu, C., Nguyen, C.T.: Improved approximation algorithms for budgeted allocations. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 186–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azar, Y., Birnbaum, B.E., Karlin, A.R., Nguyen, C.T.: On revenue maximization in second-price ad auctions. In: Fiat, A., Sanders, P. (eds.) ESA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5757, pp. 155–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babaioff, M., Sharma, Y., Slivkins, A.: Characterizing truthful multi-armed bandit mechanisms: extended abstract. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 79–88 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhawalkar, K., Roughgarden, T.: Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In: SODA (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Immorlica, N., Mahdian, M., Saberi, A.: Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders. In: EC 2005: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 44–51 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgs, C., Immorlica, N., Chayes, J., Jain, K.: Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions. In: Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 13–723 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cary, M., Das, A., Edelman, B., Giotis, I., Heimerl, K., Karlin, A.R., Mathieu, C., Schwarz, M.: Greedy bidding strategies for keyword auctions. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 262–271 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Devanur, N.R., Kakade, S.M.: The price of truthfulness for pay-per-click auctions. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 99–106 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Lavi, R.: Multi-unit auctions with budget limits. In: Proc. of the 49th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M.: Strategic bidder behavior in sponsored search auctions. In: Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, ACM Electronic Commerce, pp. 192–198 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fiat, A., Leonardi, S., Saia, J., Sankowski, P.: Single valued combinatorial auctions with budgets. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce 2011, pp. 223–232 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kitts, B., LeBlanc, B.J.: Optimal bidding on keyword auctions. Electronic Markets 14(3), 186–201 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leme, R.P., Tardos, É.: Pure and bayes-nash price of anarchy for generalized second price auction. In: FOCS, pp. 735–744 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Markakis, E., Telelis, O.: Discrete strategies in keyword auctions and their inefficiency for locally aware bidders. In: Saberi, A. (ed.) WINE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6484, pp. 523–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U., Vazirani, V.: Adwords and generalized online matching. J. ACM 54(5), 22 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muthukrishnan, S.: Ad exchanges: Research issues. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nisan, N.: Google’s auction for TV ads. In: Fiat, A., Sanders, P. (eds.) ESA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5757, pp. 553–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.: Algorithmic Game Theory, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orda, A., Rom, R., Shimkin, N.: Competitive routing in multiuser communication networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1(5), 510–521 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varian, H.R.: Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asaph Arnon
    • 1
  • Yishay Mansour
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer scienceTel Aviv UniversityIsrael
  2. 2.GoogleTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations